Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2010 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Role of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for the correction of preexisting corneal astigmatisd

Katarakt cerrahisi sırasında uygulanan limbal Gevşetici kesilerin korneal astigmatizmayı düzeltici etkisi

Pages
138–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Limbal relaxing incision is safe and effective astigmatism correction procedure with predictable results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of limbal relaxing incisions for correction of corneal astigmatism during phacoemulsification surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The records of 38 eyes of 33 patients with 1.5 diopters or higher keratometric astigmatism who had combined cataract surgery and limbal relaxing incisions between 2004 and 2008 were retrospectively rewieved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Limbal relaxing incision is safe and effective astigmatism correction procedure with predictable results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of limbal relaxing incisions for correction of corneal astigmatism during phacoemulsification surgery. Material and Method: The records of 38 eyes of 33 patients with 1.5 diopters or higher keratometric astigmatism who had combined cataract surgery and limbal relaxing incisions between 2004 and 2008 were retrospectively rewieved. LRIs were performed according to Gills nomogram. Keratometry and topography (Topcon KR-7000P) measurements before and 6 months after the surgeries were retrospectively rewieved. A specific vector analysis programme was used for the analyses of astigmatism. Results: The mean values for preoperative and postoperative keratometric astigmatism were 2.60±1.04 D and 1.59±1.17 D, respectively. The mean surgical induced astigmatism was 2.15±1.23 D. Surgically induced astigmatism produced a mean of 1.77±1.13 D flattening in the surgical meridian. The mean change in spherical equivalent was -0.05 D. None othe patients experienced a decreased visual acuity and serious postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion: Limbal relaxing incision is safe and effective astigmatism correction procedure with predictable results.

Özet

Amaç: Fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi sırasında korneal astigmatizmayı düzeltmek için uygulanan limbal gevşetici kesilerin etkinlik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde 2004-2008 yılları arasında , katarakt cerrahisi sırasında limbal gevşetici kesi uygulanmış, keratometrik astigmatizma düzeyi 1.5 dioptri (D) ve üzerinde olan 33 hastanın 38 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Limbal gevşetici kesiler (LGK), Gills nomogramına göre yapıldı. Ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 6. ay keratometri ve topografi (Topcon-KR7000P) verileri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Astigmatizma analizi için eşleştirilmiş örnek t testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası ortalama keratometrik astigmatizma düzeyleri sırasıyla 2.60±1.04 D ve 1.59±1.17 D idi. İndüklenmiş astigmatizma düzeyi 2.15±1.23 dioptri bulundu. İndüklenen astigmatizma, cerrahi meridyende ortalama 1.77±1.13 D düzleşme sağladı. Sferik eşdeğerde ortalama -0.05 D değişiklik saptandı. Hastaların hiçbirinde görme keskinliğinde azalma ve cerrahi komplikasyon izlenmedi. Sonuç: Limbal gevşetici kesi; sonuçları öngörülebilir, güvenli ve etkili bir astigmatizma düzeltme yöntemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, S., AKOVA, A. Y., ÇETİNKAYA, A., BAYAR, S. A., EĞRİLMEZ, S. (2010). Role of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for the correction of preexisting corneal astigmatisd. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 138–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/226926

References (18)

  1. Hoffer KJ.: Biometry of 7500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:360-368
  2. Cataract patients in a defined Swedish population 1986-1990. II. Preoperative observations. Ninn-Pedersen K, Stenevi U, Ehinger B. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72:10-15
  3. Amesbury EC, Miller K.: Correction of astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009:20;19-24
  4. Nichamin LD.: Astigmatism Control. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2006;19:485-493
  5. Till JS, Yoder PR Jr, Wilcox TK, et al.: Toric intraocular lens implantation:100 consecutive cases. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:295-301
  6. Eğrilmez S, Dalkılıç G, Yağcı A.: Astigmatizma analizinde vektöryel analiz programı. T. Oft. Gaz. 2003;33:404-416
  7. Yaycıoğlu RA, Akova YA, Akça S et al.: Astigmatism of the location of clear corneal incision in phacoemulsification of cataract. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:515-518
  8. Kohnen T, Dick B, Jacobi KW.: Comparison of the induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal cataract incisions of different sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:417-424
  9. Lever J, Dahan E.: Opposite clear corneal incisions to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:301-302
  10. Guyton DL.: Prescribing cylinders postoperatively. Year Book Ophtahlmol. 1985;63-66
  11. Lindstrom RL, Lindquist TD.: Surgical correction of postoperative astigmatism. Cornea. 1998;7:138-148
  12. Duffey RJ, Jain VN, Tchah H et al.: Paired arcuate keratotomy; a surgical approach to mixed and myopic astigamtism. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1130-1135
  13. Müller-Jensen K, Fischer P, Siepe U.: Limbal relaxing incisions to correct astigmatism in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 1999;15:586-589
  14. Gills JP.: Reducing pre-existing astigmatism with limbal relaxing incisions. A complete surgical guide for correcting astigmatism. Thorofare, NJ, Slack. 2003;113-116
  15. Miller K.: Reducing pre-existing astigmatism with limbal relaxing incisions. A complete surgical guide for correcting astigmatism. Thorofare, NJ, Slack. 2003;116-118
  16. Bayramlar H, Dağlıoğlu MC, Borazan M.: Limbal relaxing incisions for primary mixed astigmatism and mixed astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:723-728
  17. Budak K, Yılmaz G, Aslan BS, et al.: Limbal relaxing incisions in congenital astigmatism: 6 month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:715-719
  18. Gills JP, Guyton JL.: Reducing pre-existing astigmatism. Cataract Surgery; the