Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Knotless scleral fixation intraocular lens implantation results

Düğümsüz skleral fiksasyonlu göz içi lensi implantasyonu sonuçları

Pages
172–176
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Complications of Z-suture scleral fixation IOL implantation technique are minimal and it can be performed in short duration, easily and safely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the results of knotless Z-suture scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) implantation technique to ciliary sulcus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Best corrected visual acuity at postoperative 2. month was significantly higher compared to the best corrected visual acuity at preoperative period (p=0.037).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Complications of Z-suture scleral fixation IOL implantation technique are minimal and it can be performed in short duration, easily and safely.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dikiş teknikleri · Göz içi basınç · İntraoperatif komplikasyonlar

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the results of knotless Z-suture scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) implantation technique to ciliary sulcus. Materials and Methods: Twenty subjects whom Z- suture scleral fixation IOL implantation was performed, were included in the study. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: Best corrected visual acuity at postoperative 2. month was significantly higher compared to the best corrected visual acuity at preoperative period (p=0.037). Best corrected visual acuity remained the same at 6 subjects and increased at 14 subjects and except 1 case all subjects achieved a visual acuity of logMAR 0.3 or better. Only in 1 subject, hyphema was seen during operation. At the postoperative period, suture exposure was seen at 1 subject at 1. month and 2 subjects developed secondary open angle glaucoma which was controlled by medical treatment. No intraocular lens dislocation or tilt was seen. Conclusion: Complications of Z-suture scleral fixation IOL implantation technique are minimal and it can be performed in short duration, easily and safely.

Özet

Amaç: Düğümsüz Z-sütür yöntemi ile siliyer sulkusa skleral fiksasyonlu göz içi lensi (GİL) implantasyonu cerrahisinin sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Z-sütür yöntemi ile skleral fiksasyonlu GİL yerleştirilen 20 olgu retrospektif olarak dahil edildi. Olguların düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinlikleri, göz içi basınçları, ameliyat esnasında ve sonrasında gelişen komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Bulgular: Ameliyat sonrası 2. ayda düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliği, ameliyat öncesinde ölçülen düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliğine göre anlamlı şekilde artış gösterdi (p=0.037). Düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliği 6 hastada sabit kalırken 14 olguda artış gösterdi, 1 olgu hariç tüm olgular 0.3 logMAR veya daha iyi seviyede görme keskinliğine ulaştı. Ameliyat esnasında sadece 1 olguda hifema görüldü. Ameliyat sonrası dönemde ise 1 olguda 1. ay sütür ekspojur oldu, 2 hastada sekonder açık açılı glokom gelişti ve medikal tedavi ile kontrol altına alındı. Olgularda göz içi lenslerinde dislokasyon veya tilt saptanmadı. Sonuç: Z-sütür yöntemi ile skleral fiksasyonlu GİL implantasyonu yönteminin komplikasyonları düşük olup kısa sürede, kolay ve güvenle uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVAŞ, G. F., KÜSBECİ, T., YİĞİT, S., ERMİŞ, S. S., İNAN, Ü. Ü. (2012). Knotless scleral fixation intraocular lens implantation results. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 172–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/219623

References (17)

  1. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull WHO 1995;73:116-21
  2. Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, et al. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in Northern India. Cornea 2005;24:989-91
  3. Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwanfrom 1987 to 1999. Cornea 2001;20:141-4
  4. Sugar A, Sugar J. Techniques in penetrating keratoplasty. A quarter century of development. Cornea 2000;9:603-10
  5. Cosar CB, Sridhar MS, Cohen EJ, et al. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996-2000. Cornea 2002;21:148-51
  6. Dobbins KRB, Price FW, Whitsom WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 2000;19:813-6
  7. Poinard C, Tuppin P, Loty B, et al. The French national waiting list for keratoplasty created in 1999: patient registration, indications, characteristics, andturnover. J Fr Ophtalmol 2003;26:911-9
  8. Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, et al. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1396-402
  9. Chaidaroon W, Ausayakhun S, Ngamtiphakorn S, et al. Clinical indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, 1996-1999. Med Assoc Thai 2003;86:206-11
  10. Edwards M, Clover GM, Brookes N, et al. Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-1999. Cornea 2002;21:152-5
  11. Legeais JM, Parc C, d’Hermies F, et al. Nineteen years of penetrating keratoplasty in the Hotel-DieuHospital in Paris. Cornea 2001;20:603-6
  12. Mkanganwi N, Nondo SI, Guramatunhu S. Indications for corneal grafting in Zimbabwe. CentAfr J Med 2000;46:300-2 13. Siganos CS, Tsiklis NS, Miltsakakis DG, et al. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Greece, 1982-2006: a multicenter study. Cornea 2010;29:372-4
  13. Li JY, Mannis MJ. Eye banking and the changing trends in contemporary corneal surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010;50:101-2
  14. Ting DS, Sau CY, Srinivasan S, et al. Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:405-8
  15. Wang JY, Xie LX, Song XS, et al. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Shandong, 2005-2010. Int J Ophthalmol 2011;4:492-7
  16. Ghosheh FR, Cremona FA, Rapuano CJ, et al. Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980-2005. Int Ophthalmol 2008;28:147-53
  17. Keenan TD, Carley F, Yeates D, et al. Trends in corneal graft surgery in the UK. Br J Op