SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2007 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Retained lens materials simulating iris mass

Kitle görünümü veren lens bakiyeleri

M. Sinan SARICAOĞLU
Mürşide ERSOY
Defne KALAYCI
Ö. Faruk RECEP
Ahmet KARAKURT
Dilek GÜVEN
Hikmet HASIRİPİ
Pages
55–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both of the cases were operated after a full examination and the masses were detected as the lens remnants remaining for long years inside the eye.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We discussed our approach in two cases having retained lens materials simulating iris masses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We discussed our approach in two cases having retained lens materials simulating iris masses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both of the cases were operated after a full examination and the masses were detected as the lens remnants remaining for long years inside the eye.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erkek · Yaşlı · İris neoplazmları

Abstract

We discussed our approach in two cases having retained lens materials simulating iris masses. Both of the cases were operated after a full examination and the masses were detected as the lens remnants remaining for long years inside the eye.

Özet

İris düzlemi arkasında kitle görünümü veren, muayene ve incelemeleri sonrası yapılan ameliyatlarında, bu kitlelerin uzun yıllar göz içinde kalmış lens bakiyeleri olduğu tespit edilen 2 olguya klinik yaklaşım ve tedavileri tartışıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARICAOĞLU, M. S., ERSOY, M., KALAYCI, D., RECEP, Ö. F., KARAKURT, A., GÜVEN, D., HASIRİPİ, H. (2007). Retained lens materials simulating iris mass. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 55–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/226900

References (7)

  1. Learning DV: Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members. 1994 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:378-385.
  2. Pande N, Dabbs TR: incidence of lens matter dislocation during phacoemülsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:737- 742. LJ Hansson, Larsson J: Vitrectomy for retained lens fragments in the vitreous after phacoemülsification, J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1007-1011. Spencer WH: Ophthalmic pathology: An atlas and textbook, 3rd ed, Philadelphia: WB Sounders. 1985;473-475.
  3. Hutton WL, Fuller DG: Retained lens material. İn: Tasman W, ed. Duane's Ophthalmology, vol 6, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Roven. 1998;Record 77366. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2003-2004, Section 11, 176-177.
  4. Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE: Clinical Features and Out­ comes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients with Retained Lens Fragments. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1567-1572. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2003-2004, section 4, 227-228.
  5. Hamburg A, Van Bijsterveld OP: Delayed lens-induced inflamma­ tion, Ophthalmologica. 1988,196:126-131.
  6. Finger PT, McCormic SA, Lombardo J: Epithelial inclusion cyst of the iris. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995,113:777-780.
  7. Olsen TW, Lim Jl, Grossniklaus HE. Retained lens material masqu­ erading as a growing, pigmented iris tumour. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996,114:1154-1155.