SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 539

Institutional investors and development of capital markets: Empirical evidence from ISE

Yerli kurumsal yatırımcılar ve sermaye piyasalarının gelişimi: İMKB üzerinde bir uygulama

Serkan Yılmaz KANDIR
Pages
67–77
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the two variables seem to impact each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Institutional investors may be defined as specialized financial institutions that manage savings collectively on behalf of small investors toward specific objectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sample period spans from the first quarter of 1998 to second quarter of 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the two variables seem to impact each other.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Institutional investors may be defined as specialized financial institutions that manage savings collectively on behalf of small investors toward specific objectives. All types of mutual funds, pension funds, closed-end funds, life insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, venture capital investment trusts are referred to as institutional investors. Aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between institutional investors and stock market development in Turkey. Sample period spans from the first quarter of 1998 to second quarter of 2009. Existence and direction of a long-run relationship between the ratio of institutional investors’ security investments to national income and stock market’s development measures are investigated by cointegration and error correction models. Analysis results reveal a long-run relationship between institutional investors and development of ISE. Furthermore, the two variables seem to impact each other.

Özet

Kurumsal yatırımcılar, tasarrufları küçük yatırımcılar adına kolektif biçimde ve belirli hedefler doğrultusunda yöneten uzmanlaşmış finansal kurumlardır. Her çeşit Yatırım Fonları, Bireysel Emeklilik Fonları, Yatırım Ortaklıkları, Hayat Sigorta Şirketleri, Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklıkları ve Girişim Sermayesi Yatırım Ortaklıkları kurumsal yatırımcı olarak nitelendirilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de kurumsal yatırımcılar ile hisse senedi piyasasının gelişmişliği arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılmasıdır. Çalışma, 1998 yılının ilk çeyreğinden 2009 yılının ikinci çeyreğine kadar devam eden dönemi kapsamaktadır. Kurumsal yatırımcıların menkul kıymet yatırımlarının milli gelire oranı ile hisse senedi piyasasının gelişmişlik göstergeleri arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olup olmadığı ve söz konusu ilişkinin yönü eşbütünleşme ve hata düzeltme modeli yardımıyla araştırılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, kurumsal yatırımcılar ile İMKB’nin gelişmişliği arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin olduğunu ortaya koymuş ve ayrıca iki değişkenin birbirini karşılıklı olarak etkilediği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANDIR, S. Y. (2010). Institutional investors and development of capital markets: Empirical evidence from ISE. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 539, 67–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/224109

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. AGARWAL, Prasun; (2007), Institutional Ownership and Stock Liquidity, SSRN Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1029395, 07.03.2008.
  2. ARAS, Güler and Alovsat MÜSLÜMOV; (2005), “Institutional İnvestors and Stock Market Development: A Causality Study”, ISE Review, 29, pp.1-14.
  3. BODIE, Zvi; (1990), “Pension funds and financial innovation” Financial Management, 19(3), pp.11-22.
  4. BOEHMER, Ekkehart and Eric KELLEY; (2007), Institutional İnvestors and the Informational Efficiency of Prices, SSRN Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=791905, 06.03.2008.
  5. BOHL, Martin T., Katrin GOTTSCHALK, Harald HENKE and Rozalia PAL; (2006), Institutional Investors and Stock Market Efficiency: The Case of the January Anomaly, SSRN Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=892144, 10.03.2008.
  6. CATALAN, Mario, Gregorio IMPAVIDO and Alberto R. MUSALEM; (2000), Contractual Savings or Stock Market Development: Which Leads?, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2421, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/ WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2000/10/ 13/000094946_00091205364559/Rendered/PDF/multi_page. pdf, 11.03.2008.
  7. CHAN, Su Han, Wai-Kin LEUNG and Ko WANG; (2004), “The Impact of Institutional Investors on the Monday Seasonal”, Journal of Business, 77(4), pp.967-986.
  8. CHEN, Xia, Jarrad HARFORD and Kai LI; (2007), “Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), pp.279-305.
  9. CVETANOVIC, Slobodan; (2006), “The Role of Institutional Investors in Financial Development of European Union Accession Countries”, Economics and Organization, 3(1), pp.1-11.
  10. DAVIS, E. Philip and Benn STEIL; (2001),
  11. Institutional Investors, First Edition,
  12. MIT Press,
  13. USA. DEMIRGUC-KUNT, Aslı and Ross LEVINE; (1996), “Stock Market Development and Financial Intermediaries: Stylized Facts”, World Bank Economic Review, 10(2), pp.291-321.
  14. DICKEY, David A. and Wayne A. FULLER; (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), pp.427-431.
  15. DICKEY, David A. and Wayne A. FULLER; (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Tİme Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4), pp.1057-1072.
  16. ENDERS, Walter; (1995),
  17. Applied Econometric Time Series, First Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA. ENGLE Robert F. and C.W.J. GRANGER; (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2), pp.251-276.
  18. GRANGER, C. W. J.ve P. NEWBOLD; (1974), “Spurio