Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Psychiatric Evaluation of Organ Donor Candidates in a University Hospital and Their Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life Levels

Bir üniversite hastanesine başvuran organ nakli verici adaylarının psikiyatrik değerlendirmeleri, anksiyete, depresyon ve yaşam kalitesi düzeyleri

Pages
48–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is of crucial importance to evaluate the psychosocial states of donors, in addition to recipients, in order to manage the long-lasting transplant process, a treatment- and care- demanding one in a more appropriate way

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychiatric evaluation of organ donor candidates in a university hospital and their anxiety, depression and quality of life levelsObjective: The aim of this study was to conduct a psychiatric evaluation of organ donor candidates and to investigate their levels of anxiety, depression and quality of life.Material and Methods: This study was performed between May 2015 and February 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It included 102 volunteers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is of crucial importance to evaluate the psychosocial states of donors, in addition to recipients, in order to manage the long-lasting transplant process, a treatment- and care- demanding one in a more appropriate way
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Psychiatric evaluation of organ donor candidates in a university hospital and their anxiety, depression and quality of life levelsObjective: The aim of this study was to conduct a psychiatric evaluation of organ donor candidates and to investigate their levels of anxiety, depression and quality of life.Material and Methods: This study was performed between May 2015 and February 2016. It included 102 volunteers. The socio-demographic Data Collection Form, DSM-IV Clinical Interview Form – Clinical Version Structured for Axis Diagnoses (SCID-I/CV), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R), and SF-36 Quality of Life Survey (SF-36) were administered to the patients. Results: The average age of the applicants was found to be 41.64±12.02, 42.2% (n=43) being male and 57.8% (n=59) being female. When it comes to the degree of affinity between potential donors and recipients, 57.8% (n=59) were first-degree relatives, 19.6% (n=20) were spouses, and 22.5% (n=23) were other relatives and/or close relations. By dividing donor candidates into groups by the degree of their affinity to recipients, there were statistically significant differences revealed between BDI, BAI and SCL-90-R total scores and interpersonal sensitivity subscale scores. Conclusion: As compared to the global average, the number of living donors is higher than cadaver donors; and donor candidates mostly comprise spouses and first-degree relatives. Therefore, family members and first-degree relatives who are affected directly or indirectly by the transplant process are exposed to social and psychological effects more as the donor candidates/donors. It is of crucial importance to evaluate the psychosocial states of donors, in addition to recipients, in order to manage the long-lasting transplant process, a treatment- and care- demanding one in a more appropriate way

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda organ nakli verici adaylarının psikiyatrik değerlendirmeleri, anksiyete, depresyon ve yaşam kalitesi düzeyleri araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Araştırma Mayıs 2015-Şubat 2016 tarihleri arasında yürütülmüştür. Toplam 102 gönüllü çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastalara Sosyodemografik veri formu, DSM-IV Eksen Tanıları İçin Yapılandırılmış Klinik Görüşme Ölçeği-Klinik Versiyonu(SCID-I/CV) ölçeği, Beck Anksiyete Ölçeği (BAÖ), Beck Depresyon Ölçeği (BDÖ), Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R), SF-36 Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği (SF-36) uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Başvuranların yaş ortalaması 41.64±12.02 olup, %42.2'si (n=43) erkek, %57.8'i (n=59) kadındı. Verici adaylarının alıcılara olan yakınlık dereceleri; %57.8'i (n=59) 1. derece akraba, %19.6'sı (n=20) eş, %22.5'i (n=23) diğer akraba ve tanıdık idi. Yakınlık derecelerine göre yapılan gruplandırmada; BDÖ, BAÖ ve SCL-90-R toplam puanı ile kişilerarası duyarlılık ortalaması gruplar arasında anlamlı düzeyde farklılık vardı. Sonuç: Dünya ortalamasına göre ülkemizde canlı verici sayısı kadavra vericiye göre daha fazla olup, genellikle verici adayları eş, birinci derece akraba gibi yakın aile içindeki bireylerden oluşmaktadır. Bu sebeple; nakil sürecinden doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak etkilenen aile içi ve yakın akrabalar verici adayı/verici olarak daha fazla ruhsal ve sosyal yönden etkilenebilmektedirler. Nakil süreci gibi uzun bir tedavi ve bakım gerektiren bir durumu iyi yönetebilmek için alıcı yanında vericilerin de psikososyal durumlarını değerlendirerek bu sürece dahil etmek gerekmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

İZCİ, F., FINDIKLI, E., ZİNCİR, S., CAMKURT, A., KİZİLKURT, O., GİYNAS, F., KORKMAZ, S., AKIN, E. B. (2017). Psychiatric Evaluation of Organ Donor Candidates in a University Hospital and Their Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life Levels. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 48–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/166970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Karasu Z. Live Donor Liver Transplantation; Current Situation in Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Internal Medical Sciences 2006; 2:1-5. (Turkish
  2. Pascher A, Sauer IM, Walter M, Lopez-Haeninnen E, Theruvath T, Spinelli A, Neuhaus R, Settmacher U, Mueller AR, Steinmueller T, Neuhaus P. Donor evaluation, donor risks, donor outcome, and donor quality of life in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2002; 8:829-837. [CrossRef] 3. Kim-Schluger L, Florman SS, Schiano T, O’Rourke M, Gagliardi R, Drooker M, Emre S, Fishbein TM, Sheiner PA, Schwartz ME, Miller CM. Quality of life after lobectomy for adult liver transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 73:1593-1597. [CrossRef] 4. Miyagi S, Kawagishi N, Fujimori K, Sekiguchi S, Fukumori T, Akamatsu Y, Satomi S. Risks of donation and quality of donors’ life after living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2005; 18:47-51. [CrossRef] 5. Schulz KH, Kroencke S, Beckmann M, Nadalin S, Paul A, Fischer L, Nashan B, Senf W, Erim Y. Mental and physical quality of life in actual living liver donors versus potential living liver donors: a prospective, controlled, multicenter study. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:1676-1687. [CrossRef] 6. Bilgin N, Moray G, Karakayali H, Demirag A, Tirnaksiz MB, Haberal M. Analysis of 1167 consecutive kidney transplants at our center. Transplant Proc 1999; 31:3107-3109. [CrossRef] 7. Haberal M, Tirnaksiz MB, Moray G, Karakayali H, Yildirim S, Demirag A, Bilgin N. Intrafamilial organ transplantation: a solution to organ shortage in developing countries. Transplant Proc 1999; 31:3383-3384. [CrossRef] 8. Faeder S, Moschenross D, Rosenberger E, Dew MA, DiMartini A. Pychiatric aspects of organ transplantation and donation. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2015; 28:357-364. [CrossRef] 9. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams Janet BW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinical Version (SCID-CV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc, 1996
  3. Corapcioglu A, Aydemir O, Yildiz M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Ankara: Hekimler Yayin Birligi, 1999
  4. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56:893-897. [CrossRef] 12. Ulusoy M, Sahin NH, Erkmen H. Turkish version of Beck anxiety inventory: psychometric properties. J Cogn Psychother 1998; 12:163-172
  5. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory f