Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

Fabrication of ear prosthesis: With a different method

Kulak protezi yapımı: Farklı bir teknikle

Pages
122–125
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By using this technique it was determined that the tissue details were reflected to the prostheses with no mistake.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Maxillo-facial prostheses are supportive and a good alternative to surgical reconstruction in the repair of facial defects resulting from congenital, traumatic or infectious etiologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this case report a different technique, which was assessed to decrease the preparation mistakes frequently occuring during the fabrication of these prostheses was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By using this technique it was determined that the tissue details were reflected to the prostheses with no mistake.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Maxillo-facial prostheses are supportive and a good alternative to surgical reconstruction in the repair of facial defects resulting from congenital, traumatic or infectious etiologies. These prostheses have esthetical roles, and fabrication of them is complex and costly. In this case report a different technique, which was assessed to decrease the preparation mistakes frequently occuring during the fabrication of these prostheses was used. By using this technique it was determined that the tissue details were reflected to the prostheses with no mistake.

Özet

Çene-yüz protezleri kalıtsal, travmatik ya da enfeksiyon sebebiyle oluşan yüz defektlerinin kapatılmasında cerrahi uygulamaların destekleyicisi ve iyi bir alternatifidir. Bu protezlerin estetik görevleri vardır ve yapımı karmaşık ve maliyeti yüksektir. Bu olgu sunumunda protezlerin yapımında sıklıkla meydana gelen yapım hatalarını azalttığı değerlendirilen farklı bir teknik uygulanmıştır. Tekniğin uygulandığı olguda elde edilen protezde doku ayrıntılarının hatasız olarak proteze yansıtılabildiği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, A., KARAYAZGAN, B., GÜNAY, Y., DORUK, S. (2009). Fabrication of ear prosthesis: With a different method. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 122–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/226352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Beumer JB, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considera- tions. 3rd ed. Canada, Ishiyaku Euromerica Inc. 1996: 417-449
  2. Thomas KT. Prosthetic Rehabilitation. London, Quintessence Publishing Co., 1994: 69-77
  3. Lai JH, Hodges JS. Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial pros- thetic materials. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 450-455
  4. Wolfaardt JF, Chandler HD, Smith BA. Mechanical prop- erties of a new facial prosthetic material. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 228-234
  5. Takahashi T, Fukuda M, Funaki K, Tanaka K. Magnet re- tained facial prosthesis combined with an implant sup- ported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 805-807
  6. Lemon JC, Martin JW, Chambers MS, Wesley PJ. Technique for magnet replacement in silicone facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 166-168
  7. Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW, Wesley PJ. A hy- brid-mold technique for fabricating facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 53-55.