Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Use of Fish Vaccine in Aquaculture

Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliğinde Kullanılan Aşılar

Pages
29–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, routes of administration by injection, immersion and oral delivery of vaccine will also be discussed in this review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the past few decades, the use of vaccines for disease prevention in aquaculture has expanded.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some important disease causing bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. and Yersinşa sp. have been controlled with the use of vaccines.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, routes of administration by injection, immersion and oral delivery of vaccine will also be discussed in this review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aşılama · balık hastalıkları · yetiştiricilik

Abstract

In the past few decades, the use of vaccines for disease prevention in aquaculture has expanded. Some important disease causing bacteria such as Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. and Yersinşa sp. have been controlled with the use of vaccines. This is especially true with the use of adjuvant that helped in the control of Frunkulosis in Fish. There are other studies that reported positive result with the control of bacterial, viral and parasitic diseases using inactive and live inoculums as well as DNA technology. Furthermore, routes of administration by injection, immersion and oral delivery of vaccine will also be discussed in this review.

Özet

Son yıllarda su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinin gelişmesiyle, su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde hastalıkların kontrolü amacıyla aşıların kullanımı da yaygınlaşmıştır. Vibrio sp., Aeromonas sp. ve Yersinia sp gibi patojenlerin neden olduğu önemli bakteriyel hastalıklar aşılama ile etkili bir şekilde kontrol altına alınmıştır. Özellikle adjuvanlı enjeksiyon ile aşılama Furunkulosisin kontrol edilmesinde başarılı olmuştur. Diğer bakteriyel, viral ve paraziter hastalıklar içinde inaktif, canlı ve DNA teknolojisine dayanan aşı çalışmaları yapılmakta ve olumlu sonuçlar alındığı bildirilmektedir. Bu derleme aynı zamanda enjeksiyon, daldırarak ve ağız yoluyla uygulanan aşılama metotlarını da tartışacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

NEARY, E. T., DEVELİ, N., YÜKSEL, S. A. (2008). Use of Fish Vaccine in Aquaculture. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 29–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/224775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, A. and Thompson, K.D. 2006. Biotechnology offers revolution to fish health management. Trends in Biotechnology, 24 (5), 201-205 Anonim, 2002. Safer rules for feed additives-prohibition of antibiotics as grown promoters confirmed 2002_DN:IP/02/1720.(See:http://europa.ae.int/rapid/ start/cgi/) Anonim, 2003. Norwegian antibiotics usage reduced by 98%.http://www.intrafish.com/com/articleID=36685 Anonim., 2006. Responsible use of vaccines and vaccination in fish production. The National Office of Animal Health (NAOH). Anonim, 2008. http://www.thefishsite.com/articles/156/ understanding-fish-vaccination Barug, D., Jong, J., Kies A. K. and Verstegen. M. W.A. 2006. Antimicrobial growth promoters. Where do w ego from here?. Wageningen Academic Publishers. 422 pp. Berg, A., Rodseth, O.M., Hansen, T., 2007. Fish size at vaccination influence the development of side- effects in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture, 265, 9-15.
  2. Bly J.E, Quiniou SM, Clem LW. 1997. Environmental effects on fish immune mechanisms. Development of Biological Standardization, 90, 33-43.
  3. Bondad-Reantaso, M. G., Subasinghe, R. P., Arthur, J. R., Ogawa, K., Chinabut, S., Adlard, R., Tan, Z., Shariff, M. 2005. Disease and health management in Asian Aquaculture. Veterinary Parasitology, 132, 249-272.
  4. Boxaspen, K., 2006. A review of the biology and genetics of sea lice. Ices journal of Marine science, 63(7), 1304-1316.
  5. Bravo S., Midtlyng PJ. 2007. The use of fish vaccines in the Aquaculture, 270, 36-42. 1999-2003.
  6. Brown, L.A., Hunter, D. and Thorarinsson, R., 2003. Fish vaccination-methodologies and outcomes. Fish Veterinary Journal, 7, 56-66.
  7. Daily JG, Griffiths SG, Kew AK, Moore AR & Olivier G (2001). Renibacterium salmoninarum strains and their use as live vaccines. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 44, 121-126. of attenuated Ellis, R.W., 2001. Technologies for the design, discovery, formulation and administration of vaccines. Vaccine, 19, 2681-2687.
  8. Gudding, R., Lillehaug, A., Evensen, Q., 1999. Recent development in fish vaccinology. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 72, 203-212.
  9. Gudmundsottir, B.K., Björnsdottir, B. 2007. Vaccination against atypical furunculosis and winter ulcer disease of fish. Vaccine, 25, 5512-5523.
  10. Hastein, T., Gudding, R., Evensen, Q. 2005. Bacterial Vaccines for Fish-An update of the current situation worldwide. Satandardization, 121, 55-74. in Biological aquaculture. Development in Lan, M.Z., Peng, X., Xiamg, M.Y., Xia, Z.Y., Bo, B., Jie, L., Li,