Journals / Livestock Studies / 2018 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Water Buffalo Holdings in Yozgat Province in terms of Environmental Factors Affecting Animal Welfare

Pages
67–76
Publication Date
2018-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that, the existing farm standards in buffaloes holdings concerning to the resource-based and management-based factors affecting animal welfare were satisfactory with respect to good feeding principles but were poor for both of the good housing and good health principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has been conducted to assess resource-based and management-based factors affecting animal welfare in water buffalo husbandry holdings in Yozgat province in order to obtain basic data for a water buffalo welfare assessment protocol to be developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An measurement, observation and evaluation form was developed to obtain the data by using that the results of studies recently published on water buffalo health and welfare and the dairy cattle assessment protocols the Welfare Quality® and AssureWel and the Unified Field Index protocol.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that, the existing farm standards in buffaloes holdings concerning to the resource-based and management-based factors affecting animal welfare were satisfactory with respect to good feeding principles but were poor for both of the good housing and good health principles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yozgat province · holdings · environmental factors

Özet

This study has been conducted to assess resource-based and management-based factors affecting animal welfare in water buffalo husbandry holdings in Yozgat province in order to obtain basic data for a water buffalo welfare assessment protocol to be developed. An measurement, observation and evaluation form was developed to obtain the data by using that the results of studies recently published on water buffalo health and welfare and the dairy cattle assessment protocols the Welfare Quality® and AssureWel and the Unified Field Index protocol. One hundred thirty holdings in Yozgat province and districts were visited and resource-based and management-based measurements and evaluations were made according to the developed measurement, observation and evaluation form and face to face interviews with business owners and employees were carried out. It was observed that water buffalo husbandry holdings were small and medium scale and the animal husbandry was implemented traditionally. As a result, it was found that, the existing farm standards in buffaloes holdings concerning to the resource-based and management-based factors affecting animal welfare were satisfactory with respect to good feeding principles but were poor for both of the good housing and good health principles. Besides, it was concluded that the farm owners and workers did not have sufficient knowledge and skills in of the development and implementation of sustainable animal welfare management strategies in buffalo farms.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, Y., BOZKURT, Z., TEKERLİ, M. (2018). Evaluation of Water Buffalo Holdings in Yozgat Province in terms of Environmental Factors Affecting Animal Welfare. Livestock Studies, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 67–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/228358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anonymous (1995): Model code of practice for the welfare of animals— Farmed buffalo, prepared for the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management, published by CSIRO, 1995, SCARM Report Series No. 52
  2. Anonymous (2011): Çiftlik Hayvanlarının Refahına İlişkin Yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete No: 28151, 23 Aralık 2011
  3. Bharti PK, Dutt T, Patel BHM, Pandey HO, Tomar AKS (2015): Does age at weaning influences behaviour of Murrah buffalo calves under semi-intensive management conditions?. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85 (9): 1031–1036
  4. Borghese A (2013): Buffalo livestock and products in Europe. Scient. Bull. Escorena, 3: 47-73
  5. Borghese A, Mazzi M (2005): Buffalo population and strategies in the world. In: Borghese, A. (Ed.), Buffalo production and research. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 1–39
  6. Botreau R, Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bracke MBM, Keeling LJ (2007): Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Anim. Welfare, 16: 225–228
  7. Capdeville J, Veissier I (2001): A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observations. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A, 51: 62–68
  8. Carvalhal MVL, Sant’Anna AC, Páscoa AG, Jung J, Costa MJRP (2017): The relationship between water buffalo cow temperament and milk yield and quality traits. Livestock Science, 198: 109-114
  9. Colditz IG, Ferguson DM, Collins T, Matthews L, Hemsworth PH (2014): A prototype tool to enable farmers to measure and improve the welfare performance of the farm animal enterprise: The Unified Field Index. Animals, 4(3):446-462
  10. De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Grasso F, Pacelli C, Bordi A (2005): On the development of a monitoring scheme of buffalo welfare at farm level. Ital.J.Anim.Sci.,(4):115-125
  11. De Rosa G, Napolitano F, Saltalamacchia F, Bilancione A, Sabia E, Grasso F, Bordi A (2007): The effect of rearing system on behavioural and immune responses of buffalo heifers. Ital J Anim Sci, (2):1260-1263
  12. Di Palo R, Midea D, Campanile G, Rossi N, Zicarelli L (2001): Influence of management system on reproductive activity of dairy buffaloes during the hot season. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Buffalo Congress, 2001, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Maracaibo: WBC. pp. 130-136
  13. FAO (2015): FAO statistical pocketbook world feed and agriculture 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
  14. Gaughan J, Mader T, Holt S, Lisle AA (2008): A new heat load i