Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2008 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Seton implants in glaucoma surgery

Glokom cerrahisinde seton implantları

Pages
63–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this review is to compare the various glaucoma drainage implants in use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Glaucoma drainage implants are being increasingly utilized in the surgical management of glaucoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Glaucoma drainage implants are being increasingly utilized in the surgical management of glaucoma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this review is to compare the various glaucoma drainage implants in use.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glokom · Göz içi basınç · Oftalmolojik cerrahi işlemler

Abstract

Glaucoma drainage implants are being increasingly utilized in the surgical management of glaucoma. The purpose of this review is to compare the various glaucoma drainage implants in use.

Özet

Glokom drenaj implantları glokomun cerrahi tedavisinde giderek artan bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı günümüzde kullanılan çeşitli glokom drenaj implantlarının incelenmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALVAÇ, I. S., KULAÇOĞLU, N. D. (2008). Seton implants in glaucoma surgery. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/226861

References (17)

  1. Yalvaç IS.: Glokomda Seton implantları. I. Uygulamalı glokom cerrahisi sempozyumu kitabı (eds) Turaçlı E, Tamçelik N. Doyuran Matbaası 1999 sayfa 92-105
  2. Yalvaç IS.: Seton Ameliyatları. Glokom (eds) Turaçlı ME, Önol M, Yalvaç IS. SFN Yayıncılık 2003 sayfa 243-250
  3. Ayyala RS, Harman LE, Stevens S, et al.: Comparision of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117:233-236
  4. Eisenberg DL, Koo EY, Hafner G, Schuman JS.: In vitro flow properties of glaucoma implant devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30:662-667
  5. Ayyala RS, Margo CE, Michelini-Norris MB, et al.: Comparision of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices:Part 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1081-1084
  6. Lim KS, Allan BD, Lloyd AW, et al.: Glaucoma drainage devices; past, present and future. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1083-1089
  7. Schwartz KS, Lee RK, Gedd SJ.: Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparision of types. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:181-189
  8. Batman A, Batman C, Zilelioğlu O, ve ark.: Neovasküler glokomda Molteno tüp implantasyonu. T Klin Oftalmol. 1996;5:77-79
  9. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Monshizadeh R, et al.: Comparision of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33:94-101
  10. Broadway DC, Iester M, Schulzer M, et al.: Survival analysis of Molteno tube implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:689-695
  11. Lee D, Shin DH, Birt CM, et al.: The effect of adjunctive Mitomycin-C in Molteno implant surgery. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:2126-2135
  12. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Alexander P.: Molteno tube implantation for neovascular glaucoma. Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:897-902
  13. Mills RP, Reynolds A, Emond MJ, et al.: Long-term survival of Molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:299-305
  14. Şatana B, Yalvaç IS, Kasım R, ve ark.: İleri glokom olgularında Molteno tüp ve Ahmed valv implantının klinik sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. T Oft Gaz. 2002;32:100-106
  15. Sidoti PA, Dunphy TR, Baerveldt G, et al.: Experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma implant in treating neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1107-1118
  16. WuDunn D, Phan AD, Cantor LB, et al.: Clinical experience with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 glaucoma implant. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:766-772
  17. Tsai JC, Johnson CC, Kamer JA, et al.: The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma II: longer-term outcom