Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Determining the Training Needs of Teachers in Ethical Use of Information Technologies

Pages
476–497
Publication Date
2021-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, 22.8% of teachers need ethical training in the Stalking sub-dimension, 14.5% in the Communication sub-dimension, and 9.4% in the Confidence and Material sub-dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the training needs of teachers regarding the ethical use of information technologies were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The training needs levels of teachers and the significant differentiations of training needs according to gender, teaching level, professional seniority, branch, and education levels were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, 22.8% of teachers need ethical training in the Stalking sub-dimension, 14.5% in the Communication sub-dimension, and 9.4% in the Confidence and Material sub-dimension.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ethic · Information Technologies (IT) · Teacher

Abstract

In this study, the training needs of teachers regarding the ethical use of information technologies were examined. The training needs levels of teachers and the significant differentiations of training needs according to gender, teaching level, professional seniority, branch, and education levels were investigated. In this study, the discrepancy view approach and normative need type were used. The data were collected via “the Scale of Ethical Use of Information Technologies in Education” developed by Baysan and Çetin (2019). The survey method was applied. The research was carried out with 745 teachers working in public schools in the city center of Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. The sample group was determined by stratification method and simple random sampling method. Schools were stratified as primary school, secondary school, divinity secondary school and high school. A certain number of schools from each stratum were determined by lot, and it was aimed to reach all teachers in the specified schools. More than half of the participants were female with a rate of 55.5%. Data were collected from teachers working in five different main branches. According to the results, 22.8% of teachers need ethical training in the Stalking sub-dimension, 14.5% in the Communication sub-dimension, and 9.4% in the Confidence and Material sub-dimension. In Privacy and Accessibility sub-dimensions, nearly 1% of teachers need ethical training. Regarding the ethical use of information technologies, there were significant differences in some sub-dimensions according to some independent variables. Results show that teachers need less ethical training than expected.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSAN, E., ÇETİN, Ş. (2021). Determining the Training Needs of Teachers in Ethical Use of Information Technologies. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 476–497. https://ajindex.com/articles/220125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adam, A., & Ofori-Amanfo, J. (2000). Does gender matter in computer ethics?. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 37–47.
  2. Afyon MEM. (2019). Afyonkarahisar İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü. https://afyon.meb.gov.tr/ sayfasından erişilmiştir. Akçadağ, T. (2010). Öğretmenlerin ilköğretim programındaki yöntem teknik ölçme ve değerlendirme konularına ilişkin eğitim ihtiyaçları. Bilig, (53), 29-50.
  3. Akcay, B. (2008). The relationship between technology and ethics; from society to schools. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Tojde, 9(4), 120-127.
  4. Baysan, E., & Çeti̇n, Ş. (2019). Eğitimde Bilişim Teknolojilerinin Etik Kullanımı Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi Çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 394-417.
  5. Buckinghan, W. (2012). Felsefe kitabı. (E. Lakşe, Çev.). İstanbul:
  6. Alfa Kitap. Burton, J. K., & Merrill, P. F. (1991). Needs assessment: Goals, needs, and priorities. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson & M. H. Tillman (Ed.), Instructional Design Principles and Applications (pp.17-44). New Jersey: ETP. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Calluzzo, V. J., & Cante, C. J. (2004). Ethics in information technology and software use. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 301-312.
  9. Can, A. (2016). SPSS ile nicel veri analizi. [Quantitative data analysis with spss]. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi. Çelen, F. K., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımı ve etik olmayan davranışlar: sorunlar, araştırmalar ve değerlendirmeler. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(8), 124-153.
  11. Çetin. Ş. (1997). Ankara ili merkez ilçelerindeki halk eğitim merkezlerinde görevli eğitici personelin (öğretmenlerin) yetişkin eğitimcisi olarak eğitim ihtiyaçlarının saptanması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  12. Cevizci, A. (2012). Etiğe giriş. İstanbul:
  13. Paradigma Yayınları.
  14. Çiftçi, E. (2009). İşitme engelli öğrenciler için hazırlanan bilgisayar destekli yazılı anlatım becerisi geliştirme materyalinin tasarımı, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. Çörez, A. B. (2016). Öğretim teknolojileri ve etik. K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş. (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojilerinin temelleri teoriler, araştırmalar, eğilimler içinde (s. 437-453). Ankara:
  15. Pegem Akademi. Creswell, J. W. (2017). A