Journals / Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

A SURVEY OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN CONTAINER TERMINALS

Pages
77–88
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, future studies should consider reliable inputs such as the number of equipment in the terminal that divided by two group, the terminal area, maximum depth, pier length.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique has been used quite frequently in determining container terminal efficiency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the studies reviewed, conducted on the subject in the recent past, it is seen that the details such as the parameter on which the activity model focuses, sample selection, sample size and input-output selection have not yet been clarified enough, additionally, problems and confusion are encountered in practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, future studies should consider reliable inputs such as the number of equipment in the terminal that divided by two group, the terminal area, maximum depth, pier length.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Container Terminal · Productivity · Efficiency

Abstract

In recent years, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique has been used quite frequently in determining container terminal efficiency. When the studies reviewed, conducted on the subject in the recent past, it is seen that the details such as the parameter on which the activity model focuses, sample selection, sample size and input-output selection have not yet been clarified enough, additionally, problems and confusion are encountered in practice. In this study, a critical analysis was carried out regarding the determinations in the use of the DEA technique, which is frequently used in the measurement of container terminal efficiency, and on which issues should be considered in order to establish the model better. In the consequences of the study, it was seen that data accessibility was an obstacle to reaching more robust results in efficiency analysis. It is very important to make evaluations between ports that are close to each other in terms of regional or infrastructure, demand and technological development in order to obtain more reliable and consistent results. Moreover, future studies should consider reliable inputs such as the number of equipment in the terminal that divided by two group, the terminal area, maximum depth, pier length.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFECAN, V., TEMİZ, İ. (2020). A SURVEY OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN CONTAINER TERMINALS. Mersin University Journal of Maritime Faculty, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 77–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/217020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acer, A., Timor, M. (2017). The Evaluation of Turkish Container Terminal Efficiency Using by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Alphanumeric Journal, 5:2, 340–352.
  2. Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, P. (1977), Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37, 1977.
  3. Almawsheki, E. S., & Shah, M. Z. (2013). Technical Efficiency Analysis of Container Terminals in the Middle Eastern Region, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(4), 477-486.
  4. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30(9), 1078-1092.
  5. Baran, J., and Górecka, A. (2015). Seaport efficiency and productivity based on Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Productivity Index, Logistics &Sustainable Transport, 6(1), 25–33.
  6. Birafane, M., and Abdi, M. El. (2019). Efficiency of Moroccan Seaports: Application of DEA Using Window Analysis, Engineering, 11(02), 107–118.
  7. Bottasso, A., Conti, M., Ferrari, C. (2011), Efficiency and Productivity Growth in a Sample of Italian Containers Terminals, International Journal of Transport Economics, 38, 2, pp. 107–122.
  8. Çağlar, V., Oral, E., 2011, Türk Özel Limanlarının Etkinlik Verimlilik Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınları Carine, F. (2015). Analyzing the Operational Efficiency of Container Ports in Sub-Saharan Africa, Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(10):10-17.
  9. Caves, D., Christensen, L. and Diewert, W.E. (1982) the Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity. Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414.
  10. Charnes, A, Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  11. Chengpeng, W., Di, Z., Xinping, Y., &Zaili, Y. (2018). A Novel Model for the Quantitative Evaluation of Green Port Development – A Case Study of Major Ports in China. Transportation Research Part D, 61, 431–443.
  12. Cheon, S., Dowall, D. E., & Song, D. (2010). Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes: Ownership, corporate structure, and total factor productivity changes of world container ports. Transportation Research Part E, 46(4), 546–561.
  13. Cuccia, T. (2017). UNESCO sites and performance trend of Italian regional tourism destinations: A two-stage DEA window analysis with spatial interaction, Tourism Economics, 23(2), 316–342.
  14. Cullinane, K. and Song, D. (200