Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Organizational Deviation Behavior and Task Performance among Job Performance Determinants

İş Performansı Belirleyicilerinden Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı, Örgütsel Sapma Davranışı ve Görev Performansı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Pages
317–329
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion – Although the findings of the research are similar to the results in previous studies, in general, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational deviation behavior may occur due to individual, organizational and situational factors, and the individual is likely to be involved in both types of behavior at the same time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – In this study, the effects of organizational citizenship and organizational deviation behaviors on the performance of public employees were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main basis of the study is to reveal the relationship between organizational citizenship, organizational deviation behavior and task performance variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion – Although the findings of the research are similar to the results in previous studies, in general, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational deviation behavior may occur due to individual, organizational and situational factors, and the individual is likely to be involved in both types of behavior at the same time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose – In this study, the effects of organizational citizenship and organizational deviation behaviors on the performance of public employees were investigated. The main basis of the study is to reveal the relationship between organizational citizenship, organizational deviation behavior and task performance variables. Design/methodology/approach – The population of this research is 59.554 personnel working in the public sector in Kocaeli. It was applied on 209 personnel with the cluster sampling method. The data obtained from the study were tested by using SPSS statistical program, descriptive factor analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis. Findings – Research findings show that organizational citizenship behavior and organizational deviation behaviors in one dimension are negative among them, there is a negative relationship between organizational citizenship and task performance and a positive relationship between organizational deviation and task performance and have a significant effect on each other. In addition, the correlation and regression analysis of the sub-dimensions of the variables have a partial relationship and effect between the variables. Discussion – Although the findings of the research are similar to the results in previous studies, in general, organizational citizenship behavior and organizational deviation behavior may occur due to individual, organizational and situational factors, and the individual is likely to be involved in both types of behavior at the same time.

Özet

Amaç – Bu araştırmada kamuda çalışan personelin örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel sapma davranışlarının görev performanslarına olan etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın temel dayanağı literatürde sınırlı sayıda çalışmaya rastlanan örgütsel vatandaşlık, örgütsel sapma davranışı ve görev performansı değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Yöntem – Bu araştırmanı evreni, Kocaeli ilinde kamuda görev yapan 59.554 personeldir. Kümelere göre örneklem yöntemiyle 209 personel üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen veriler SPSS istatistik programı kullanılarak açıklayıcı faktör analizi, korelasyon analizi ve regresyon analizleri ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular – Araştırma bulguları göstermektedir ki, tek boyutta ele alınan örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile örgütsel sapma davranışı arasında negatif, görev performansı ile pozitif bir ilişki vardır. Örgütsel sapma davranışı alt boyutu olan bireylerarası sapma davranışı ile görev performansı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmayıp, örgüte yönelik sapma davranışı ile görev performansı arasında negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca örgütsel vatandaşlık alt boyutlarıyla analiz edildiğinde ise örgütsel sapma davranışı alt boyutları arasında kısmi bir ilişki ve etki vardır. Tartışma – Araştırma bulguları önceki araştırmalardaki sonuçlarla benzerlik gösterse de, genel anlamda örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve örgütsel sapma davranışı bireysel, örgütsel ve durumsal faktörlerden dolayı gerçekleşebileceği gibi, bireyin her iki tür davranışa aynı anda dahil olması da muhtemeldir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇİN, K. (2021). Investigation of The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Organizational Deviation Behavior and Task Performance among Job Performance Determinants. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 317–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/217561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Apaydın, Ç., & Şirin, H. (2016). The Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Group Cohesiveness and Workplace Deviance Behavior of Turkish Teachers, International Education Studies, Vol. 9(10), 58-69
  2. Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836– 874. Avcı, N. (2008). Konaklama işletmelerinde örgütsel öğrenme, iş tutumları ve örgütsel sapma arasındaki ilişkinin analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, İzmir.
  3. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360.
  4. Booth-Butterfıeld, M., & Booth-Butterfıeld, S., (1991). Individual Differences in the Communication of Humorous Messages, Southern Communication Journal, 56, 32-40.
  5. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo S.J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain Include Elements of Contextual Performance, Schmitt, et al (eds), Personnel Selection in Organization, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. 71-98
  6. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection Research, Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
  7. Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowildo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 52-69.
  8. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists, London: Routledge. Bukhari, Z. U., & Ali, U. (2009). Relationship between organizational citizenship behavior & Counterproductive work behavior geographical context of Pakistan, International Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 85-92.
  9. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology, In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 687–732).
  10. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  11. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour and counterproductive work behaviour, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241-1255.
  12. Demir, M. (2009). Konaklama işletmelerinde duygusal zeka, örgütsel sapma, çalışma yaşamı kalitesi ve işten ayrılma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkinin analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayım