SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

FIELD PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT SEEDLING TYPES USED IN SWEET POTATO [Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam] GROWING

Gulsum OZTURK
Pages
54–59
Publication Date
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Genotype Yan Shu-1 had high means for single storage root weight (809.8 g), single plant yield (5.9 kg) and plot yield (43.3 kg).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to compare field performances of three sweet potato seedlings such as in vitro plantlets (IP) rooted cuttings (RC) and cuttings (C).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A field trial in the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications arranged in Split Plots (SP) was conducted in 2016 and 2017 in the experimental field of the Ege University located at Bornova.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Genotype Yan Shu-1 had high means for single storage root weight (809.8 g), single plant yield (5.9 kg) and plot yield (43.3 kg).
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:In vitro plantlets · root cuttings · cuttings

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare field performances of three sweet potato seedlings such as in vitro plantlets (IP) rooted cuttings (RC) and cuttings (C). A field trial in the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications arranged in Split Plots (SP) was conducted in 2016 and 2017 in the experimental field of the Ege University located at Bornova. The following results based on the analysis of data could be summarized: In vitro plantlets had the higher mean for the number of storage roots (8.4), single storage root weight (684.1 g), single plant yield (5.2 kg) and plot yield (37.0 kg). Genotype Lanceolado had high storage root number. Genotype Yan Shu-1 had high means for single storage root weight (809.8 g), single plant yield (5.9 kg) and plot yield (43.3 kg).

🔖

Cite This Article

OZTURK, G. (2021). FIELD PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT SEEDLING TYPES USED IN SWEET POTATO [Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam] GROWING. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 54–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/217488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acikgoz, N., E. Ilker, A. Gokcol. 2004. Evaluation of biological research in computer. E.U. TOTEM, Publication No:2, Izmir (in Turkish). Ahloowalia, B.S. 2004. Integration of technology from lab to land, Proceedings of a Technical Meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Vienna, 26–30 August, 2004.
  2. Alberto Cruz-Cruz, C., M.T. González-Arnao, F. Engelmann. 2013. Biotechnology and Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Resources 2: 73-95.
  3. Alcerono, R., A.G. Santiago, F. Morales, F. Rodriguez. 1975. Meristem tip culture and virus indexing of sweet potatoes. Phytopathology 65: 769-773.
  4. Alam, I., S.A. Sharmin, M.K. Naher, M.J. Alam, M. Anissuzzaman, M.F. Alam. 2010. Effect of growth regulators on meristem culture and plantlet establishment in sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.]. POJ. 3 (2):35-39.
  5. Braun, B. 2001. The maintenance of sweetpotato planting materials in Namibia: options for the development of a vıne production and distribution system. Agricola. p.15-20.
  6. Caliskan, M.E. S. Caliskan, U. Demirel, E. Aksoy, H.H. Arioglu. 2020. Starch and sugar plants production current and future, Turkey Agricultural Engineering IX. Technical Congress, p.453. Doliński, R. and A. Olek. 2013. Micropropagation of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) from Node Explant. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Culturs 12 (4): 117-127.
  7. Dugassa, G. and T. Feyissa. 2011. In Vitro Production of Virüs-Free Sweet Potato [Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam] by Meristem Culture and Termotherapy. Ethiop. J. Sci. 34(1): 17–28.
  8. Geren, H., G. Ozturk, Y.T. Kavut, Z. Yildirim. 2010. An investigation on silage possibilities of vines of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L.) genotypes grown under Bornova conditions. Journal of Ege University Faculty of Agriculture 47(2): 171-179.
  9. Hall, M.R. 1993. Yielding comparisons of pulled and cut sweet potato plants. Hortscience 28: 703-704.
  10. Jarret, R.L. 1990. In Vitro Active vs. Field Gene bank Maintenance of Sweet Potato Germplasm: Major Costs and Considerations. HortScience 25 (2). Kebede, T., T. Lemma, E. Tadesse, M. Guru, 2008. Effect of level of substitution of sweet potato (Ipomoea Batatas. L) vines for concentrate on body weight gain and carcass characteristics of browsing Arsi-Bale goats. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 2 (2): 36-42.
  11. Kodjo, G., E.K. Djidjolé, S. Mensah, T. Koffi, A. Atsou. 2013. Comparison of in vitro morphogenetic capacities of different clones of three local cultivars of sweet potato (I