Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Achieving Target IOP

Pages
60–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Optimal target IOP may be different for different individuals depending on the severity of the disease and should be updated periodically as the disease progress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Evaluation of progression of glaucoma in patients after achieving their target IOP using SAIF target IOP tableMaterials and Methods: This is a retrospective non randomized comparative interventional study that was performed on 216 eyes of 108 patients with Primary open angle (POAG).and Normal tension glaucoma from the outpatient clinics at Fayoum University hospital and MISR University hospital, from 2009 till 2014 .
📊
Key Findings & Data:We calculated the target IOP according to Saif's table4 of prediction and C/D ratio.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Optimal target IOP may be different for different individuals depending on the severity of the disease and should be updated periodically as the disease progress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of progression of glaucoma in patients after achieving their target IOP using SAIF target IOP tableMaterials and Methods: This is a retrospective non randomized comparative interventional study that was performed on 216 eyes of 108 patients with Primary open angle (POAG).and Normal tension glaucoma from the outpatient clinics at Fayoum University hospital and MISR University hospital, from 2009 till 2014 . We calculated the target IOP according to Saif's table4 of prediction and C/D ratio. Patients were classiefied into two groups: Group 1 : achieved target IOP( 48 female& 24 male) patients. Group 2 : didn't achieve target IOP (18 female& 18 male) patients. Results: C/D ratio in group 1 was 0.373 ± 0.179, (ranged 0.3 - 0.8), while group 2: the mean C/D ratio was 0.860 ± 0.103 (ranged 0.6 -0.93) The V.F. difference in group 1: the mean (MD) was -1.90 ±4.92 , (ranged -16.60 to -1.90). and group 2: the mean (MD) was 0.27 ± 1.48 (ranged . -1.90 to 0.03)Conclusion :After comparing mean deviation (MD) difference between two groups we found that there is statistically significant difference between both groups as regard the group that achieved target IOP there was regressive changes or stabilization of the visual field MD . Optimal target IOP may be different for different individuals depending on the severity of the disease and should be updated periodically as the disease progress.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAIF, A. T., SAIF, P. (2017). Achieving Target IOP. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 60–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/226435

References (10)

  1. Tamura H, Kawakami H, Kanamoto T. High frequency of open-angle glaucoma in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's dis- ease, J Neurol Sci 2006; 246: 79-83.
  2. Dipiro J, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et al. Pharmacotherapy: A Patho- physiologic Approach, 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, (2009).
  3. Heiting G, Haddrill M. Glaucoma: Types, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment Available from http://www.allaboutvision.com/ conditions/glaucoma.htm# types of glaucoma. Accessed June,(2015).
  4. Saif SSEH, Saif MYS, Saif AT. Early Detection of Glaucoma, A New Scoring System. Bull Ophthalmol Soc Egypt, 2005; 98: 358. Saif SSEH, Saif MYS, Saif AT. Target IOP What is New; Bull Ophthalmol Soc Egypt, 2006; 99: 445-449.
  5. Saif SSEH, Saif MYS, Saif AT. Glaucoma is it still a dilemma in the 21st century; Bull Ophthalmol Soc Egypt, 2007; 100: 395-399.
  6. Saif SSEH, Saif MYS, Saif AT. Early Detection and Managmant of Glaucoma, A New Scoring System. Highlights of Ophthalmol- ogy 2007; 35: 2-4.
  7. Saif SSEH, Saif MYS, Saif AT. The Glaucoma suspect, the di- lemma. What is new? Bull Ophthalmol Soc Egypt, 2008; 101. Saif MYS, Saif AT, Saif PS, et al. The Glaucoma suspect, the dilemma. What is new? Research in Ophthalmology 2013; (1): 10-14 doi:10.5923/j.ophthal. Burk R, Volcker HE. The concept of the" target IOP" in POAG. What level of intraocular pressure are we aiming at for which type of optic nerve head, Glaucoma World No. 5 (June 1997). Traverso CE. Practical points on the target IOP, Glaucoma World No. 19 (May 2000). Nassar MK. Threshold Amsler Grid testing to detect reserving power of the optic nerve,Bull. Ophthalmol. Soc. Egypt, 1997; 90: 101. EGS Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma 4th edition,; 3.2, 134-138.
  8. Azarbod, P, Crawley, L, Ahmed, F, et al. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Prescriber 2015, 26:21 Nassar MK. Target Intraocular Pressure. Available from http:// www.glaucoma-egypt.org/Glaucoma-news/200102.pdf.accessed (sep 2015).
  9. Kate T, Choudhary R. Validity of Target IOP, AIOC proceedings, Glaucoma session II 231-232, (2005). in Ophthalmology 2013; 2: 4-9 doi:10.5923/j.ophthal.(2013) 02. Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001, 108: 1943-1953
  10. Musch, DC, Gillespie, BW, Niziol, LM, et al. & CIGTS Study Group. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma T