Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2010 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

New tonometers and the new disscussion at intraocular pressure measurement: Corneal biomechanical properties

Yeni tonometreler ve göz içi basıncı ölçümünde yeni tartışma: Korneanın biyomekanik özellikleri

Pages
67–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the new tonometers will be examined and the relationships between these new tonometric methods and corneal biomechanical properties will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most important issues in glaucoma management is controlling intraocular pressure (IOP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate measurement of IOP with the routine tonometric methods is still controversial.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the new tonometers will be examined and the relationships between these new tonometric methods and corneal biomechanical properties will be discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the most important issues in glaucoma management is controlling intraocular pressure (IOP). At this stage, the accuracy of the IOP before and after the treatment is very critical. Accurate measurement of IOP with the routine tonometric methods is still controversial. In this article, the new tonometers will be examined and the relationships between these new tonometric methods and corneal biomechanical properties will be discussed.

Özet

Glokom tedavisinde en önemli konulardan biri, göz içi basıncının (GİB) kontrol altına alınmasıdır. Bu aşamada tedavi öncesi ve sonrası ölçülen GİB’nın doğruluğu son derece kritiktir. Rutin tonometrik yöntemlerle GİB’nın ne kadar doğru ölçüldüğü konusu halen tartışmalıdır. Bu makalede yeni tonometreler incelenecek ve yeni tonometrik yöntemlerle, korneanın biyomekanik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARICAOĞLU, M. S. (2010). New tonometers and the new disscussion at intraocular pressure measurement: Corneal biomechanical properties. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 67–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/226534

References (14)

  1. Jonas JB, Stroux A, Velten I, et al.: Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1269-1274
  2. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al.: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714-720
  3. Coleman AL, Gordon MO, Beiser JA, et al.: Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Baseline risk factors for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:684-685
  4. Brown KE, Congdon NG.: Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:338-343
  5. Chihara E.: Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008; 53:203-218
  6. Kotecha A.: What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:109-114
  7. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, et al.: Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5337-5347
  8. Luce DA.: Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162
  9. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, et al.: Influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:484-489
  10. Laiguzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, et al.: Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114-118
  11. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN.: Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:567-572
  12. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al.: Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:616-622
  13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, et al.: Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4410-4414
  14. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, et al.: Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer,