SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maliye ve Finans Yazıları / 2016 / Sayı: 105

Bankruptcy Postponement and Panoramic Analysis on Bankruptcy Postponement Litigations in Turkey Between 2009-2013

İflasın Ertelenmesi ve Türkiye’de 2009-2013 Arasındaki İflasın Ertelenmesi Davalarının Analizi

Güven SAYILGAN
Arslan ECE
Pages
47–74
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Litigations were concludedin 285 days on average where postponement was accepted for30% while refused for 48%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bankruptcy postponement is regulated by Articles 376-377 of Turkish Commercial Code and 179 of Execution andBankruptcy Code.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a legal remedying process developed torecover “insolvent” capital stock companies from bankruptcy bycorrecting their financial situation under trustee management,should court finds the proposed “improvement plan” convincing.This study aims to profile the postponement litigations filed in Turkeybetween 2009-2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Litigations were concludedin 285 days on average where postponement was accepted for30% while refused for 48%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İflas · İflasın Ertelenmesi · Bankruptcy

Abstract

Bankruptcy postponement is regulated by Articles 376-377 of Turkish Commercial Code and 179 of Execution andBankruptcy Code. It is a legal remedying process developed torecover “insolvent” capital stock companies from bankruptcy bycorrecting their financial situation under trustee management,should court finds the proposed “improvement plan” convincing.This study aims to profile the postponement litigations filed in Turkeybetween 2009-2013. During that period, 2.712 litigations werefiled, 1.921 of them were concluded. Litigations were concludedin 285 days on average where postponement was accepted for30% while refused for 48%.

Özet

İflasın ertelenmesi, Türk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 376-377. maddeleriile İcra ve İflas Kanunu’nun 179. maddesinde düzenlenmiştir.Erteleme; “borca batık” sermaye şirketinin sunacağı “iyileştirmeprojesi”nin mahkemece inandırıcı bulunması durumunda, kayyımyönetiminde, şirketin finansal durumunun düzeltilerek iflastankurtarılması için geliştirilmiş bir yasal çözüm sürecidir. Bu çalışma,2009-2013 döneminde Türkiye’de açılan iflasın ertelenmesi davalarınınprofilinin belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu dönemde2.712 dava açılmış ve bunların 1.921’i sonuçlanmıştır. Davalarortalama 285 günde sonuçlanmış, % 30’unda erteleme kabul edilmiş,% 48’inde reddedilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYILGAN, G., ECE, A. (2016). Bankruptcy Postponement and Panoramic Analysis on Bankruptcy Postponement Litigations in Turkey Between 2009-2013. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, Sayı: 105, 47–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/228879

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. 2004 Sayılı İcra ve İflas Kanunu 6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu A Brief History of Bankruptcy. http://www.bankruptcydata.com/ch11history. htm. (Erişim Tarihi 14.03.2015). Adalet Bakanlığı Ulusal Yargı Ağı Bilişim Sistemi (UYAP) verileri. Arslan, R. 2008. İflasın Ertelenmesi Uygulamaları. Bankacılar Dergisi. 67:116- 123. Awad, A. ve R.E. Michael. 2010. Iflas and Chapter 11: Classical Islamic Law and Modern Bankruptcy. The International Lawyer. Pace Law Faculty Publications: 974-1000. http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/749/. (Erişim Tarihi 14.03.2015).
  2. Efrat, R. 2006. The Evolution of Bankruptcy Stigma. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 7(2): 365-393.
  3. Ergin, M.E. 2009. İşletmelerde Finansal Başarısızlık Olasılığının Erken Tanısı: İMKB Uygulaması. Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi,
  4. Kocaeli. Ermenek, İ. 2008. İflasın Ertelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  5. Ankara.
  6. Gilson, S.C., 2001. Creating Value Through Corporate Restructuring: Case Studies in Bankruptcies, Buyouts, and Breakups. John Wiley & Sons. Gratzer, K. ve D. Stiefel. eds. 2008. History of Insolvency and Bankruptcy from an International Perspective. Södertörns Högskola. Hotchkiss, W.H., 1898. Bankruptcy Laws, Past and Present. The North American Review. 167(504): 580-591.
  7. Levinthal, L.E. 1918. The Early History of Bankruptcy Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. 66(5/6): 223-250.
  8. Levinthal, L.E. 1919. The Early History of English Bankruptcy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. 67(1): 1-20.
  9. Martin, N. 2005. The Role of History and Culture in Developing Bankruptcy and Insolvency Systems: The Perils of Legal Transplantation. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. 28(1): 1-78.
  10. Nishimoto, A.S., 2013. Shifting Paradigms Within Corporate Bankruptcy Law: The History and Future of Chapter 11 and Its Global Effects on Business Restructurings. Creighton International and Comparative Law Journal. 5: 102-111.
  11. Öztek, S. 2006. İflasın Ertelenmesi. Bankacılar Dergisi. 59:39-83.