Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of risk factors in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (high tension glaucoma) and ocular hypertension

Primer açık açılı glokomlu (yüksek basınçlı glokom) ve oküler hipertansiyonlu hastalarda risk faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
45–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean central corneal thickness in POAG patients was determined lower than in OHT patients and control subjects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors of patients with high tension glaucoma, a subtype of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Forty patients with POAG, 55 patients with OHT, and 40 control subjects were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean central corneal thickness in POAG patients was determined lower than in OHT patients and control subjects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the risk factors of patients with high tension glaucoma, a subtype of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). Material and Methods: Forty patients with POAG, 55 patients with OHT, and 40 control subjects were included in this study. All participants were questioned about risk factors and full ophthalmological examination was performed. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured. Results: There was no significant difference among groups in terms of gender. In POAG and OHT groups, the ratio of positive family history was statistically higher than controls. Positive family history of glaucoma in patients with OHT was significantly higher than with POAG. There was no difference among groups in the incidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and goiter. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in smoking rates. No statistically difference was found between groups in body mass index (BMI) based on weight and height measurements of patients. Among groups, there was no significant difference in ratio of patients with menopause and history of using hormone replacement theraphy. No statistically significant difference was found among three groups in spheric equivalence and the incidence of myopia. Mean CCT were found 523.97±37.33 μm; 546.75±33.55 μm and 558.62±52.35 μm respectively, in POAG, OHT and control group. Conclusion: Family history of glaucoma, a commonly known risk factor, was found significantly higher in percentage in POAG and OHT groups than control group. Mean central corneal thickness in POAG patients was determined lower than in OHT patients and control subjects.

Özet

Amaç: Primer açık açılı glokomun (PAAG) bir tipi olan yüksek basınçlı glokom ve oküler hipertansiyonlu (OHT) hastaların risk faktörlerini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk PAAG, 55 OHT hastası ve glokom tanısı olmayan 40 olgu kontrol grubu olarak çalışmaya alındı. Tüm olguların risk faktörleri sorgulandı. Ayrıntılı oftalmolojik muayeneleri yapıldı ve santral kornea kalınlıkları (SKK) ölçüldü. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında cinsiyet dağılımı yönünden anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu. PAAG ve OHT grubunda pozitif aile hikayesi oranı, kontrol grubuna göre daha yüksekti. Aile hikayesi pozitifliği yönünden OHT grubuyla PAAG grubu arasındaki fark, ista tistiksel olarak anlamlıydı ve OHT grubunda daha yüksekti. PAAG, OHT ve kontrol grupları arasında hipertansiyon, diyabet, koroner arter hastalığı ve guatr sıklığı yönünden anlamlı bir fark saptanmadı. Hasta gruplarının sigara kullanımları karşılaştı rıldığında bulunan fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Hastaların boy ve vücut ağırlığı değerlerinden hesaplanan vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) değerlerinde gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmadı. Kadın olgularda menopoz varlığı ve hormon replasman tedavisi alma hikayeleri karşılaştırıldığında gruplar arası fark anlamlı değildi. Her 3 gruptaki miyopi sıklığı (-1.0 D ve üzeri) ve sferik ekivalan değerlerinin ortalamaları karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Santral kornea kalın lıklarının ortalaması PAAG, OHT ve kontrol grubu için sırasıyla 523.97±37.33 μm; 546.75±33.55 μm ve 558.62±52.35 μm bulundu. PAAG grubundaki hastaların SKK değerleri OHT ve kontrol grubundaki hastalarınkinden anlamlı olarak düşük saptandı. Sonuç: İyi bilinen bir risk faktörü olan aile hikayesi sıklığı çalışmamızda PAAG ve OHT’li hasta gruplarında, kontrol grubuna göre belirgin olarak yüksek saptanmıştır. PAAG hastalarının SKK değerleri önceki çalışmalarla uyumlu olarak OHT ve kontrol grubuna göre düşük bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHLI, E., TEKELİ, O. (2012). Evaluation of risk factors in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (high tension glaucoma) and ocular hypertension. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 45–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/226479

References (16)

  1. Turaclı ME. Açık açılı glokomların epidemiyolojisi ve risk fak törleri. T Klin Oftalmol 2004;13:1-5
  2. Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Rait JL, et al. Five year incidence of open angle glaucoma, the visual impairment project glau coma. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1047-51
  3. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A. Family history and risk of pri mary open angle glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:69-73
  4. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, et al. Central corneal thick ness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001;108:1779-88
  5. Leske MC, Nemesure B, He Q, et al. Risk factors for open angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:918-24
  6. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, et al. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2010-5
  7. Bechetoille A, Bresson Dumont H. Diurnal and nocturnal blood pressure drops in patients with focal ischemic glauco ma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:675-9
  8. AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 12. Baseline risk factors for sustained loss of visual field and visual acuity in patients with advanced glau coma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:499-512
  9. Dielemans I, de Jong PT, Stolk R, et al. Primary open angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure, and diabetes mellitus in the general elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthal mology 1996;103:1271-5
  10. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hyper tension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary-open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-20
  11. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. Diabetes, intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology 1995;102:48-53
  12. Pache M, Flammer J. A sick eye in a sick body? Systemic find ings in patients with primary open ange glaucoma. Surv Oph thalmol 2006;51:179-212
  13. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, et al. Variations in pri mary open angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race:a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4254-61
  14. Wilson MR, Hertzmark E, Walker AM, et al. A case control study of risk factors in open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthal mol 1987;105:1066-71
  15. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Ramrattan RS, et al. Genetic risk of primary open angle glaucoma. Population based familial ag gregation study. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1640-5
  16. Uhm KB, Shin DH. Positive family history of