Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 539

Emerging markets and original sin problem

Yeni gelişen ülkeler ve orijinal Günah sorunu

Pages
33–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, it will be tried to determine whether debt structure forms fragility source for Turkey in view of public sector domestic debt.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a literature emphasizing that financial crises depend on currency composition and maturity structure of debts in emerging countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Debt structure in terms of short term or foreign currency increases the sensitivity of countries to interest rate and exchange rate changes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, it will be tried to determine whether debt structure forms fragility source for Turkey in view of public sector domestic debt.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been a literature emphasizing that financial crises depend on currency composition and maturity structure of debts in emerging countries. The fact that emerging countries get into debt mainly in short term and foreign currency states that they cannot borrow in terms of domestic currency both from national and international markets (Original Sin Problem). Debt structure in terms of short term or foreign currency increases the sensitivity of countries to interest rate and exchange rate changes. Therefore, emerging markets are vulnerable to financial crises with their debt structure. In this study, it will be tried to determine whether debt structure forms fragility source for Turkey in view of public sector domestic debt.

Özet

Yeni gelişen ülkelerde finansal krizleri borçların parasal bileşimine ve vade yapısına bağlayan bir literatür gelişmiştir. Yeni gelişen ülkelerin ağırlıklı olarak kısa vadeli veya yabancı para cinsinden borçlanmaları, bir yandan borçların para ve vade bileşimini, diğer yandan ulusal ve uluslararası piyasalardan ulusal para birimi cinsinden borçlanamamanın nedenlerini öne çıkarmıştır (Orijinal Günah Sorunu). Kısa vadeli veya yabancı para cinsinden borçlanma yapısına aşırı yönelme, yeni gelişen ülkelerin faiz ve kur değişimlerine olan hassasiyetlerini arttırmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, bu borçlanma yapısı altında yeni gelişen ülkeler finansal krizlere açık hale gelmektedir. Çalışmamızda kamu kesimi iç borç stokunun bileşiminden hareketle borçlanma yapısının Türkiye için bir finansal kırılganlık kaynağı oluşturup oluşturmadığı ortaya konulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADANUR, N. A. (2010). Emerging markets and original sin problem. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 539, 33–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/224108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. ABBAS M Ali and CHRISTENSEN Jakob (2007), “The Role of Domestic Debt Markets in Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation for Low Income Countries and Emerging Markets”, IMF Working Papers, No.07/127. AGHİON P; BACCHETTA P; BANERJEE A (2000), “A Simple Model of Monetary Policy and Currency Crises”, European Economic Review, Vol: 44, No:4-6, pp,728-738. AGHİON P; BACCHETTA P; BANERJEE A (2001), “Currency Crises and Monetary Policy in an Economy with Credit Constraints”, European Economic Review, Vol: 45, No:7, pp,1121- 1150. BOHN Henning (1988), “Why Do We Have Nominal Government Debt?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 21, No.1, pp.127-140. BORENZSTEİN Eduardo; LEVY-YEYATİ E, PANİZZA Ugo (2007), Living With Debt: How to Limit The Risks of Sovereign Finance, Inter-American Development Bank. BORENZSTEİN Eduardo; CHAMON Marcos; OLIVIER Jeanne; MAURO Paulo; ZETTELMEYER Jeromin (2004), Sovereign Debt Structure for Crisis Prevention, IMF Occasional Paper No.237. BORONER Fernando; LORENZONİ Guido: SCHMUKLER Sergio (2004), “Why Do Emerging Markets Borrow Short Term ?” Policy Research Working Paper Series, No.3389, The Worldbank. BURGHOF Ulrich (2004) “Public Debt Management and Glaubwürdigkeit der Geldpolitik: Eine Theotische und empirische Analyse zur Staatlichen Schuldenstruktur Politik”, Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Universitat zu Köln. BURGER J.D; WARNOCK E.E (2003), “Diversification, Original Sin and International Bond Portfolios” International Finance Discussion Papers, No.755, pp. 1-38.
  2. BURNSIDE Craig, EICHENBAUM Martin, REBELO Sergio (2001), “Hedging and Financial Fragility in Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes”, European Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp.1151- 1193. CALVO Guillermo (1988) “Servicing the Public Debt: The Role of Expectations”, American Economic Review, Vol.78, No:4, pp. 647-661.
  3. CALVO Guillermo and GUIDOTTİ Pablo E (1990), “Indexation and Maturity of Government Bonds: An Explaratory Model”, DORNBUSCH Rudiger and DRAGHİ Mario (Ed.), Public Debt Management: Theory and History, Cambridge University Press, pp.52-93. CHAMON Marcus; HAUSMANN Ricardo (2005), “Why Do Countries Borrow the Way They Borrow”, EİCHENGREEN Barry and HAUSMANN Ricardo (Ed.), Other Peoples Money: Debt Denomination and Financial Instability in Emerging Market Economies, The University of Chigago Press, pp. 218-232.
  4. DPT (2001), 2002 Yılı Kamu Finansman Raporu. De HAAN Jakop and SIKKEN Bernd Jan (1995), “On the Relationship Between the Debt Ratio and Debt Maturity”