Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

AGGREGATE LIQUIDITY CREATION OF ISLAMIC BANKS IN TURKEY

Pages
197–212
Publication Date
2021-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite the continuous upward trend in aggregate liquidity created by Turkish Islamic banks, their loan-to-asset and deposit-to-asset ratios have been declining in our sample period, which suggests that the observed trend has been driven by extensive margin (i.e., bank sizes growing in real terms) rather than the intensive margin (banks creating liquidity more effectively).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper provides a detailed analysis of aggregate liquidity created by Islamic (participation) banks in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using quarterly regulatory dataset for the period of 2010–2017 and applying Berger and Bouwman framework to measure liquidity creation, we document that the liquidity created by Turkish Islamic (participation) banks has tripled (in inflation adjusted terms) in our sample period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite the continuous upward trend in aggregate liquidity created by Turkish Islamic banks, their loan-to-asset and deposit-to-asset ratios have been declining in our sample period, which suggests that the observed trend has been driven by extensive margin (i.e., bank sizes growing in real terms) rather than the intensive margin (banks creating liquidity more effectively).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010–2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Islamic Banks · Liquidity Creation · Turkey

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed analysis of aggregate liquidity created by Islamic (participation) banks in Turkey. Using quarterly regulatory dataset for the period of 2010–2017 and applying Berger and Bouwman framework to measure liquidity creation, we document that the liquidity created by Turkish Islamic (participation) banks has tripled (in inflation adjusted terms) in our sample period. Furthermore, we find that Islamic banks have created liquidity both on and off their balance sheets. Finally, we observe that Turkish Islamic banks have been creating more liquidity with their liabilities than their assets. Despite the continuous upward trend in aggregate liquidity created by Turkish Islamic banks, their loan-to-asset and deposit-to-asset ratios have been declining in our sample period, which suggests that the observed trend has been driven by extensive margin (i.e., bank sizes growing in real terms) rather than the intensive margin (banks creating liquidity more effectively).

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, O., OZSOY, S. M. (2021). AGGREGATE LIQUIDITY CREATION OF ISLAMIC BANKS IN TURKEY. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 197–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/217903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ABDELSALAM, O., El-Komi, M. (2016). Islamic Finance: Introduction and Implications for Future Research and Practice, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132: 1-3.
  2. ABEDIFAR, P., Hasan, I., Tarazi, A. (2016). Finance-Growth Nexus and Dual-Banking Systems: Relative Importance of Islamic Banks, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132: 198-215.
  3. ACHARYA, V. V., Richardson, M. (2009).
  4. Causes of The Financial Crisis, Critical Review, 21(2-3): 195-210.
  5. AKALA, İ. (2018). Comparing Financial Performances of Conventional and Participation Banks: Case of Turkey (2005–2015), International Journal of Inspiration and Resilience Economy, 2(1): 11-17.
  6. AKIN, O., Ozsoy, M. (2019). Global Trends in Liquidity Creation: The Role of the Off – Balance Sheet, New Trends in Banking and Finance: 77-94,
  7. Peter Lang, Berlin. AKIN, O., Ozsoy, M. (2020). Political Liquidity Creation: Electoral Cycles and State-Owned Banks, Working Paper. AKIN, O., Ozsoy, M. (2021). Bank Liquidity Creation in Turkey: Conventional vs. Islamic Banks, Working Paper. AKINCI, D. A., Matousek, R., Radić, N., Stewart, C. (2013). Monetary policy and The Banking Sector in Turkey, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 27: 269-285.
  8. ALPER, K., Hulagu, T., Keles, G. (2012). An Empirical Study on Liquidity and Bank Lending, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper, 4. ALTAN, M., Parlakkaya, R. (2004). Bilanço Dışı İşlemlerin Banka Performansına Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Örneği, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 19(219): 107-122.
  9. ALTUNBAS, Y., Gambacorta, L., Marques-Ibanez, D. (2009). Securitisation and the Bank Lending Channel, European Economic Review, 53(8): 996-1009.
  10. ANBAR, A., Alper, D. (2011). Bankaların Türev Ürün Kullanım Yoğunluğunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 50: 77-94.
  11. AYSAN, A. F., Disli, M., Ng, A., Ozturk, H. (2016). Is Small the New Big? Islamic Banking for SMEs in Turkey, Economic Modelling, 54: 187-194.
  12. AYSAN, A. F., Dolgun, M. H., Turhan, M. I. (2013). Assessment of the Participation Banks and Their Role in Financial Inclusion in Turkey, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(sup5): 99-111.
  13. BARRELL, R., Davis, E. P. (2008). The Evolution of the Financial Crisis of 2007—8, National Institute Economic Review, 206(1): 5-14.
  14. BECK, T., R. Dottling, T. Lambert, and M. van Dijk (2020).
  15. Liquidity Creation, Investment, and Growth, CEPR Discussion Papers no 14956, Centre for Economic Policy Research. BERGER, A.