Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

The reliability of biometric measurements taken with IOLMaster in calculation of intraocular lens power

Göz içi lens gücünün hesaplanmasında IOLMaster ile alınan biyometrik ölçümlerin güvenilirliği

Pages
234–237
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The refractive deviation from target value is very small in subjects with axial length between 22–25 mm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the reliability of IOLMaster (Zeiss, Germany) in calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power in subjects who will have phacoemulsification surgery and the relationship between the refractive deviation and the axial length.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study included 80 patients (58 men, 22 women) who has uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery and intracapsular hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Acrysof SA60AT, Alcon®) implantation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The refractive deviation from target value is very small in subjects with axial length between 22–25 mm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the reliability of IOLMaster (Zeiss, Germany) in calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power in subjects who will have phacoemulsification surgery and the relationship between the refractive deviation and the axial length. Materials and Methods: The study included 80 patients (58 men, 22 women) who has uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery and intracapsular hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Acrysof SA60AT, Alcon®) implantation. Before the surgery, a detailed ophthalmological examination was done and the IOL power was calculated with IOLMASTER using SRK II formula. The absolute error, which is the difference between target spherical equivalent (SE) and postoperative 1st month SE was calculated. Multifocal logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the relationship of absolute error with age, axial length, mean keratometry, anterior chamber depth and preoperative astigmatism. A p value less than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.80±11.15 years (24-85 years). The mean axial length was 23.63±0.76 mm (range 22-25 mm) and mean keratometry value was 43.53±1.56 D. Postoperative refraction deviated from expected values -0.92 D and +1.27 D and the mean absolute error was 0.43±0.31 D. Deviation from target refraction was &#8805;+0.50D in 20% of the subjects, between +0.50 and -0.50 D in 68.75% of the subjects, and < -0.50 D in 11.25% of the subjects. Refraction deviation was between +1 D and -1 D in 87.5% of the subjects. In multifocal logistic regression analysis, no relationship could be found between absolute error, age, axial length, mean keratometry and anterior chamber depth (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant relationship between absolute error and preoperative astigmatism (t=-2.25) (p=0.027). Conclusions: The measurements taken with IOLMaster is very reliable. The refractive deviation from target value is very small in subjects with axial length between 22&#8211;25 mm.

Özet

Amaç: Fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi planlanan olgularda göz içi lens (GİL) gücünün hesaplanmasında IOLMaster (Zeiss, Almanya) ile elde edilen sonuçların güvenilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi ve cerrahi sonrasında beklenen refraksiyondan sapma değerlerinin aksiyel uzunluk ile ilişkisinin saptanması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya komplikasyonsuz fakoemülsifikasyon cerrahisi geçiren ve kapsül içi tek parça hidrofobik akrilik GİL (Acrysof SA60AT, Alcon®) implantasyonu uygulanan 58 erkek, 22 kadın toplam 80 olgu dahil edildi. Cerrahi öncesinde olguların tam oftalmolojik muayenesini takiben IOLMaster ile oküler biyometri SRK II formülü kullanılarak GİL gücü hesaplandı. Hedeflenen sferik eşdeğer (SE) ile ameliyat sonrası 1. ayda ölçülen SE arasındaki fark (hata) hesaplandı. Absolü hata ile yaş, aksiyel uzunluk, ortalama keratometri değeri, ön kamara derinliği ve preoperatif astigmatizma arasındaki ilişki çoklu lojistik regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi ve istatistiksel olarak p 0.05). Preoperatif astigmatizma değerleri ile zayıf, fakat anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır (t=-2.25)(p=0.027). Sonuç: IOLMaster ile alınan ölçümler son derece güvenilirdir ve aksiyel uzunluğu 22 ile 25 mm arasında olan hastalarda beklenen refraksiyondaki sapma son derece azdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMIŞ, Ü., KERİMOĞLU, H., BOZKURT, B., ÖZTÜRK, B. T., TURAN, M., ÖZKAĞNICI, A. (2009). The reliability of biometric measurements taken with IOLMaster in calculation of intraocular lens power. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 234–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/226586

References (15)

  1. Madge SN, Khong CH, Lamont M, et al.: Optimization of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:436-438
  2. Olsen T.: Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:125-129
  3. Binkhorst RD.: The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye. Ophthalmic Surg. 1981;12:363-365
  4. Connors R III, Boseman P III, Olson RJ.: Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:235-238
  5. Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, ve ark.: Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1950-1955
  6. Rose LT, Moshegov CN.: Comparison of the Zeiss IOL Master and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:121-124
  7. Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, Dolezal C, ve ark.: Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1886-1893
  8. Hitzenberger CK.: Optical measurement of the axial eye length by laser Doppler interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:616-624
  9. Eleftheriadis H.: IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:960-963
  10. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al.: Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcome analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:239-242
  11. Kiss B, Findl O, Menopace R, et al.: Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometr: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:230-234
  12. Olsen T.: Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85: 84-87
  13. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al.: Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:524-534
  14. Lam AK, Chan R ve Pang PC.: The repeatibility and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:477-483
  15. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F.: Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1961-1968