Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length and bishop score in predicting successful labor Induction

Pages
171–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bishop score and cervical length may contribute in the prediction of the mode of delivery and induction to delivery interval.Among women with unfavourable cervix (bishop score of <5), transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length may be an effective method in management of travay and obstetric prognoses, if the reasons for the induction are as postdate pregnancy, preeclampsi, etc.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: to investigate whether transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement or Bishop score could predict better successful induction of labor STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study recruited women with singleton gestations (42.4% were nulliparaus, 57.7% were multiparous) scheduled for induction of labor at >37 week.Transvaginal ultrasound and digital vaginal examinations were performed on 92 women, immediately before labor induction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: Vaginal delivery occured in 77.2% of the patients (71); the remaining 22.8% underwent cesarien delivery (21).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bishop score and cervical length may contribute in the prediction of the mode of delivery and induction to delivery interval.Among women with unfavourable cervix (bishop score of <5), transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length may be an effective method in management of travay and obstetric prognoses, if the reasons for the induction are as postdate pregnancy, preeclampsi, etc.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ultrasonografi · prenatal · Sezaryen

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate whether transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement or Bishop score could predict better successful induction of labor STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study recruited women with singleton gestations (42.4% were nulliparaus, 57.7% were multiparous) scheduled for induction of labor at >37 week.Transvaginal ultrasound and digital vaginal examinations were performed on 92 women, immediately before labor induction. Each by operators masked to the other measurement. İnduction of labor was performed according to our labor induction protocol as intravenous oxytocin.Data were collected on parity, gestational age, mode of delivery, BMI, induction-to-delivery interval,Bishop score and cervical length measurement. RESULTS: Vaginal delivery occured in 77.2% of the patients (71); the remaining 22.8% underwent cesarien delivery (21). In 75 (77.3%) of these, delivery was within 12 h of induction. With mode of delivery used as primary outcome, women with a cervical length <26 mm were more likely to be delivered vaginally (p<0.001) as were women with a Bishop score >5 (p<0.001) A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) constructed to determine the best threshold value of Bishop score and cervical length to predict the vaginal delivery within 12 hours. These two curves were similarly shallow.The curve for the Bishop score showed an optimized cut off value of 5,corresponding to a sensitivity of 71.9%,specificity of 77.1%. The curve for sonographic measurement of cervical lenght showed an optimized cut off value of 26 mm corresponding to a sensitivity of 73.9% and specificity of 80% Both Bishop score and cervical lenght showed a linear correlation with duration of labor (r= -0.70, r= 0.65 respectively). When a logistic regression model was constructed, only Bishop score and BMI were independent predictors of mode of delivery (p=0.045, p=0.028 respectively) CONCLUSION: Our study has demonsrated that induction to delivery interval significantly associated with both preinduction Bishop score and sonographically measured cervical lenght. Both sonographic cervical assessment and the Bishop score successfully predicted vaginal delivery within 12 h. Bishop score and cervical length may contribute in the prediction of the mode of delivery and induction to delivery interval.Among women with unfavourable cervix (bishop score of <5), transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length may be an effective method in management of travay and obstetric prognoses, if the reasons for the induction are as postdate pregnancy, preeclampsi, etc.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEVEER, R., UĞUR, M., TAFLAN, S., HASÇELİK, N. K., UYGUR, D., MUNGAN, T. (2005). Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length and bishop score in predicting successful labor Induction. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 171–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/227568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery:a review of 7001 consecutive inductions.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:628-33
  2. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL.Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:600-7. 3.Royal Collage of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Induction of labour.In Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9. London:RCOG Clinical Support Unit, 2001. 4.Arulkumaran S, Gibb DM, Tombyraja RL, Heng SH, Ratnom SS. Failed induction of labour. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 25:190-3. 5.Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term(Cochrene Review). In The Cochrane Library, issue 2,2003; http:// www.update/software.com (Accessed 3 January 2003). 6.Friedman EA, Niswander KR, Çayonet-Rivera NP, Sachtleben MR. Relation of prelabour evaluation to inducibility and the course of labour. Obstet Gynecol 1966; 28:495-501. 7.Hughey MJ, McElin TW,Bird CC. An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 48:635-41. 8.Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A. Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27:309-11. 9.Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length.Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:214-8. 10.Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Edmonds DK, Rodeck CH. Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 40:17-23. 11.Boozarjamehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of cervix before labor:presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171:1081-7
  3. Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D. Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88:990-2. 13.Gonen R. Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score:Eur J Utrasound 1998; 7:183-7. 14.Munoz H, Diaz C, Lecannelier D, et al. Ultrasound cervix evaluation in the prediction of succesful labor induction (abstract A134) In: Proceeding of the Eighth world Congress of ultrasound in obstetric and Gynecology 1997: Washington D.C. Washington; The Congress; 1997. 15.Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT,Romanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervi