Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of akreos MI-60 intra Ocular lenses ımplantation with microincisional cataract surgery

Akreos MI-60 göz içi lenslerinin biaksiyel küçük kesili katarakt cerrahisi ile yerleştirilmesinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
10–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We deduced with these affirmative results that this lens would be a new promising option in the small incision surgery area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and reliability of Akreos MI- 60 intra ocular lenses (IOL) which may be implanted with biaxial microincisional cataract surgery Materials and Methods: Akreos MI-60 (Bausch & Lomb) IOLs were implanted in 21 eyes of 18 patients using the biaxial microincisional cataract surgery (B-MICS) technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean age of the patients was 55.4±14.1 years and mean follow - up time was 9.61±1.46 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We deduced with these affirmative results that this lens would be a new promising option in the small incision surgery area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and reliability of Akreos MI- 60 intra ocular lenses (IOL) which may be implanted with biaxial microincisional cataract surgery Materials and Methods: Akreos MI-60 (Bausch & Lomb) IOLs were implanted in 21 eyes of 18 patients using the biaxial microincisional cataract surgery (B-MICS) technique. Mean age of the patients was 55.4±14.1 years and mean follow - up time was 9.61±1.46 months. For the postopertative assessment of the patients; anterior segment responses, postoperative visual acuities, contrast sensitivities and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) measurements were accomplished and evaluated. Results: There was no intraoperative complication, except one case in which the IOL could be implanted in the bag, in spite of posterior capsular rupture. Mean best corrected visual acuity was established as 0.94±0.11 (decimal), 0.029±0.059 (log-MAR). Mean contrast sensitivity values were 1.62±0.18, 1.94±0.22, 1.61±0.24 and 1.16±0.28 without glare and 1.59±0.18, 1.84±0.19, 1.54±0.19 and 1.16±0.26 with glare for 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd respectively at the 90th postoperative day. The post operatively measured average incision width was 1,8±0,09 mm (1.7- 2.0 mm), and SIA was calculated as 0.14 @ 68º with the vectorial analysis method. In two cases, anterior chamber membranes were defined, one of them was severe, but both could be cured completely and the IOLs were perfectly centralized in all cases. Conclusion: With the hydrophilic acrylate material and four haptics design Acreos MI-60 IOL enables us to take advantage of B-MICS technique implanting through 1.8 mm and smaller incision widths. We deduced with these affirmative results that this lens would be a new promising option in the small incision surgery area.

Özet

Amaç: Biaksiyel-küçük kesili katarakt cerrahisi ile yerleştirilebilen Akreos MI-60 göz içi lenslerinin etkinlik ve güvenilirliğinin ortaya konması amaçlandı Gereç ve Yöntem: On-sekiz hastanın 21 gözünde Biaksiyel küçük kesili katarakt cerrahisi (B-KKKC) yöntemi ile Akreos MI-60 (Bausch & Lomb) göz içi lensleri (GİL) yerleştirildi. Olguların yaş ortalaması 55.4±14.1, ortalama takip süresi 9.61±1.46 aydı. Hastaların ameliyatlar sonrası yapılan değerlendirilmelerinde, ön segment cevabı, elde edilen görme keskinlikleri, kontrast duyarlılık ölçümleri ve cerrahi nedenli astigmatizma hesaplamaları yapıldı ve değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ameliyatlar sırasında bir olgu dışında komplikasyon gelişmedi, bu olguda arka kapsül ruptürüne rağmen kapsül içi GİL’i yerleştirildi. Hastaların ameliyatlar sonrası ortalama düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği ondalık: 0.94±0.11, log-MAR: 0.029±0.059 olarak saptandı, Ortalama kontrast duyarlılık değerleri ameliyatlar sonrası 90. günde 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd’ler için sırasıyla glaresiz; 1.62±0.18, 1.94±0.22, 1.61±0.24, 1.16±0.28 ve glareli; 1.59±0.18, 1.84±0.19, 1.54±0.19, 1.16±0.26, olarak bulundu. Ameliyatlar sonrası ortalama kesi genişliği 1.8±0.09 mm (1.7-2.0 mm), cerrahi uyarılmış astigmatizma ise vektör analiz yöntemi ile 0.14 @ 68º olarak ölçüldü. Biri şiddetli olmak üzere 2 olguda tedavi ile tamamen düzelen ön kamara membranı izlendi ve tüm olgularda GİL’lerinin mükemmelen santralize olduğu gözlendi. Sonuçlar: B-KKKC tekniğinin bize sağladığı avantajları kullanmamıza olanak verecek nitelikteki, dört haptikli hidrofilik akrilat yapılı Akreos MI-60 GİL’i, 1.8 mm ve altı küçük kesiden yapılabilen ameliyatlarda, verdiği olumlu sonuçlarla, bu alanda yeni bir seçenek olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, İ., Takmaz, T., BAYHAN, H. A. (2009). Evaluation of akreos MI-60 intra Ocular lenses ımplantation with microincisional cataract surgery. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 10–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/226911

References (16)

  1. Shearing SP, Relyea RL, Louiza A et al.: Routine phacoemulsification through a one-millimeter non-sutured incision. Cataract. 1985;2:6-11
  2. Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal AT.: Phaconit and laser phaconit: Lens surgery through a.9 mm incision. In Agarwal S, et al. Phacoemulsification, laser cataract surgery and foldable IOL’s. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 1998;204-216
  3. Alio JL.: What does MICS require? In: Alio JL, Rodriguez Prats JL, Galal A, eds. MICS Micro-incision Cataract Surgery. Miami: Highlights of Ophthalmology. 2004:1-4
  4. Mehta KR, Mehta CK.: 0.7 Bimanual microphaco. In Garg A, Fine IH, Alio JL et al. Mastering the techniques of advanced phaco surgery. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 2008;143-150
  5. Morselli S, Bellucci R.: Advances in fluid dynamics of micro-coaxial incision surgery. In Garg A, Fine IH, Alio JL et al. Mastering the techniques of advanced phaco surgery. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers. 2008;61-66
  6. Osher RH, Injev VP.: Thermal study of bare tips with various system parameters and incision sizes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:867- 872
  7. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y.: Ultrasounic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:81-86
  8. Can İ, Takmaz T, Genç İ.: Half-moon supracapsular nucleofractis phacoemulsification: Safety,efficacy, and functionality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1958-1965
  9. Fine H, Packer M, Hoffman RS.: Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: improved outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1014-1019
  10. Emery JM, Little JH.: Phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts; Surgical techniques, complications and results. St Louis, MO, CV Mosby. 1979;45-49
  11. Cavallini GM, Campi L, Masini C, et al.: Bimanual microphacoemulsification: Prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:387-392
  12. Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S et al.: Phaconit: phacoemulsification through a 0.9 mm. corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1548-1552
  13. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y.: Ultrasounic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:81-86
  14. Alio J, Rodriguez-Pratz JL, Galal A, et al.: Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1997-2003
  15. Osher RH, Injev VP.: Microcoaxial phacoemulsification Part 1: Laboratory studies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:401-407
  16. Osher RH.