Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4

Comparision of leishmania sp. DNA’s isolated in the regions of Çukurova and Şanlıurfa with the restriction endonucleases

Çukurova ve Şanlıurfa bölgelerinde deri lezyonlarından izole edilen leishmania sp. DNA’larının restriksiyon endonükleazlarla karşılaştırılması

Pages
21–27
Publication Date
2004-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction technique should be applied for the identification

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Leishmaniasis is widely seen in tropical and subtropical regions of the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The samples of 39 DNA isolated from 18 of Çukurova, 7 of Şanlıurfa regions, and 14 of reference strain have been compared with RFLP Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis and the cutaneous Leishmania samples isolated from Çukurova have been designated more heterogenicity than Leishmania samples taken from Şanlıurfa region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction technique should be applied for the identification
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Jel elektroforezi · Restriksiyon endonükleaz · RFLP analizi

Abstract

Objective: Leishmaniasis is widely seen in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Today, DNA-based techniques are used in the identification of Leishmania sp. beside microscopic techniques. In this study, it has been aimed whether there are genotypic differences among Leishmania strains isolated from cutaneous lesions in Çukurova and Şanlıurfa regions. Materials-Methods: The samples taken by needle aspiration from the edges of skin lesion have been inoculated to change to promastigotes in NNN medium. After the promastigote culture was achieved for the large volume, DNAs from promastigotes have been isolated and they have been cut with the restriction endonucleases, such as Eco RI, Hind III, Hae III, Hinf I, Alu I, and Rsa I, and their profiles obtained on agarose gel have been compared. Results: The samples of 39 DNA isolated from 18 of Çukurova, 7 of Şanlıurfa regions, and 14 of reference strain have been compared with RFLP Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis and the cutaneous Leishmania samples isolated from Çukurova have been designated more heterogenicity than Leishmania samples taken from Şanlıurfa region. Conclusions: The genotypic differencies have been determined among the cutaneous Leishmaniasis agents isolated from either regions. PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction technique should be applied for the identification

Özet

Amaç: Leishmaniasis, dünyanın tropikal ve subtropikal bölgelerinde yaygın olarak görülmektedir. Leishmania türlerinin tiplendirilmesinde, günümüzde klasik mikroskobik teknikler yanında DNA’ya dayalı teknikler kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Çukurova ve Şanlıurfa bölgeleri deri lezyonlarından izole edilen Leishmania suşları arasında genotipik farklılıkların olup olmadığını saptamak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç-Yöntem: Hastaların deri lezyonu kenarlarından iğne aspirasyonu ile alınan örnekler NNN besiyerine ekilerek promastigotlar elde edilmiştir. Büyük hacimde promastigot kültürü yapıldıktan sonra promastigotlardan DNA izole edilmiş ve DNA; Eco RI, Hind III, Hae III, Hinf I, Alu I ve Rsa I restriksiyon endonükleazları ile kesilmiş ve agaroz jelinde elde edilen DNA profilleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: 18’i Çukurova, 7’si Şanlıurfa bölgelerinden elde edilen suşlardan ve 14 referans suştan izole edilen toplam 39 DNA örneği RFLP Restriction fragment lengt polymorphisms analizi ile karşılaştırılmış ve Çukurova bölgesinden izole edilen deri Leishmania örneklerinin, Şanlıurfa bölgesi Leishmania örneklerinden daha heterojen oldukları belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Her iki bölgeden izole edilen cutaneous leishmaniasis etkenleri arasında genotipik farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Tiplendirme için, PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction tekniğinin uygulanması şarttır

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLMEÇ, F., MATUR, A., UZUN, S., KARAKAŞ, M., MEMİŞOĞLU, H. R. (2004). Comparision of leishmania sp. DNA’s isolated in the regions of Çukurova and Şanlıurfa with the restriction endonucleases. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4, 21–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/22677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Memişoğlu HR, Kotoğyan A, Acar MA ve ark: Leishmaniasis. Tüzün Y, Kotoğyan A, Aydemir EH ve ark (eds): Dermatoloji, 2.baskı, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, Istanbul, 1994, 221-231. van Eys GJJM, Schoone GJ, Lighthart GS, et al: Identification of world leishmania by DNA recombinant probes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, 1989; 34: 53-62.
  2. Kreutzer RD, Grogl M, Neva FA, et al: Identification and genetic comparition of leishmanial parasites causing viscerotropic and cutaneous disease in soldiers returning from operation desert storm. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1993; 49(3): 357-363.
  3. Guessous N, Berrag B, Riyad M, et al: Short report: L.tropica etiologic agent of a case of canine visceral leishmaniasis in Northern Morocco. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1997; 57(2): 172-173.
  4. Hashiguchi Y, Gomez EA, De Coronel VV, et al: Andean leishmaniasis in Ecuador caused by infection with Leishmania mexicana and Leishmania major-like parasites. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1991; 44(2): 205-217.
  5. Momen H, Grimaldi JrG, Pacheco RS, et al: Brazilian leishmania stocks phenotypically similar to L.major. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1985; 34(6): 1076-1084.
  6. Beverley SM, Ismach RB, McMahon-Pratt D: Evoluation of genus leishmania as revealed by comparisons of nuclear DNA restriction fragment patterns. Proc Natl Sci USA, 1987; 84: 484-488. Guizani I, van Eys GJJM, Ben Ismail R, et al: Use of recombinant DNA probes for species identification of world leishmania isolates. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1994; 50(5): 632-640.
  7. Zvala-Castro J, Velasco-Castrejon O, and Hernandez R: Molecular characterization of mexican stocks of Trypanosoma cruzi using total DNA. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1992; 47(2): 201- 209. Berzunza-Cruz M, Bricaire G, Zuluoaga Romero SZ, Perez-Becker R, Saavedra-Lira E, Perez-Montfort R, Crippa-Rossi M, Velasco- Castrejon O, and Becker I. Leishmania mexicana mexicana: Genetic Heterogeneity of Mexican. Isolates Revealed by Restriction Length Polymorphism Analysis of Kinetoplast DNA. Experimental Parasitology, 2000; 95: 277–284.
  8. Jackson PR, Wohlhieter JA, Jackson JE, et al: Restriction endonuclease analyses of leishmania kinetoplast DNA characterizes parasites responsible for visceral and cutaneous disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1984; 33(5): 808-819.
  9. Lu HG, Zhong L, Guan L, et al: Separation of Chinese leishmania isolates into five genotypes by kinetoplast and chromosomal DNA heterogeneity. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1994; 50(6): 763-770.
  10. Reiner NE, Lo R, Llanos-Cuentas A, et al: Genetic heterogeneity in Peruvian leishmania isolates. Am. J Trop