Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Molecular Markers in Plant Biotechnology

Bitki Biyoteknolojisinde Moleküler Markörler

Pages
207–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, general principles, advantages-disadvantages and application areas of molecular marker technologies used in biotechnology are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:At present, biotechnology is one of scientific fields that is the most popular and open to latest advances.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Plant biotechnology is one of these fields and molecular marker technologies used in this area appears to be an important biotechnological tool.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, general principles, advantages-disadvantages and application areas of molecular marker technologies used in biotechnology are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyoteknoloji · bitki biyoteknolojisi · moleküler markör

Abstract

At present, biotechnology is one of scientific fields that is the most popular and open to latest advances. Plant biotechnology is one of these fields and molecular marker technologies used in this area appears to be an important biotechnological tool. With molecular marker, any gene in the genome or gene region related with any piece of DNA is represented. After the discovery of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a large number of molecular marker techniques which are commonly used have been developed such as Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR), Sequence-Related Ampli?ed Polymorphism (SRAP), Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) and Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR). These marker technologies are used effectively in many fields such as physical mapping, gene discovery and tagging, phylogenetic studies, evolutionary genetic and genetic diversity studies. As a result, molecular markers have brought expansive dimensions in plant biotechnology studies, enabling to get more efficient and rapid scientific results. In this study, general principles, advantages-disadvantages and application areas of molecular marker technologies used in biotechnology are discussed.

Özet

Biyoteknoloji, günümüzde en popüler ve yeniliklere açık bilimsel alanların başında gelmektedir. Bitki biyoteknolojisi de bu alanlardan biridir ve bu alanda kullanılan moleküler markör teknolojileri çok önemli bir biyoteknolojik araç olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Moleküler markör ile genomda herhangi bir gen bölgesi ya da gen bölgesi ile ilgili DNA parçası temsil edilmektedir. Polimer Zincir Reaksiyonunun (PCR) keşfinden sonra Çoğaltılmış Parça Uzunluk Polimorfizm (AFLP), Basit Dizi Tekrarları (SSR), Dizi İlişkili Çoğaltılmış Polimorfizm (SRAP), Tek Nükleotid Polimorfizmi (SNP) ve Basit Tekrarlı Diziler Arası Polimorfizm (ISSR) gibi yaygın olarak kullanılan çok sayıda moleküler markör teknikleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu markör teknolojileri fiziksel haritalama, gen keşfi ve etiketleme, filogenetik çalışmalar, evrimsel genetik ve genetik çeşitlilik çalışmaları gibi pek çok alanda etkin şekilde kullanılmaktadırlar. Sonuç olarak, moleküler markörler bitki biyoteknolojisi çalışmalarına çok önemli boyutlar kazandırmış, daha etkili ve hızlı bilimsel sonuçların alınmasına imkân sağlamıştır. Bu çalışmada, bitki biyoteknolojisinde kullanılan moleküler markör teknolojilerinin genel prensipleri, avantajları-dezavantajları ve uygulama alanlarından bahsedilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, E., KOÇ, İ. (2011). Molecular Markers in Plant Biotechnology. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 207–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/218341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agarwal, M., N. Shrivastava ve H. Padh, 2008.Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep, 27, 617–631.
  2. Althoff, D.M., M.A. Gitzendanner, K.A. Segraves, 2007. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst Biol, 56, 477–484.
  3. Budak, H., R.C. Shearman, I. Parmaksiz, R.E. Gaussoin, T.P. Riordan, I. Dweikat, 2004. Molecular characterization of Buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. Theor Appl Genet, 108, 328–334.
  4. Caetano-Anolles, G., B.J. Bassam, P.M. Gresshoff, 1991.DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Biotechnol, 9, 553–557.
  5. Ching, A.D.A., Caldwell K.S., Jung M. ve ark.,, 2002. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines.BMC Genet, 3, 19. Davis, G.L., M.D. Mcmullen, C. Baysdorfer, T. Musket, D. Grant ve ark.,, 1999. A maize map standard with sequenced core markers, grass genome reference points, and 932 expressed sequence tagged sites (ESTs) in a 1736 locus map. Genetics, 152, 1137– 1172. Desplanque, B., P. Boudry, K. Broomberg, P. SaumitouLaprade, J. Cuguen, H. Dijk, 1999. Genetic diversity and gene flow between wild, cultivated and weedy forms of Beta vulgaris L. (Chenopodiaceae), assessed by RFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet.,98, 1194–1201.
  6. Filiz, E., B.S. Ozdemir, M. Tuna, H. Budak, 2009. Diploid Brachypodium distachyon of Turkey: Molecular and Morphological analysis, Molecular Breeding of Forage and Turf, ed: Yamada T. and Spangenberg G., Springer Science, Pp: 83. Freudenreich, C.H., J.B Stavenhagen., V.A. Zakian, 1997. Stability of a CTG:CAG trinucleotide repeat in yeast is dependent on its orientation in the genome. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 2090–2098.
  7. Gupta, M, Y.S. Chyi, J. Romero-Severson, J.L. Owen, 1994. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple sequence repeats. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89, 998-1006.
  8. Hu, J. ve B.A Vick, 2003. Target region amplification polymorphism: a novel marker technique for plant genotyping. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 21, 289–294.
  9. Hu, J., O.E Ochoa, M.J. Truco, B.A. Vick, 2005. Application of the TRAP technique to lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) genotyping. Euphytica, 144, 225–235.
  10. Jeffreys, A.J., V. Wilson, S.L. Thein, 1985. Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature, 314, 67-73.
  11. Jones, N., H. O