Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

İmplant Destekli Anterior Restorasyonlar: Vaka sunumu

Pages
68–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report, patient with an old anterior fixed prosthetic restoration, presented implication of implant supported prosthetic restoration and the clinical results are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conventional fixed or removable prostheses for the treatment of tooth loss, bone loss continues to be linked to years in edentulous regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Functional stimulation of bone re-formed implant treatment alternatives eliminated this possibility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report, patient with an old anterior fixed prosthetic restoration, presented implication of implant supported prosthetic restoration and the clinical results are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Conventional fixed or removable prostheses for the treatment of tooth loss, bone loss continues to be linked to years in edentulous regions. Functional stimulation of bone re-formed implant treatment alternatives eliminated this possibility. In this case report, patient with an old anterior fixed prosthetic restoration, presented implication of implant supported prosthetic restoration and the clinical results are discussed.

Özet

Diş eksikliklerinin tedavisinde kullanılan sabit ya da hareketli protezlerde, dişsiz bölgede kemik kaybı zamana paralel olarak devam etmektedir. İmplant tedavi alternatifi ile, kemiğin tekrar fonksiyonel stimülasyonlar almasıyla bu ihtimal ortadan kaldırılmaktadır. Vaka sunumunda, eski bir anterior sabit protetik restorasyona sahip hastada, implant destekli protetik tedavinin uygulanması sunulmuş ve klinik sonuçları tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, A., SÜER, B. T. (2015). İmplant Destekli Anterior Restorasyonlar: Vaka sunumu. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 68–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/208479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Weinberg LA. Atlas of tooth and implant supported prost- hodontics. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2003: 47-84. Branemark P-I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 399-410. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St.Louis: Mosby Inc, 1993: 187-189.
  2. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported res- torations in the anterior region: prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 875-83.
  3. Briggs P, Ray-Chaudhuri A, Shah K. Avoiding and mana- ging the failure of conventional crown and bridges. Dent Update 2012; 39: 78-80.
  4. Cordioli GP, Brugnolo E, Mazzocco C, Rossi PC: Esthetic considerations with implant-supported prostheses, in Alb- rektsson T, Zarb GA (eds); The Branemark Osseointegra- ted Implant. Chicago: Quintessence Pub.Co.,Inc., 1989: 221-228.
  5. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerati- ons in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomecha- nical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005: 16: 26-35. Van Steenberghe D. A retrospective multicenter evalua- tion of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures sup- porting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 217-223.
  6. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Erikson AR. The long term efficiacy of currently used dental implants. A re- view and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillo- fac İmplants 1986; 1: 11-15.
  7. Sahin S, Çehreli MC, Yalçın E. The influence of functi- onal forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses-a review. J Dent 2002; 30: 842-845. Saba S. Occlusal stability in implant prosthodontic-clinical factors to consider before implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 522-6.
  8. Sahin S, Cehreli M, Yalcın E. The influence of functi- onal forces on the biomechanics of implant supported prostheses-a review. J Dent 2002; 30: 271-282.