SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

The Relatıonshıp Of Sustaınable Educatıon Polıcıes Wıth Economıc Growth: The Case Of Sıngapore

Sürdürülebilir Eğitim Politikaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Singapur Örneği

Rabia ERSOY
Pages
55–72
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The action-reaction analysis results similarly indicate that the economic growth variable does not react to any deviation in gross registry rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effect of Singapore’s successful education policies on economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of primary, secondary, and higher-education registry rates in Singapore on economic growth was analyzed using yearly data from 1970 to 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The action-reaction analysis results similarly indicate that the economic growth variable does not react to any deviation in gross registry rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eğitim Politikaları · Ekonomik Büyüme · Sürdürülebilirlik

Abstract

This study examines the effect of Singapore’s successful education policies on economic growth. The effect of primary, secondary, and higher-education registry rates in Singapore on economic growth was analyzed using yearly data from 1970 to 2017. The relationship between education policies and economic growth was examined using the Granger causality test and VAR analysis. Contrary to endogenous growth theories, the results obtained from the VAR Granger causality/block exogeneity Wald tests indicate that schooling rates in Singapore do not affect economic growth. The action-reaction analysis results similarly indicate that the economic growth variable does not react to any deviation in gross registry rates.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Singapur’un başarılı eğitim politikalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. 1970-2017 dönemini kapsayan yıllık veri seti üzerinden Singapur’daki ilk, orta ve yükseköğretim kayıt oranlarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi analiz edilmiştir. Eğitim politikaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi, Granger nedensellik testi ve VAR analizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. VAR Granger nedensellik/blok dışsallık Wald testlerinden elde edilen sonuçlar, içsel büyüme teorilerinin aksine, Singapur’un okullaşma oranlarının ekonomik büyüme üzerinde etkili olmadığına işaret etmektedir. Etki-tepki analiz sonuçları da benzer şekilde, brüt kayıt oranlarında meydana gelecek bir sapmaya ekonomik büyüme değişkeninin tepki vermediğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, R. (2020). The Relatıonshıp Of Sustaınable Educatıon Polıcıes Wıth Economıc Growth: The Case Of Sıngapore. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 55–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/218911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Asteriou, D., Agiomirgianakis, G. M. (2001). Human Capital and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Greece. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(5), s.481-489.
  2. Barro, R. J. (2013). Education and Economic Growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14(2), s.301-328.
  3. Becherair, A. (2014). Education and Economic Growth in Algeria: An Empirical Investigation by Using ARDL Approach. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 7(3), s.1215-1224.
  4. Çayak, S. “Uluslararası Öğrencileri Değerlendirme Programı-PISA”, içinde: Ayşen Bakioğlu, (Ed), Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim. İstanbul: Eğitim Yayınevi, 2017, s.101-129.
  5. Çil, N. (2014). Finansal Ekonometri. İstanbul:
  6. Der Yayınevi.
  7. Denison, E.F. (1963). The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us. The Journal of Economic History, 23(3), s.119-136.
  8. Department of Statistics Singapore. (2018). Trade and Investment. 20, 05, 2019 tarihinde Department of Statistics Singapore: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/economy/national-accounts/latest-data adresinden alındı. Gopinathan, S. (1974). Towards A National System of Education in Singapore, 1945-1973. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  9. Gujarati, D. N. (2003).
  10. Basic Econometrics. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill Education. Harbinson, F. and Myers, C. A. (1964).
  11. Education, Manpower and Economic Growth: Strategies of Human Resource Development. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill Education. Hicks, N. (1980). Economic Growth and Human Capital. World Bank Staff Working Papers, No: 408, s.1-37.
  12. Hogan, D. (2014). Why is Singapore’s School System so Successful, and is It a Model Fort He West? https://theconversation.com/why-is-singapores-school-system-so-successful- and-is-it-a-model-for-the-west-22917, [İndirme Tarihi: 3.7.2020]
  13. Keller, K. R. I. (2006).
  14. Investment in Primary, Secondary and Higher Education and the Effects on Economic Growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(1), s.18-34. doi: 10.1093/cep/byj012 Leipziger, D. M. (1993). Lessons from East Asia. Washington D.C.: World Bank. Lin, T. C. (2004). The Role of Higher Education in Economic Eevelopment: An Empirical Study of Taiwan Case. Journal of Asian Economics, 15(2), s.355–371.
  15. Maitra, B., Mukhopadhyay, C.K. (2012). Public Spending on Education and Health-care in the Selected Courtiers of Asia and the Pacific. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 19(2), s.19-48.
  16. Maitra, B. (2016). Investment in Human Capital and Economic Growth in Singapore. Global Business Review, 17(2), s.1