Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 559

Cost efficiency, technological progresses, economies of scale and scope in commercial Banks: analysis of Turkish Commercial Banking Sector

Ticari Bankalarda maliyet etkinliği, teknolojik ilerlemeler, ölçek ve alan ekonomileri: Türk Ticari Bankacılık Sektörünün analizi

Pages
59–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to our empirical findings, overall the cost efficieny of all banks during this period was high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyse cost efficiency, technological progress, economies of scale and economies of scope for Turkish Banking Sector over the 1997-2010 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study be used as econometrical analysis technics both k-mean cluster to appear the scales and stochastic frontier models to estimate the parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to our empirical findings, overall the cost efficieny of all banks during this period was high.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to analyse cost efficiency, technological progress, economies of scale and economies of scope for Turkish Banking Sector over the 1997-2010 period. In the study be used as econometrical analysis technics both k-mean cluster to appear the scales and stochastic frontier models to estimate the parameters. According to our empirical findings, overall the cost efficieny of all banks during this period was high. Moreover results indicate to exist most powerful economies of scale in sector. Results also indicate that technological progress has not increased during the research period and even there had powerful effects of scope economies in the sector, but these effects were not be dominant.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe 1997-2010 döneminde maliyet etkinliği, teknolojik ilerleme, ölçek ve alan ekonomilerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada ekonometrik analiz yöntemleri olarak ölçekleri belirlemek için k-ortalama tekniği ve katsayı tahminleri için de tesadüfî sınır modelleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre; ele alınan dönemde bankaların genel maliyet etkinliklerinin yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Dahası elde edilen sonuçlar, sektörde çok güçlü ölçek ekonomilerinin varlığına işaret etmektedir. Bulgular, ayrıca teknolojik ilerlemelerin incelenen dönemde arttığını ve sektörde alan ekonomilerinin güçlü etkileri olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARICAN, E., TUNAY, K. B. (2011). Cost efficiency, technological progresses, economies of scale and scope in commercial Banks: analysis of Turkish Commercial Banking Sector. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 559, 59–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/224076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AIGNER, Dennis J. -C. LOVELL, A. KNOX ve Peter SCHMIDT, (1977), "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models", Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
  2. ALLEN, Jason ve Ying LIU. (2005), "Efficiency and Economies of Scale of Large Canadian Banks" Bank of Canada Working Papers, No: wp05-13. ALMANIDIS, Pavlos - Junhui QIAN ve Robin C. SICKLES, (2010), "Bounded Stochastic Frontiers with an Application to the US Banking Industry: 1984-2009", Rice University, (Unpublished Manuscript). (http://economics.rice.edu/WorkArea/ DownloadAsset. aspx?id=-497). ALTUNBAŞ, Y. - E.P.M. GARDENER, P. MOLYNEUX, ve B. MOORE, (2001), "Efficiency in European Banking", European Economic Review, 45(10), 1931-1955.
  3. ALTUNBAŞ, Yener ve Phil MOLYNEUX. (1996), "Economies of Scale and Scope in European Banking", Applied Financial Economics, 6(4), 367-375.
  4. ALTUNBAŞ, Yener ve Philip MOLYNEUX. (1995), "Gümrük Birliğine Giriş Sürecinde Türk Bankacılık Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi", Uzman Gözüyle Bankacılık Dergisi, Sayı 11. (İnan, 2000 içinden). ALVAREZ, Antonio M. - Carlos ARIAS, ve William H. GREENE, (2004), "Accounting for Unobservables in Production Models: Management and Inefficiency", Centro de Estudios Andaluces, Spain, Working Paper No. E2004/72. BALTAGI, Badi H. ve James M. GRIFFIN, (1988), "A General Index of Technical Change", Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 20-41.
  5. BATTESE, G. E. ve T.J. COELLI (1992), "Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Appiicaj tion to Paddy Farmers in India", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1-2), 153-169.
  6. BATTESE, George E. ve Greg S. CORRA, (1977), "Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia", Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21(3), 169-179.
  7. BATTESE, George E. - Tim J. COELLI, ve T.C. COLBY, (1989), "Estimation of Frontier Production Functions and the Efficiencies of Indian Farms Using Panel Data From ICRISAT's Village Level Studies", Journal of Quantitative Economics, 5, 327-348.
  8. BAUMOL, William J - John C. PANZAR, ve Robert D. WILLIG, (1988), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, (Revised Edition). BOS, W.B. Jaap ve James W. KOLARI, (2005), "Large Bank Efficiency in Europe and United States: Are There Economic Motivations for Geographic Expansion in Financial Services?", Journal of Business, 78(4), 1555-1592.
  9. CARVALLO, Oscar ve Adnan KASMAN, (2005), "Co