Journals / Colloquium Anatolicum / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 19

Ein neuer Skyphos des Kalymnos-Malers

Pages
121–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although he was not among the most talented artists of his time, one may appreciate his confident hands judging from his lines and imagine that he, like his counterparts producing similar decorations, was working under time constraints due to mass production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A study on the imported vases kept at the Burdur Archaeological Museum has revealed that among them a Attic red figure skyphos was actually the work of the Kalymnos Painter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The painter’s known works suggest that he was active in the second quarter of the 4th century bc.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although he was not among the most talented artists of his time, one may appreciate his confident hands judging from his lines and imagine that he, like his counterparts producing similar decorations, was working under time constraints due to mass production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

A study on the imported vases kept at the Burdur Archaeological Museum has revealed that among them a Attic red figure skyphos was actually the work of the Kalymnos Painter. Like his other vases, this skyphos too bears two youths wearing himations on its either faces. It appears that the thick border of upturned “V ”s below the himations glazed with firnis and stylization of the voluted floral motifs on both sides of the scenes are the characteristics of the Kalymnos Painter. The painter’s known works suggest that he was active in the second quarter of the 4th century bc. He specialized in Type A skyphos decoration and worked with a very narrow range of scenes. Like the painters of the F.B. Group, to whom he was stylistically related, he must have worked in a workshop which met the demands of the market of cheaper vases across the Mediterranean. Although he was not among the most talented artists of his time, one may appreciate his confident hands judging from his lines and imagine that he, like his counterparts producing similar decorations, was working under time constraints due to mass production.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAŞKA, M. (2020). Ein neuer Skyphos des Kalymnos-Malers. Colloquium Anatolicum, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 19, 121–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/219388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Amm. Ammianus Marcellinus, Roma Tarihi, Çev. S. Özgüler, İstanbul, 2019.
  2. Ann. Anna Komnene, The Alexiad, Çev. E. R. A. Sewter, Londra, 1969.
  3. Arık, R. O. 1940 “1936’da Yapılan Hafriyatlar, Alpullu (Trakya) Hafriyatı”, Türk Tarih Arkeologya ve Etnografya Dergisi 4: 242-243.
  4. Aybek, S. 2007 “Thrak Atlısı Figürünün İkonografik Yapısı İçinde Edirne Arkeoloji Müzesi’ndeki Steller ve Heykellerin Konumu”, M. Kadıoğlu - Ö. Erhan (eds.), Coşkun Özgünel’e 65. Yaş Armağanı, İstanbul: 61-72.
  5. Baykan, C. - D. Baykan, 2012 Eskiçağ’da Cam, İstanbul.
  6. Baş, D. 2019 Edirne Arkeoloji Müzesi Metal Buluntuları, Trakya Üniversitesi,
  7. Sosyal Bilimsel Enstitüsü, Arkeoloji Ana Bilim Dalı (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Edirne. Bon, A. M. - A. Bon, 1957
  8. Les Timbres Amphoriques de Thasos, Paris. Boucher, S. 1970
  9. Bronzes Grecs, Hellénistiques, Et Étrusques (Sades, Ibériques, et Celtiques) des Musées de Lyon, Lyon. Canoğlu, E. 2011 Amphora Mühürlerinden Hareketle Klasik ve Hellenistik Dönemlerde Thasos ve Doğu Akdeniz Ticari İlişkileri, Ege Üniversitesi,
  10. Sosyal Bilimsel Enstitüsü, Klasik Arkeoloji Ana Bilim Dalı (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), İzmir.
  11. Cassuto, D. 2016 “Textile Production Implements”, Gamla III: The Shmarya Gutmann Excavations 1976–1989
  12. Finds and Studies, Part 2, Kudüs. 261-282
  13. Chavane, M. J. 1975 Salamine de Chypre. VI. Les Petits Objets, Paris. Çetin, N. - V. Kaya, 2010 “Boyalık Nekropolü 2008 Yılı Kazı Çalışmaları”, MKKS 18: 79-90.
  14. Çokay Kepçe, S. 2017 Perge Batı Nekropolis Mezar Buluntuları, 1997-2007 Yılları Arasında 169 Numaralı Parselde Yürütülen Çalışmalar, İstanbul.
  15. Davidson, G. Y. 1952
  16. Corinth, Volume XII, The Minor Objects, Princeton/New Jersey. Dündar, E. 2006 Hellenistik ve Roma Dönemleri Patara Unguentariumları, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi,
  17. Sosyal Bilimsel Enstitüsü, Arkeoloji Ana Bilim Dalı (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Aydın. Empereur, J.Y. - Y. Garlan (eds.) 1986
  18. Recherches sur les Amphores Grecques, BHC Supplément XIII, Paris. Erdoğu, B. 1997 “Edirne İli 1995 Yılı Yüzey Araştırması”, AST 14/1: 273-291. 2002 Neolithic and Chalcolithic Cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham Üniversitesi, Arkeoloji Bölümü (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Durham. Ertuğrul, Ö. 2014 “Havsa/Nikopolis/Hasköy”, Vakıf Restorasyon Yıllığı 8: 79-94.
  19. Evliya Çelebi Evliya Çelebi, Günümüz Türkçesiyle Evliyâ Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi, 3. Cilt, 2. Kitap, Haz., Y. Dağlı – S. A. Kahraman, İstanbul, 2006.
  20. Haggis, D., C. - M. S. Mook - R. D. Fitzsimons - C. M. Scarry - L. M. Snyder, 2007 “Ex