SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2007 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Surgical treatment of presbyopia and multifocal intraocular lenses: Transitioning from cataract to refractive intraocular lens surgery

Presbiyopinin cerrahi tedavisi ve multifokal göz içi lenslerinin yeri: Katarakt cerrahisinden refraktif göz içi lensi cerrahisine geçiş

İzzet CAN
Pages
1–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, various presbyopia correcting techniques, especially multifocal lenses are put forward with its pros and cons, patient selection criteria, points to pay attention before and during surgery, concepts which come out with these procedures like “mix and match” and “neural adaptation” are reviewed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Currently, within numerous techniques for correction of presbyopia, particulary with the contribution of multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses, cataract surgery is becoming refractive surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Currently, within numerous techniques for correction of presbyopia, particulary with the contribution of multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses, cataract surgery is becoming refractive surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, various presbyopia correcting techniques, especially multifocal lenses are put forward with its pros and cons, patient selection criteria, points to pay attention before and during surgery, concepts which come out with these procedures like “mix and match” and “neural adaptation” are reviewed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akomodasyon · oküler · Uyum

Abstract

Currently, within numerous techniques for correction of presbyopia, particulary with the contribution of multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses, cataract surgery is becoming refractive surgery. In this article, various presbyopia correcting techniques, especially multifocal lenses are put forward with its pros and cons, patient selection criteria, points to pay attention before and during surgery, concepts which come out with these procedures like “mix and match” and “neural adaptation” are reviewed.

Özet

Günümüzde presbiyopi düzeltilmesinde kullanılan bir çok tekniğin içinde, özellikle multifokal ve akomodatif lenslerin de katkısıyla, katarakt cerrahisi refraktif bir cerrahi haline dönüşmektedir. Bu derleme ile kullanılan çeşitli presbiyopi düzeltici teknikler ve özellikle multifokal lensler artı ve eksileriyle ortaya konmaya çalışılmış, hasta seçim ölçütleri, ameliyatlar öncesinde ve sırasında dikkat edilecek hususlar, bu ameliyatlarla ortaya çıkan “mix and match”, “nöral adaptasyon” türü yeni kavramlar gözden geçirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, İ. (2007). Surgical treatment of presbyopia and multifocal intraocular lenses: Transitioning from cataract to refractive intraocular lens surgery. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/226654

References (11)

  1. Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls. Slack Incor, NJ. 2006, Introduction. Coleman DJ: Theory and mechanism of accommodation. In: Bel­ville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;183-189. Helmholtz H: Ueber die Accommodation des Auges. Archiv für Ophthalmologie. 1855,1:1-74. Cramer A: Tijdschrift der maatshappij vor geneeskunde, Neder landish. Lancet. 1851,1:529-578. von Pflugk A: Neue Wege zur Erforschung der Lehre von der Ak-kommodation v.(letze) Mitteilung. Der Glaskörper im akkommo-dierenden Auge. Albrecht Von Grafes Arch Ophthalmol. 1935; 133:545-558 Schachar RA: Zonular function: a new hypotesis with clinical imp­lications. Ann Ophthalmol. 1994;26:36-38.
  2. Rohen JW, Rentsh FJ: Der konstruktive bau des zonulaapparates deim menschen und dessen funktionelle bedeutung: Morpologis che grundlagen fur eine neue akkommodationstheorie. Albrecht Von Grafes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1969,178:1-19. Coleman DJ: On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommo­ dation. Trans Am Soc Ophthalmol. 1986;84:846-868.
  3. Coleman DJ, Fish SK: Presbyopia, accommodation and the ma­ ture catenary. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1544-1551.
  4. Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V: Visual perfor­ mance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:611-615.
  5. Carones F, Davis EA, Pineda-Fernandez A, et al.: Lens extraction / Accommodating IOL for correcting presbyopia. In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;3-20.
  6. Baikoff G, Carones F, Knorz MC, et al.: Lensextraction / Multifo- cal IOL In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;21-39.
  7. Baikoff G, Leccisotti A: Phakic multifocal IOL In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006; 41-55.
  8. Hays JC, Thornton S.: Anterior ciliary sclerotomy In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;59-68.
  9. Hamilton DR, Davidof JM, Maloney RK: Anterior ciliary sclero­ tomy for treatment of presbyopia: a prospective controlled study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:l970-1976.
  10. Pintucci S, Siems J.: Laser presbyopia reversal. In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pearls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;69-84.
  11. Manche E, Pineda-Fernandez A, Schachar RA, et al.: Scleral ex­ pansion bands. In: Belville JK, Smith RJ: Presbyopia surgery. Pe­ arls and pitfalls Slack Incorp, NJ. 2006;85-1 11. Singh