Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 561

An empirical study: Monthly effects for İstanbul stock exchange banks indices

İstanbul menkul kıymetler borsası'nda bankalar endeksi için ay etkisi üzerine ampirik bir çalışma

Pages
41–55
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And some evidences are presented to the investors for timing decisions of purchase and sales so risk-adjusted returns could be obtained.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efficient Market Hypothesis developed by Fama (1965,1970,1991) claims that stock prices reflect all available information thus any investor operating in the market cannot provide excess returns using some techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, statistically significant returns with a level of 5% confidence observed in months February, August, September and December could not be explained by market efficiency and rational pricing model within the framework determined by the market risk factor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And some evidences are presented to the investors for timing decisions of purchase and sales so risk-adjusted returns could be obtained.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Efficient Market Hypothesis developed by Fama (1965,1970,1991) claims that stock prices reflect all available information thus any investor operating in the market cannot provide excess returns using some techniques. This study investigates the existence of January effect, considered one of the most important anomalies, in return series of Banks Indices (XBANK) in Istanbul Stock Exchange Market (ISE). In the review GARCH models are used that takes into account such empirical observations like non-normal distribution and changing volatility which are often observed in financial return series. As a result of the study, January Effect could not be identified. On the other hand, statistically significant returns with a level of 5% confidence observed in months February, August, September and December could not be explained by market efficiency and rational pricing model within the framework determined by the market risk factor. The results of this study support that the returns are acting systematically during certain time periods. And some evidences are presented to the investors for timing decisions of purchase and sales so risk-adjusted returns could be obtained.

Özet

Fama (1965, 1970, 1991) tarafından geliştirilen "Etkin Piyasalar Hipotezi", menkul kıymet fiyatlarının ilgili menkul kıymetlere ilişkin tüm bilgileri yansıttığını dolayısıyla piyasada işlem yapan hiçbir yatırımcının bir takım teknikler kullanarak normalüstü (ortalamadan fazla) getiri elde edemeyeceğini söyler. Bu çalışma, dönemsel anomalilerden en önemlisi sayılabilecek Ocak ayı etkisinin İMKB Bankalar Endeksi'nde gözlenip gözlenmediğini araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada finansal getiri serilerinde sıklıkla gözlemlenen normal dağılıma aykırılık, volatilitenin zaman içerisinde değişim göstermesi'gibi ampirik gözlemleri de dikkate alan GARCH modelleri kullanılmaktadır. İnceleme sonucunda Ocak ayı etkisi tespit edilememiştir. Diğer taraftan %5 anlamlılık düzeyinde Şubat, Ağustos, Eylül, Ekim ve Aralık aylarında oluşan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı getirilerin, piyasa etkinliği ve rasyonel fiyatlandırma modeli çerçevesinde piyasa risk faktörü tarafından açıklanamadığı belirlenmiştir. Getirilerin yılın belirli aylarına bağlı bir yapıya sahip olduğunu destekleyen bu çalışmanın sonuçları, İMKB'de alım-satım kararlarının zamanlaması ile riske göre düzeltilmiş getiri elde edilebileceği yönünde yatırımcılara kanıtlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜN, M. (2011). An empirical study: Monthly effects for İstanbul stock exchange banks indices. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 561, 41–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/224031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AGGARWAL, Reena and Pietra RIVOLI; (1989), "Seasor and the Day of the Week Effect in Four Emerging Market The Financial Review, 24 (4), pp. 541-550.
  2. AGRAWAL, Anup and Kishore TANDON; (1994), "Anomali or illusions? Evidence from Stock Markets in Eighteen Col tries", Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(1), f. 83-106.
  3. AKAR, Cüneyt; (2006),"Finansal Piyasalarda Krizlerin Takvimsel Faktörlerin Volatilité ve Getiri Üzerine Etkisi", Iktiî İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Cilt 21, Sayı 246 ss.41-53.
  4. AYDOĞAN, Kürşat; (1994), "Hisse Senedi Fiyatlamasın Aykırılıklar", İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 9 (100), ss. 83-89.
  5. BALABAN, Ercan; (1995), "Day of the Week Effects: New E dence From An Emerging Stock Market", Applied Economi Letters, 2 (5), pp.139-143.
  6. BERGES, Angel, John J. MCCONNEL and Gary G. SCHLA BAUM; (1982), "An Investigation of the Turn-of-the-Year Effe the Small Firm Effect, and the Tax-Loss-Selling Pressure h pothesis in Canadian Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, c pp. 185-192.
  7. BİLDİK, Recep; (2000), Hisse Senedi Piyasalarında Döneı sellikler ve İMKB Üzerine Amprik Bir Çalışma, İMKB Yayı, İstanbul.
  8. BRANCH, Ben; (1977 ), "A Tax Loss Trading Rule", Journal Business, 50(2), 198-207.
  9. BROWN, Philip, Allan W. KLEDION and Terry A. MARS (1983), "New Evidence on the Nature of Size-Related Anorr lies in Stock Prices", Journal of Financial Economics, 12 ( pp. 33-56.
  10. CHEN, Chin, Cheng FEW LEE, Andrew M. L. WANG; (200. "A Note On Stock Market Seasonality: The Impact of Sto Price Volatility on the Application of Dummy Variable Regre sion Model", The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finani 42(1), pp.155-162.
  11. COPELAND, Thomas E, TIM KOLLER and Jack MU RIN;(1994), Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value Companies, 2nd Edition, McKinsey & Company, Inc., pp. 3C New York. CORHAY, Albert, Gabriel Alfred HAWAWINI and Pierre l CHEL; (1987), "Seasonality in the Risk-Return Relationsh Some International Evidence", Journal of Finance, 42(1), /: 49-68.
  12. ÇİNKO, Murat; (2008), "İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası Ocak Ayı Etkisi", Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), ss.47-54.
  13. DYL, Edward A.; (1977), "Capital Gain Taxation and Year-E stock Market Behavior", Journal of Finance, 32(1), pp. 165-11
  14. ENGLE, Robert F.; (1982), "Autoregressive Conditional H eroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kir dom Inflation", Econometrica, 50, pp. 987-1008.
  15. ERBİL, A. Fuat; (1993), "Stock Market Seasonality in the tanbul Stock Exchange", Yayımlanmamış Master Tezi, Bitki Üniversitesi,