SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 544

Productivity behaviour: To be enthusiastic employee

Verimlilik davranışı: Şevkli işgören olmak

Tunç DEMİRBİLEK
Pages
75–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As result of, companies should give attention the relationship between employee enthusiasm and productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of employee enthusiasm on productivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The organization’s human resources have a great importance to improve productivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As result of, companies should give attention the relationship between employee enthusiasm and productivity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of employee enthusiasm on productivity. The organization’s human resources have a great importance to improve productivity. In this sense, motivation has always been recognized as an important factor in productivity. Employee enthusiasm is a state of high employee morale that derives from satisf- ying the three key needs (fair treatment, achievement and camaraderie) of workers. The enthusiastic employee provides enormous competitive advantages for companies. For this reason, organizations would want to have employees who display that level of enthusiasm for their jobs, their company and their colleagues. As result of, companies should give attention the relationship between employee enthusiasm and productivity.

Özet

Makalenin amacı, verimlilik üzerinde işgören şevkinin etkisini incelemektir. Verimliliğin artırılmasında işletmelerin insan kaynakları büyük bir öneme sahiptir. Bu bağlamda, motivasyonun verimlilik üzerinde önemli bir faktör olduğu her zaman kabul edilmiştir. İşgören şevki, üç anahtar ihtiyacın (adil davranma, başarma ve arkadaşlık) karşılanmasından kaynaklanan işgörenin yüksek moral durumudur. Şevkli işgören, işletmeler açısından büyük rekabet avantajı sağlar. Bu nedenle, örgütler işlerine, işletmesine ve iş arkadaşlarına şevk ile yaklaşan işgörenlere sahip olmayı isterler. Sonuç olarak, işletmeler işgören şevki ve verimlilik arasındaki ilişkiye önem vermelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBİLEK, T. (2010). Productivity behaviour: To be enthusiastic employee. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 544, 75–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/224151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AGUINIS Herman, HENLE Christine A., OSTROFF Cheri (2005); “Measurement in Work and Organizational Psychology”, (Edt.: Neil Anderson, Deniz S. Ones, Handan Kepir Sin- angil ve Chockalingam Viswesvaran), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Personnel Psychology, Sage Publications, London, s. 27-50.
  2. ARNOLD John, SILVESTER Joainne, PATTERSON Fiona, ROBERTSON Ivan, COOPER Cary ve BURNES Bernard (2005); Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace, Fourth Edition,
  3. Pearson Education, Harlow. AYCAN, Zeynep ve KANUNGO, Rabindra N. (2005); “Cross- Cultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Critical Appraisal of the Field and Future Directions”, (Edt.: Neil Anderson, Deniz S. Ones, Handan Kepir Sinangil ve Chockalingam Viswesvaran), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Personnel Psychology, Sage Publications, London, s. 385-408.
  4. BAŞARAN, İbrahim Ethem (1998); Yönetimde İnsan İlişkileri: Yönetsel Davranış, Gül Yayınevi, Ankara, 1998.
  5. BAUMOL, William J. ve McLENNAN, Kenneth (1985); “U.S. Productivity Performance and Its Implications”, (Edt.: William J. Baumol ve Kenneth McLennan), Productivity and U.S. Com- petitiveness, Oxford University Press, Oxford, s. 3-28.
  6. BENTON, Douglas A. (1998); Applied Human Relations: An Organizational and Skill Development Approach, Sixth Edition,
  7. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. BEYNON Huw, GRIMSHAW Damian, RUBERY Jill ve WARD Kevin (2002); Managing Employment Change: The New Realities of Work, Oxford University Press,
  8. Oxford. BIRDI Kamal, CLEGG Chris, PATTERSON Malcolm, ROB- INSON Andrew, STRIDE Chris B., WALL Toby D., WOOD Stephen J. (2008); “The Impact of Human Resource and Operational Management Practices on Company Productivity: A Longitudinal Study, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 61, Issue: 3, s. 467-501.
  9. BLAKE, Robert R. ve MOUTON, Jane Srygley (1981); Productivity: The Human Side-A Social Dynamics Approach, Amacom, New York. BOGETOFT, Peter (1995); “Incentives and Productivity Mea- surements”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 39, Issue: 1-2, s. 67-81.
  10. BURKE, Eugene (2000); “The Economic Impact of the Fit Between the Values of Individuals and Organizational Culture”, British Psychological Society Occupational Psychology Conference, British Psychological Society, Leicester, s. 136-141.
  11. CAPPELLI, Peter (2005); “Will There Really be a Labor Shortgate?”, (Edt.: Michael Losey, Sue Meisinger ve Dave Ulrich), The Future of Human Resource Ma