Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2004 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): Estradiol level versus follicular scoring system

Pages
179–181
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, both methods had low sensitivity and negative predictive value, therefore were non-reliable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine a threshold level for estradiol (E2) and follicular score to predict OHSS.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design: This prospective study comprised 260 non-IVF induced ovulatory cycles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, both methods had low sensitivity and negative predictive value, therefore were non-reliable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Östradiol · Testlerin kestirim değeri · İleriye dönük çalışma

Abstract

Objective: To determine a threshold level for estradiol (E2) and follicular score to predict OHSS. Study Design: This prospective study comprised 260 non-IVF induced ovulatory cycles. Serum E2 levels were measured. Follicular score was determined taking into consideration the summation of points obtained from both ovaries, as follows: 5 to 8 mm diameter= 1 point; 9 to 12 mm= 1.5 points; 13 to 16 mm= 2 points; >= 17 mm diameter= 3 points. We selected threshold levels for E2 as follows: 1000 pg/ml; 1500 pg/ml; and 2000 pg/ml. And for follicular scores as 20; 25; and 30. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each threshold level. Results: Mild degree of OHSS developed in 21 of 260 cycles (8.1%). The threshold value of 2000 pg/ml for E2 gave 100% specificity and positive predictive value, but sensitivity of 7.69% and negative predictive value of 48.67%. Follicular score of 30 points also yielded 100% specificity and positive predictive value, but sensitivity of 7.55% and negative predictive value of 48.18%. Conclusion: The thresholds value of 30 for follicular score and 2000 pg/ml for E2 gave the best spesificity and positive predictive value in order to predict the development of OHSS. However, both methods had low sensitivity and negative predictive value, therefore were non-reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAY, M. M., KARADENİZ, R. S., YAZ, H., ÇİL, P. A., ÖZTÜRK, Y., HABERAL, A. (2004). Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): Estradiol level versus follicular scoring system. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 179–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/227165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Albert C, Garrido N, Mercader A, et al. The role of endothelial cells in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod 2002; 8:409-18. 2.Gomez R, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 activation induces vascular permeability in hyperstimulated rats and this effect is prevented by receptor blockade. Endocrinology 2002; 143:4339-48. 3.Bellver J, Escudero E, Pellicer A. Bilateral partial oopherectomy in the management of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) Ovarian mutilating surgery is not an option in the management of severe OHSS. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:1363-7. 4.Ellenbogen A, Rosenberg R, Shulman A, et al. A follicular scoring system for monitoring ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome patients based solely on ultrasonographic estimation of follicular development. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:1175-7. 5.Aboulghar M. Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Estradiol level has an important role in the prediction of OHSS. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:1140-1. 6.Orvieto R. Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Challenging the estradiol mythos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:665-7. 7.World Health Organization. WHO Tech Rep Ser 1976: No:514. 8.Shoham Z, Di Carlo C, Patel A, Conway GS, Jacobs HS. It is possible to run a successful ovulation induction program based solely on ultrasound monitoring? The importance of endometrial measurements. Fertil Steril 1991; 56:836-41. 9.Asch RH, Lo HP, Balrnaceda JP, Weckstein LN, Stone SC.Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high-risk groups. Hum Reprod 1991; 6:1395-9.