SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Farklı vertikal iskeletsel paterne sahip Sınıf II maloklüzyonlu hastalarda mini vida yerleşimi açısından güvenli bölgelerin incelenmesi

Evaluation of safe zones for miniscrew placement in Class II patients with different vertical skeletal patterns

Berkay Tolga SÜER
ERSİN YILDIRIM
ŞENİZ KARAÇAY
Mustafa ERKAN
Pages
221–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sex only affects the buccolingual bone distance and it is shorter in girls

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to compare interradicular space, buccolingual alveolar distance, and cortical bone thickness in skeletal Class II patients with long face and short face.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The gender differences were also evaluated. 30 CBCT images obtained from patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups according to patients' facial type. 15 patients (9 girls, 6 boys) with short face comprised SF group and 15 patients (6 girls, 9 boys) with long face comprised LF group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sex only affects the buccolingual bone distance and it is shorter in girls
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare interradicular space, buccolingual alveolar distance, and cortical bone thickness in skeletal Class II patients with long face and short face. The gender differences were also evaluated. 30 CBCT images obtained from patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups according to patients' facial type. 15 patients (9 girls, 6 boys) with short face comprised SF group and 15 patients (6 girls, 9 boys) with long face comprised LF group. Interradicular space, buccolingual bone distance and cortical bone thickness between first and second molars, second premolar and first molar, first and second premolars were examined at four different depths from the alveolar crest. LF and SF groups and gender differences were compared with MannWhitney U test. Interradicular space between mandibular molars and mandibular premolars were smaller in LF group and cortical bone was thicker at some sites in SF group. Girls' buccolingual bone distance was lower than boys' in both maxilla and mandible. Mandibular interradicular space is shorter and cortical bone is thinner in long-faced skeletal Class II patients. Sex only affects the buccolingual bone distance and it is shorter in girls

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, uzun yüz ve kısa yüzlü iskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyonlu hastalarda, kökler arası mesafe, bukko-lingual alveoler mesafe ve kortikal kemik kalınlıklarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Aynı zamanda cinsiyet farklılıkları da incelenmiştir. 30 iskeletsel Sınıf II maloklüzyonlu hastadan elde edilen Konik ışın demetli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (KIBT) görüntüleri hastaların yüz tipine göre iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Kısa yüz grubu 9 kız 6 erkekten oluşurken, uzun yüz grubu ise 6 kız 9 erkekten oluşmaktadır. Ölçümler alt ve üst çene molar ve premolar dişler arasında ve alveol kret tepesinden itibaren 4 farklı derinlikte gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gruplar arası ölçüm farklılıkları Mann-Whitney U testi ile incelenmiştir. Alt çene molar ve premolar dişlerde kökler arası mesafe uzun yüz grubunda daha az iken, kortikal kemik kısa yüz grubunda daha incedir. Cinsiyet sadece bukko-lingual kemik kalınlığını etkilemektedir ve kızlarda her iki çenede de erkeklerden daha incedir

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜER, B. T., YILDIRIM, E., KARAÇAY, Ş., ERKAN, M. (2015). Farklı vertikal iskeletsel paterne sahip Sınıf II maloklüzyonlu hastalarda mini vida yerleşimi açısından güvenli bölgelerin incelenmesi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 221–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/226091

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Park H. The skeletal cortical anchorage using titanium microscrew implants. Korean J Orthod. 1999; 29: 699- 706. Park J, Cho HJ. Three-dimensional evaluation of interra- dicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the place- ment and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 314 e1-12. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major fac- tor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Ort- hod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 68-73.
  2. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 191-197.
  3. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. A radiog- raphic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 832-837.
  4. Chaimanee P, Suzuki B, Suzuki EY. "Safe zones" for mi- niscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal pat- terns. Angle Orthod. 2011;81: 397-403.
  5. Hernandez LC, Montoto G, Puente Rodriguez M, Galban L, Martinez V. 'Bone map' for a safe placement of mi- niscrews generated by computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 576-81.
  6. Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini- implant placement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009; 12: 299- 304. Monnerat C, Restle L, Mucha JN. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of ort- hodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 428 e1-9. Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Kook YA, Nelson G. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary pos- terior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 635-641.
  7. Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for ortho- dontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 939-951.
  8. Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: 495-503.
  9. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL. Orthodontics: cur- rent principles & techniques. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005: 1213. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between fa- cial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the man- dible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68: 557-6