Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopy

Kolonoskopide farklı sedasyon protokollerinin etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
143–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, propofol-ketamine combination for the colonoscopy might be preferable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopyColonoscopy is a procedure for differential diagnosis and treatment of colon diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This prospective randomized study was performed on ASA I-II, 93 patients who underwent colonoscopy procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, propofol-ketamine combination for the colonoscopy might be preferable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopyColonoscopy is a procedure for differential diagnosis and treatment of colon diseases. It is painful and uncomfortable. Sedation is very important for colonoscopy to be successfully completed. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of propofol-fentanyl, propofol-ketamine and propofol- remifentanyl combinations. This prospective randomized study was performed on ASA I-II, 93 patients who underwent colonoscopy procedure. Patients received to propofol-ketamine (n:29) (Group PK), propofol-fentanyl (n: 33) (Group PF) or propofol-remifentanil (n=31) (Group PR). All patients received study drugs till ramsey sedation scale of patients titrated to 3-4. Hemodynamic data, peripheral oxygen saturation, recovey and sedation times, endoscopist and patient satisfaction, side effects of the agents were recorded. Demographic data, hemodynamic data, sedation and recovery times and patient satisfactory were found similar in the three groups( p > 0,05 for all comparisons ). Endoscopist satisfaction was % 100 in Group PK( p: 0.027). Therefore, propofol-ketamine combination for the colonoscopy might be preferable.

Özet

Kolonoskopi kolona ait hastalıkların ayırıcı tanı ve tedavisinde uygulanan bir işlemdir. İşlem ağrılı ve rahatsızlık vericidir. Endoskopinin başarıyla uygulanabilmesi için sedasyon çok önemlidir. Çalışmamızda propofol-ketamin, propofol-fentanil ve propofol-remifentanil kombinasyonlarının etkinliklerini ve yan etkinlerini karşılaştırılmayı amaçladık. Bu randomize, prospektif çalışmaya kolonoskopi yapılması planlanan ASA I-II, 93 hasta dahil edildi. Grup PK'deki hastalara propofol-ketamin (n=29), grup PF'deki hastalara propofol-fentanil (n=33) ve grup PR'deki hastalara propofol-remifentanil (n=31) ile sedasyon uygulandı. Ramsey sedasyon skalası 3-4 olacak şekilde sedasyon uygulandı. Hemodinamik veriler, periferik oksijen saturasyonu, derlenme ve sedasyon süresi, endoskopist ve hasta memnuniyeti, ilaç yan etkileri kaydedildi. Grupların sedasyon ve derlenme süreleri, hemodinamik parametreleri, hasta memnuniyetleri benzer bulundu. Grup PK'da % 100 endoskopist memnuniyeti gözlendi( p: 0.027). Bu nedenle kolonoskopide propofol- ketamin kombinasyonunun tercih edilebileceği kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

DERELİ, N., BABAYİĞİT, M., HORASANLI, E., TUTAL, Z. B., GÜLEÇ, H., GÖKHANER, M. Ş., ALKAN, A., BABAYİĞİT, M. A. (2016). The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopy. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 143–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/225282

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rex DK. Review article: moderate sedation for endoscopy: sedation regimens for non-anaesthesiologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:163-171
  2. Wiggins TF, Khan AS, Winstead NS. Sedation, Analgesia, and Monitoring Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:815-826
  3. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy; guideline. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008;68(5)815-826
  4. Fanti L, Testoni PA. Sedation and analgesia in gastrointestinal endoscopy: What's new? World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(20): 2451-2457 5. Jonghe BD, Cook D,Vecchi CA, Guyatt G, Meade M, Outin H. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med (2000) 26: 275-285
  5. Moerman AT, Foubert LA, Herregods LL et al. Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anesthesia care during colonoscopy.Eur J Anesth 2003;20: 461-6
  6. Greilich PE, Virella CD, Rich JM et al. Remifentanil versus meperidine for monitored anesthesia care: a comparison study in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 80-4
  7. Demiraran Y, Tamer A, Korkut E ve ark. Kolonoskopi yapılan olgularda deksmedetomidin ve midozolam'ın sedatif etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması. Endoskopi 2009;17(1):18-22
  8. Dal H, İzdeş S, Kesimci E, Kanbak O. Kolonoskopide Sedasyon İçin Propofolün Aralıklı Bolus veya Hedef Kontrollü İnfüzyon Yöntemiyle Uygulanmasının Karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2011; 39(3):134-142
  9. Ho WM, Yen CM, Lan CH et all. Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov 21;12:164 11. Türk HŞ, Aydoğmuş M, Unsal O, Köksal HM, Açik ME, Oba S. Sedation-analgesia in elective colonoscopy: propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-alfentanil. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013;63(4):352-7
  10. Rosow C. Remifentanil: a unique opioids analgesic. Anesthesiology 1993;78: 875-6 13. Mirabella, L.; Mollica, G.; Di Monte, P.; Spadaro, S.; Caggianelli, G.; Cinnella, G. Analgosedation for colonoscopy: remifentanil vs propofol: 2AP1-6 European Journal of Anaesthesiology: 2012; 29: 32
  11. Akcaboy Z N, Akcaboy EY, Albayrak D, Altinoren B, Dikmen B, Gogus N. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Aaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2006;40: 736-741
  12. Smith I, Avramov MN, White PF. A compariso