Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 567

The perception of performance based budget system in the public administrations

Kamu idarelerinde performans esaslı bütçe sisteminin algılanması

Pages
5–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical findings shows that performance based budget system is accurately perceived and implemented within public administrative bodies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Performance based budget system, which takes the issue of budget outcomes as the main concept of allocation of resources, aims the efficiency in the process of resource allocation and usage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 2003, Turkey has adopted performance based budget system based on strategic planning with the enactment of Public Financial Administration and Control Law which is called as a fiscal constitution and implemented in all the public administrative bodies from 2006 onward.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical findings shows that performance based budget system is accurately perceived and implemented within public administrative bodies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Performance based budget system, which takes the issue of budget outcomes as the main concept of allocation of resources, aims the efficiency in the process of resource allocation and usage. In 2003, Turkey has adopted performance based budget system based on strategic planning with the enactment of Public Financial Administration and Control Law which is called as a fiscal constitution and implemented in all the public administrative bodies from 2006 onward. In this study, it is aimed to examine the question of how performance based budgeting is perceived within public administrative bodies with a questionnaire survey in Zonguldak City. Empirical findings shows that performance based budget system is accurately perceived and implemented within public administrative bodies.

Özet

Kaynak tahsisinin sonuçlara dayalı olarak yapıldığı bir bütçeleme anlayışını içeren performans esaslı bütçe sistemi, kamu kesiminde kaynakların tahsis ve kullanımında etkinliğin sağlanmasını amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye'de 2003 yılında kabul edilen ve mali anayasa olarak nitelendirilen 5018 sayılı Kamu Mali Yönetimi ve Kontrol Kanunu ile birlikte stratejik planlamaya dayalı performans esaslı bütçeleme sistemine geçilmiş ve 2006 yılından itibaren tüm kamu idarelerinde uygulanmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışma ile kamu idarelerinde performans esaslı bütçe sisteminin nasıl algılandığı Zonguldak ili kapsamında yapılan bir anket ile araştırılmıştır. Ampirik bulgular, performans esaslı bütçe sisteminin kamu idarelerinde doğru algılandığını ve bu algılamanın da uygulamaya yansıdığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞDİGEN, M., AVCI, M. (2012). The perception of performance based budget system in the public administrations. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 567, 5–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/223976

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AK, Belma; (2010), "Hipotez Testi", Şeref KALAYCI (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, ss. 65-69.
  2. BAĞDİGEN, Muhlis; (2004), "Stratejik Planlamaya Day ah Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme ve Yerel Yönetimler", Hüseyin ÖZGÜR ve Muhammet KÖSECİK (Ed.) Yerel Yönetimler Üzerine Güncel Yazılar II, (Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, ss. 485-522.
  3. CRAİN, W. Mark ve J. Brian O'ROARK; (2004), "The Impact of Performance-Based Budgeting on State Fiscal Performance", Journal of Economics of Governance, 5(2), pp. 167-186.
  4. CURRİSTİNE, Teresa; (2005), "Government Performance: Lessons and Challanges", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(1), pp.127-151.
  5. CURRİSTİNE, Terasa, Zsuzsanna LONTİ ve Isabelle JOU-MARD; (2007), "Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1). DIAMOND, Jack; (2003), "From Program to Performance Budgeting: The Challenge for Emerging Market Economies", IMF Working Paper, WP/03/169. DIAMOND, Jack; (2005), "Establishing a Performance Management Framework for Government", IMF Working Paper, WP/05/50. EGELİ, Haluk, H. Ahmet AKDENİZ, Mehmet AKSARAYLI, Kamil TÜĞEN ve Ahmet ÖZEN; (2007), "Stratejik Planlamaya Dayalı Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Sisteminin Kritik Kontrol Noktaları Analizi: Türkiye'deki Kamu Kurumları Uygulaması", Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), ss. 27-47.
  6. GİLMOUR, B. John ve David E. LEWİS; (2006), "Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget's PART Scores", Public Administration Review, 66(5). Kamu Mali Yönetimi ve Kontrol Kanunu; (2003), T.C. Resmi Gazete, 25326, 24.12.2003.
  7. KİNG, Laura M.; (1995), "Operating and Capital Budget Reform in Minnesota: Managing Public Finances Like The Future Matters", Government Finance Review, 11, pp 7-10. MALİYE BAKANLIĞI; (2004), Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Rehberi Pilot Kurumlar İçin Taslak, Ankara.
  8. MEAGAN, Jordan ve Meri M. HACKBART; (2005), "The Goals and Implementation Success of State Performance-Based Budgeting", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 17(4). OECD; (2007), Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries, USA. ÖZER, M. Akif; (2005), Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Teoriden Uygulamaya, Platin Yayınları,
  9. Ankara.
  10. ROBİNSON, Marc ve Duncan LAST; (2009); "A Basic Model of Performance-Based Budgeting", International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ tnm/2009/tnm0901.pdf, 19.03