Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2007 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

To evaluate the amount of proptosis caused by injection of retrobulbar anesthetic agent by hertel exophthalmometer

Retrobulber anestezik madde enjeksiyonunun oluşturduğu proptozisin hertel ekzoftalmometre ile incelenmesi

Pages
89–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: It was demonstrated that a significant amount of proptosis was caused by retrobulber anesthesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: It is aimed to evaluate the amount of proptosis caused by injection of retrobulber anesthetic by Hertel exophthalmometer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: One hundred eyes of 100 cases operated under retrobulber anesthesia were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: It was demonstrated that a significant amount of proptosis was caused by retrobulber anesthesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anestezi · Anestezikler · Eksoftalmus

Abstract

Purpose: It is aimed to evaluate the amount of proptosis caused by injection of retrobulber anesthetic by Hertel exophthalmometer. Materials and Methods: One hundred eyes of 100 cases operated under retrobulber anesthesia were investigated. The Hertel exophthalmometric values of the cases were determined before anesthesia. Each patient had 3ml lidocaine as retrobulber injection. Hertel exophthalmometric values were obtained after anesthesia and compared with baseline. Results: In the study group, 54 (54.0%) female and 46 (46.0%) male patients with a mean age of 67.7±10.7 years were considered. All the patients had intraocular surgery (90 cataract surgery, 8 trabeculectomy, 2 secondary IOL implantation). The Hertel exophthalmometric value before injection was 15.73±2.52 mm. Following anesthesia, it was measured 18.37±2.85 mm. There was 2.64±1.15 mm proptosis caused by retrobulber anesthesia (p<0.001). Discussion: It was demonstrated that a significant amount of proptosis was caused by retrobulber anesthesia.

Özet

Amaç: Retrobulber anestezik madde enjeksiyonunun oluşturduğu proptozisin Hertel ekzoftalmometre ile değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Retrobulber anestezi altında intraoküler cerrahi uygulanan 100 hastanın 100 gözü incelendi. Hastaların anestezi öncesi Hertel ekzoftalmometre değerleri kaydedildi. Her hastaya 3 ml lidokain retrobulber olarak uygulandı. Anestezi sonrası ekzoftalmometrik değerler tekrar ölçülüp başlangıç değerleri ile karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışma grubunda yaş ortalaması 67.7±10.7 yıl olan 54 (%54.0) kadın ve 46 (%46.0) erkek hasta değerlendirildi. Hastaların tümüne intraoküler cerrahi uygulandı (90 katarakt cerrahisi, 8 trabekülektomi, 2 sekonder intraoküler lens implantasyonu). Retrobulber anestezi öncesi göz küresinin ekzoftalmometre değeri ortalama 15.73±2.52 mm anestezi sonrası ortalama 18.37±2.85 mm ölçüldü. Retrobulber anestezi ile ortalama 2.64±1.15 mm proptozis meydana geldi (p<0.001). Sonuç: Retrobulber anestezi sonucunda anlamlı derecede proptozis geliştiği gösterildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIKÇIOĞLU, Ö. R., KAYA, Y. Z. (2007). To evaluate the amount of proptosis caused by injection of retrobulbar anesthetic agent by hertel exophthalmometer. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 89–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/226641

References (17)

  1. Mete M, Doğan M, Kaya V ve ark.: Katarakt anketi 2003. Glo-Kat. 2006;1:209-213
  2. Arslan BS: Katarakt ve göziçi lensi cerrahisi In Aydın P, Akova Y: Temel göz hastalıkları,Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara, 2001:204- 226
  3. İçağasıoğlu A, Kubaloğlu A, Kurnaz E ve ark.: İntrakameral lidokain anestezisi ile fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi. MN Oftalmolb 1999;6:315-316
  4. Helena K,Risto JU,EevLiisa M: Topical anesthesia with or without propofol sedation versus retrobulbar / peribulbar anesthesia for cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1372-1379
  5. Duker JS, Belmont JB, Benson WE: Inadvertent globe perforation during retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia.Patient characteristics,surgical management and visual outcome. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:519-526
  6. Edge R, Navon S: Scleral perforation during retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia: risk factors and outcome in 50.000 concecutive injections. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1237-1244
  7. Grizzard WS, Kirk NM, Pavan PR: Perforating ocular injuries caused by anesthesia personel. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1011-1016
  8. Mount AM, Seward HC: Scleral perforations during peribulbar anesthesia. Eye. 1993;7:766-767
  9. Hubber KK, Remky A: Effect of retrobulbar versus subconjunctival anesthesia on retrobulbar hemodynamics. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:719-723
  10. Jurowski P, Gos R, Owczarek G: Eye surface temperature after different techniques of local anesthesia - preliminary report. Klin Oczna. 2004;106:557-560
  11. Davis DB, Mandel MR: Efficacy and complication rate of 16.224 consecutive peribulbar blocks. A prospective multi-center study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:327-337
  12. Jackson K, Vote D: Multiple cranial nevre palsies complicating retrobulbar eye block. Anesth Intensive Care. 1998;26:662-664
  13. Javitt JC, Addiego R, Friedberg HL: Brainstem anesthesia after retrobulbar block. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:718-724
  14. Nicoll JM, Acharya PA, Ahlan K: Central nervous system complications after 6000 retrobulbar blocks. Anesth Analg. 1987; 66:1298-1302
  15. Petersen WC, Yanoff M, Danilenko AM: Complications of local ocular anesthesia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1992;32:23-30
  16. Rosen WJ: Brainstem anesthesia presenting as dysarthria. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1170-1171
  17. Soo KH, Jeong HK, Jeong-Min H: Persistent diplopia after retrobulbar anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1248-1253.