Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Approaches To With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Without Varices

Varis Dışı Üst Gastrointestinal Sistem Kanamalarına Yaklaşım

Pages
46–51
Publication Date
2008-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study was to review the current literature about approaches to a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Upper gastrointestinal system bleedings which account for 85% of all gastrointestinal bleedings form an important clinic and economic problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inspite of the improvements in the diagnostic methods and treatment modalities the mortality rate remained the same.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study was to review the current literature about approaches to a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal system bleedings which account for 85% of all gastrointestinal bleedings form an important clinic and economic problem. Inspite of the improvements in the diagnostic methods and treatment modalities the mortality rate remained the same. There is not a common consensus on the risk scoring, endoscopic treatment, indications of surgical and medical treatment of a patient admitting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to review the current literature about approaches to a patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Özet

Tüm gastrointestinal kanamaların % 85 inden sorumlu olan üst Gastrointestinal Sistem GİS kanamaları, önemli klinik ve ekonomik problem teşkil ederler. Son 5 dekadda tanı ve tedavideki gelişmelere rağmen mortalite oranı aynı kalmıştır. Kliniğe GİS kanama ile başvuran hastalarda riskin belirlenmesi, tedavide endoskopinin yeri, medikal ve cerrahi tedavi endikasyonları hala tartışmalı olup, hastalara yaklaşım ile ilgili net bir ortak görüş yoktur. Bu yazının amacı üst GİS kanamalara yaklaşımın nasıl olması gerektiği konusunda güncel literatür bilgilerini derlemek oldu

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, A., TEMİZ, M., SEMERCİ, E., ÖZKAN, O. V., Sınıflaması, R. (2008). Approaches To With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Without Varices. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 46–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/22636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Jiranek GC, Kozarek RAA. Cost-effective approach to the patient with peptic ulcer bleeding. Surg Clin North Am. 1996; 76:83-103. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60(4):497- 504. Terdiman JP. Update on gastrointestinal breeding. Postgrad Med, 1998; 103: 43– 64 Blocksom JM, Tokioka S, Sugawa C. Current therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(2):186-92.
  2. Lanza, FL. A guideline for the prevention and treatment of NSAID-induced ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998; 93: 2037-2046 6. van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EA, et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(7):1494-9 British Society of Gastroenterology Committee. Endoscopy upper Non-variceal gastrointestinal guidelines. Gut. 2002; 51(4):iv1-6. haemorrhage: 8. Kwan V, Norton ID. Endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(4):222-30.
  3. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000; 356:1318-21.
  4. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996; 38:316-21.
  5. Vreeburg EM, Terwee CB, Snel P, et al. Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 1999; 44:331-5. Guidelines for good practice in and audit of gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Report of a joint working group of the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Audit Unit of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992; 26:281-9. upper 13. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK. Upper Nonvariceal Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 18;139(10):843-57. GI Bleeding 14. Perng CL, Lin HJ, Chen CJ, et al. Characteristics of patients with bleeding peptic endoscopy and aggressive treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994; 89:1811-4.
  6. Savides TJ, Jensen DM. Therapeutic endoscopy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2000; 29: 465–487
  7. Steffes CP, Sugawa C. Endoscopic management gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Surg. 1992; 16: 1025