SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

MARINA SELECTION OF YACHTSMEN USING AHP-TOPSIS AND AHP-PROMETHEE

Volkan EFECAN
İzzettin TEMİZ
Pages
14–24
Publication Date
2020-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, consistent and real-life results were obtained, it was concluded that AHP, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods could be used for decision support during selection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the scope of the research, determination of preference criteria of yacht owners, applicability of the most suitable marina and selected methods to the marina selection problem were evaluated and findings obtained by different methods were compared and to what extent these methods contributed to the decision-making process and how consistent they were.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the criteria of yacht owners to prefer marinas of our country are tried to be determined by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is one of the multi criteria decision making methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, consistent and real-life results were obtained, it was concluded that AHP, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods could be used for decision support during selection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marina Selection · Analytic Hierarchy Process · TOPSIS

Abstract

In the scope of the research, determination of preference criteria of yacht owners, applicability of the most suitable marina and selected methods to the marina selection problem were evaluated and findings obtained by different methods were compared and to what extent these methods contributed to the decision-making process and how consistent they were. In this study, the criteria of yacht owners to prefer marinas of our country are tried to be determined by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is one of the multi criteria decision making methods. Weight input values obtained by AHP were used in TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and PROMETHEE methods, which are multi-criteria decision-making methods, to evaluate yacht owners to determine the most suitable marina alternative for themselves. As a result of the study, consistent and real-life results were obtained, it was concluded that AHP, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods could be used for decision support during selection.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFECAN, V., TEMİZ, İ. (2020). MARINA SELECTION OF YACHTSMEN USING AHP-TOPSIS AND AHP-PROMETHEE. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 14–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/217018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Almoghathawi, Y., Barker, K., Rocco, C. M., & Nicholson, C. D. (2017). A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 158, 142-151.
  2. Ayşegül Şahin, C. A. (2013). Promethee Sıralama Yöntemi ile Portföy Oluşturma Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Journal of Economics and Management Research, 3(2). Şenkayas and Hekimoğlu, (2013). Çok Kriterli Tedarikçi seçimi problemine PROMETHEE yöntemi uygulaması, Verimlilik Dergisi, 4(2), 63-80.
  3. Brans, J. P. And Vincke, (1985), A Preference Ranking Organization Method. Management Science, 31(6):647-656.
  4. Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global Supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417-431.
  5. Dağdeviren, M., and Eraslan, E. (2008). Supplier Selection Using Promethee Sequencing Method, Gazi Üniversitesi. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der, 23(1), 69–75.
  6. Dikeç, Görkem and Töz, Ali, (2016). Marina Müşterilerinin Marinalarda Aldıkları Hizmetlerin Kalite Düzeylerine Yönelik Algılarının Analizi. III. Ulusal Deniz Turizmi Sempozyumu. Huang, C. C., Chu, P Y., &Chiang, Y. H. (2008). A Fuzzy AHP-based performance evaluation model for implementing SPC in the Taiwanese LCD industry. International Journal of Production Research, 47(18), 5163-5183.
  7. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Newyork. Güney, C. (2017). Visual Promethee ile Yatırımcılar Açısından Sektörlerin Değerlendirilmesi. International Scientific Peer-Reviewed and Refereed Journal, 9(34), 177–188.
  8. Işık, D. A., and Cerit, A. G. (2007). Yacht Tourism Education: A Study on Curriculums, 585–592.
  9. Mahdavi, I., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., Heidarzade, A., & Nourifar, R. (2008). Designing amodel of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making.Applied Mathematicsand Computation, 206, 607–617.
  10. Nas, S., Kan, N. (2014). Yacht Type Preference in Yacht Purchase Decision: A Case Study Through Yacht Owners at ic Cesme. Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 49–69.
  11. Yacht Statistics, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Https://Yigm.Ktb.Gov.Tr/Tr201145/Yatistatistikleri.Html. Accessed 10.10.2019
  12. Kahraman, C., Beskese, A., & Kaya, I. (2010). Selection among ERP outsourcing alternatives using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 547-566.
  13. Kecek, G., & Yüksel, R. (2016). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) ve PROMETHEE Teknikleriyle Ak