SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Local data: A new approach to data in architecture

Faruk Can ÜNAL
Yüksel DEMİR
Pages
13–23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study revisits data with a new approach as local data for use in architecture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Data, information and knowledge terms are often used interchangeably.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The intention of this paper is to provide a better understanding to data, information and knowledge relation with a relative perspective and to explain the usage of the term data in scientific studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study revisits data with a new approach as local data for use in architecture.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Data, information and knowledge terms are often used interchangeably. The intention of this paper is to provide a better understanding to data, information and knowledge relation with a relative perspective and to explain the usage of the term data in scientific studies. In addition to that, it is aimed to develop a classification of data for architecture. When the origin of the data is investigated, it shows natural or cultural references. This relation can be used at fundamental classification of data as natural or cultural. Besides, data is inherently associated with place in architecture. In the determination of the parameters related to the place, architectural studies, site planning studies, and legal regulations in architecture and planning are evaluated to construct a data framework. Local data framework has been developed to classify data that are used in architectural design. For the use of architectural site survey, local data provides a systematic classification in relation to location. The architect can easily access the data associated with the place. This approach supports the architect in design by using the local data. This study revisits data with a new approach as local data for use in architecture.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, F. C., DEMİR, Y. (2020). Local data: A new approach to data in architecture. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 13–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/220163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff ’s Best, From Data to Wisdom. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 170-172.
  2. Aksoy, E. (1975).
  3. Mimarlıkta Tasarım, İletim ve Denetim. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 81-91.
  4. Anderson, J. (2011). Basics architec-ture 03: Architectural design. AVA Publishing SA, 83-99.
  5. Baker, G. H. (2003). Design strategies in architecture: an approach to the anal-ysis of form. Taylor & Francis, 3-13.
  6. Baskarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2013). Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoret-ical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, Volume 18 Number 1, 5-24.
  7. Bayazıt, N. (2004). Endüstriyel tasarımcılar için tasarlama kuramları ve metotları. Birsen Yayınevi, 149-150.
  8. Beer, A., & Higgins, C. (2000). En-vironmental Planning for Site Development: A manual for sustainable local planning and design. Routledge, 1-83.
  9. Bielefeld, B., & El Khouli, S. (2017). Basics Design Ideas. Birkhäuser, 11-38.
  10. Birkeland, J. (2002). Design for Sustainability: A Sourcebook of Ecological Design Solutions. Earthscan, London, 52-73.
  11. Boyacıoğlu, C., Pulat Gökmen, G., & Ayıran, N. (2017). Anthropocene idea in modern avant-garde architecture: a retrospective discussion on Wright and Fuller. A | Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14(2), 105-117.
  12. Brooks, R. G. (1988). Site Planning: Environment, Process, and Develop-ment. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 37-54.
  13. Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public Places - Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Architectural Press, 77-266.
  14. Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., Laramee, R., Ribarsky, W., Scheuer-mann, G., & Silver, D. (2009).
  15. Data, Information and Knowledge in Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 29(1), 12-19.
  16. Childe, G. (2010). Kendini yaratan insan. Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul, 79-103.
  17. Crouch, D. P., & Johnson, J. G. (2001). Traditions in Architecture: Afri-ca, America, Asia, and Oceania. Oxford University Press, New York, 1-4.
  18. Demir, Y. (2000). An Architecture Information Management System (IMS) for Consideration of Multi-Dimensionality within Wholeness (Un-published doctoral dissertation). İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, 7-8.
  19. Demir, Y. (2016). Multidimensionality and Unity as Part of Architecture & Nature & Culture Relations. Surviving between Pedagogy and Practice in Architectural Design, İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 33-46.
  20. Eco, U. (1998). Faith in Fakes: Travels in