In this review we will especially focus on pseudophakic monovision , dominant eye concept, patient selection and practice.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Presbyopia,as a result of near sight disturbance can be corrected by treatment modalities such as eyeglasses, contact lenses , refractive surgery or intraocular lenses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Presbyopia,as a result of near sight disturbance can be corrected by treatment modalities such as eyeglasses, contact lenses , refractive surgery or intraocular lenses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review we will especially focus on pseudophakic monovision , dominant eye concept, patient selection and practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Presbyopia,as a result of near sight disturbance can be corrected by treatment modalities such as eyeglasses, contact lenses , refractive surgery or intraocular lenses. In this review we will especially focus on pseudophakic monovision , dominant eye concept, patient selection and practice.
Özet
Yakın görme probleminin akomodasyon kaybı nedeni ile ortaya çıktığı durum olan presbiyopinin düzeltilmesinde gözlük, kontakt lens kullanımı, kornea ve göz içi lensine yönelik cerrahiler gibi seçenekler mevcuttur. Bu yazıda baskın göz kavramı, hasta seçimi ve uygulama açısından ağırlıklı olarak psödofakik monovizyon üzerinde durulacaktır.
🔖
Cite This Article
BAYKARA, M., AMUK, N. (2011). Monovision. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 21–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/226828
References (20)
Garland M A.: Monovision and related techniques in the management of presbyopia. CLAO J. 1987;13:179-181
Goldberg D B.: Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract. Surg. 2011;27:1449-1455
Miranda D, Krueger R R.: Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopicpatients. J. Refract. Surg. 2004;20:325-328
Levinger E, Geyer O, Baltinsky Y, et al.: Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Harefuah. 2006;145:186-187
Kullman G, Pineda R.: 2nd Alternative applications of the femtosecond laser in ophthalmology. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010;25:256-264
Morgan P B, Efron N. Contact lens correction of presbyopia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:191-219
Giles G.:The Practice of Orthoptics. Hammond & Company, London. 1949;78-85
Charnwood L.:Observations on ocular dominance. Optician. 1949;118:85-96
Walls G L.: A theory of ocular dominance. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1951;45:387-412
Ogle K N.: Ocular dominance and binocular retinal rivalry. In: Chapter 18. The Eye (ed. H. Davson), Academic Press, New York. 1962;409-417
Humphriss D.:The measurement of sensory ocular dominance and its relation to personality. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 1969;46:603-616
Francis J L., Harwood K A.: The variation of the projection centre with differential stimulus and its relation to ocular dominance. In: Transactions of the International Optical Congress, British Optical Association, London. 1951:75-87
Barbeito R.: Sighting dominance: an explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vis. Res. 1981;21:855-860
Barbeito R., Simpson T L.: The relationship between eye position and egocentric visual direction. Percept. Psychophys. 1991;50: 373-382
Dengis C A, Steinbach M G, Goltz H C, et al.: Visual alignment from the midline: a declining developmental trend in normal, strabismic, and monocularly enucleated children. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus. 1993;30:323-326
Evans B J W.: Dyslexia and vision. Whurr, London. 2001;212-217
Ooi T L, He Z J.: Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention