Journals / Flora İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Investigation and Comparison of Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Community Acquired Pneumonia in terms of Pharmaceutical Care Requirements

Toplumda Gelişen Pnömoni Tanı ve Tedavi Kılavuzlarının Farmasötik Bakım Gereklilikleri Yönünden İncelenmesi ve Karşılaştırılması

Pages
50–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review waswritten to compare five CAP guidelines (British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Euro-pean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Spanish Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Association, Turkish Thoracic Society), to identify and discuss their differences, and to discuss the issues not considered in the guidelines such as drug interactions, dose adjustment in kidney/liver dysfunction, dose adjustment in obesity, serious/common side effects, and pharmacokinetic-pharmaco-dynamic properties of the drugs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in our country and worldwide, and it imposes a serious economic burden on the health system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is major cause of deaths due to infections in our country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review waswritten to compare five CAP guidelines (British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Euro-pean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Spanish Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Association, Turkish Thoracic Society), to identify and discuss their differences, and to discuss the issues not considered in the guidelines such as drug interactions, dose adjustment in kidney/liver dysfunction, dose adjustment in obesity, serious/common side effects, and pharmacokinetic-pharmaco-dynamic properties of the drugs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in our country and worldwide, and it imposes a serious economic burden on the health system. It is major cause of deaths due to infections in our country. Therefore, initiating CAP treatment with the most appropriate antibiotic as soon as possible is important in decreasing morbidity and mortality. For this purpose, many evidence-based guidelines have been created to assist physicians in the selection of antibiotics and to reduce the differences between clinical practices. Although these guidelines mainly have common content and recommendations, there are some differences according to the health systems of the countries. In addition, the guidelines contain a number of shortcomings and issues not addressed. This review waswritten to compare five CAP guidelines (British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Euro-pean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Spanish Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Association, Turkish Thoracic Society), to identify and discuss their differences, and to discuss the issues not considered in the guidelines such as drug interactions, dose adjustment in kidney/liver dysfunction, dose adjustment in obesity, serious/common side effects, and pharmacokinetic-pharmaco-dynamic properties of the drugs.

Özet

Toplumda gelişen pnömoni (TGP) ülkemizde ve dünya çapında önemli bir morbidite ve mortalite nedenidir ve sağlık sistemi için ciddi bir ekonomik yük getirmektedir. Ülkemizde infeksiyonlara bağlı ölümler arasında ilk sıralarda yer almaktadır. Bu nedenle TGP tedavisi-nin, mümkün olan en kısa sürede ve en uygun antibiyotik ile başlatılması morbidite ve mortaliteyi azaltmakta önem taşımaktadır. Bu amaçla hekimlere antibiyotik seçiminde yardımcı olmak ve klinik uygulamalar arasındaki farklılıkları azaltmak için çok sayıda kanıta dayalı kılavuz oluşturulmuştur. Bu kılavuzlar temelde ortak içerik ve önerilere sahip olmakla birlikte ülkelerin sağlık sistemlerine göre birtakım farklılıklar barındırmaktadır. Ayrıca, kılavuzlarda birtakım eksiklikler ve ele alınmayan konular yer almaktadır. Bu derleme, beş TGP tedavisi kılavuzunun (İngiliz Toraks Derneği, İngiltere Ulusal Sağlık ve Klinik Mükemmellik Enstitüsü, Avrupa Klinik Mikrobiyoloji ve İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları Derneği, İspanyol Pnömoloji ve Göğüs Cerrahisi Derneği, Türk Toraks Derneği kılavuzları) karşılaştırılması, farklılıklarının belirlenerek tartışılması ve kılavuzlarda değerlendirilmeyen ilaç etkileşimleri, böbrek/karaciğer fonksiyon bozukluğunda doz ayarlaması, obezitede doz ayarlaması, ciddi/yaygın yan etkiler, ilaçların farmakokinetik-farmakodinamik özellikleri gibi konuların tartışılması amacıyla yazılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAP, M., KARA, E., ER, A. G., DEMİRKAN, K., ÜNAL, S. (2021). Investigation and Comparison of Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Community Acquired Pneumonia in terms of Pharmaceutical Care Requirements. Flora İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 50–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/224337

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ramirez JA, Wiemken TL, Peyrani P, Arnold FW, Kelley R, Mattingly WA, et al. Adults Hospitalized with pneumonia in the United States: Incidence, epidemiology, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65(11):1806-12
  2. Gibson GJ, Loddenkemper R, Lundback B, Sibille Y. Respiratory health and disease in Europe: the new European Lung White Book. Eur Respir J 2013;42(3):559-63
  3. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Pneumonia and influenza death rates-United States, 1979-1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44(28):535-7
  4. Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax 2009;64 Suppl 3:iii1-55
  5. Soylar OK, Kilinc O, Ellidokuz H. Comparison of patients with community-acquired pneumonia who did and did not receive treatment in accordance with the 2009 pneumonia guideline of Turkish Thoracic Society. Turk Thorac J 2015;16(2):64-7
  6. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Ölüm Nedeni İstatistikleri, 2018. Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2020. Available from: http://www.tuik. gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30626
  7. Mandell LA. Community-acquired pneumonia: An overview. Postgrad Med 20150;127(6):607-15
  8. File TM. Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 2003;362(9400):1991-2001
  9. Tang CM, Macfarlane JT. Early management of younger adults dying of community acquired pneumonia. Respir Med. 1993;87(4):289-94
  10. Menendez R, Torres A, Aspa J, Capelastegui A, Prat C, Rodriguez de Castro F, et al. [Community acquired pneumonia. New guidelines of the Spanish Society of Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR)]. Arch Bronconeumol 2010;46(10):543-58
  11. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Garau J, Huchon G, Ieven M, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17 Suppl 6:E1-59
  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pneumonia (community-acquired): antimicrobial prescribing NICE guideline. Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2020. Available from: https:// www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng138
  13. Özlü T, Bülbül Y, Alataş F, Arseven O, Coşkun AŞ, Çilli A, et al. Türk Toraks Derneği Erişkinlerde Toplumda Gelişen Pnömoni Tanı Ve Tedavi Uzlaşı Raporu: Update 2009. 10(9). s1-18
  14. Soyletir G, Altinkanat G, Gur D, Altun B, Tunger A, Aydemir S, et al. Results from the Survey of Antibiotic Resistance (SOAR) 2011-13 in Turkey. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i71-i83
  15. Lim WS, Smith DL, Wise MP,