SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

An Exploration of Factors That Cause the Spontaneous Migration of Double-J Stents After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Furkan ŞENDOĞAN
Turgay TURAN
Özgür EFİLOĞLU
Ramazan Gökhan ATIŞ
Turhan ÇAŞKURLU
Asıf YILDIRIM
Pages
398–401
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An association was detected between JJ stent migration and an increase in stone size and the degree of hydronephrosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive and relatively new method of treatment for kidney stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Four hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent RIRS to treat kidney stones that were less than 2 cm in size and had JJ stents inserted intraoperatively between December 2013 and December 2017 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An association was detected between JJ stent migration and an increase in stone size and the degree of hydronephrosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive and relatively new method of treatment for kidney stones. We aimed to identify the factors that cause stent migration in patients who have undergone RIRS to treat kidney stones. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent RIRS to treat kidney stones that were less than 2 cm in size and had JJ stents inserted intraoperatively between December 2013 and December 2017 were included in this study. For each patient, demographic data and, if present, JJ stent migration direction and postoperative complications were recorded. Twenty-eight patients who experienced JJ stent migration (group 1) and 400 patients who did not experience the migration (group 2) were compared. Results: Postoperative complications developed in a total of 39 (9.1%) patients. Seventeen complications were evaluated as minor (Clavien 1–2) and 22 (5.1%) were evaluated as major. Almost all of the major complications (n=21) were found to be associated with JJ stent migration. Urosepsis was detected in only one patient (Clavien 4). The mean ages in groups 1 and 2 were 45.4±17.3 years and 44.3±15.1 years, respectively. The mean stone size in group 1 was 16.9±3.0 mm, whereas it was 14.2±5.3 mm in group 2 (p=0.031). A comparison of both the groups showed that the likelihood of an occurrence of JJ stent migration increased significantly with the degree of hydronephrosis (p<0.001). Conclusion: JJ stent migration after RIRS increases the rate of major complications. An association was detected between JJ stent migration and an increase in stone size and the degree of hydronephrosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENDOĞAN, F., TURAN, T., EFİLOĞLU, Ö., ATIŞ, R. G., ÇAŞKURLU, T., YILDIRIM, A. (2019). An Exploration of Factors That Cause the Spontaneous Migration of Double-J Stents After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 398–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/216830

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Danuser H, Müller R, Descoeudres B, Dobry E, Studer UE. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 2007; 52(2): 539–46
  2. Yildirim A, Senkul T, Sarica K, Öztürk M, Gürbüz C, Ates F, et al. Have the technological advancements changed the distribution of treatment modalities in urolithiasis? European Urology Supplements 2011; 10(7): 516–7
  3. Argyropoulos AN, Tolley DA. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 2010; 20(2): 154–8
  4. Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang C, Wei W, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones> 2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int 2014; 93(4): 417–24
  5. Giusti G, Proietti S, Luciani LG, Peschechera R, Giannantoni A, Taverna G, et al. Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? Can J Urol 2014; 21(2): 7207–12
  6. Türk C, Petrik, Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European association of urology 2017 [cited 2017 10.12.2017]. Available from: URL: http://uroweb.org/guideline/ urolithiasis/
  7. Breda A, Angerri O. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm. Curr Opin Urol 2014; 24(2): 179–83
  8. Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 2008; 32(6): 939–41
  9. Oguz U, Resorlu B, Ozyuvali E, Bozkurt OF, Senocak C, Unsal A. Categorizing intraoperative complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urol Int 2014; 92(2): 164–8
  10. De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur Urol 2015; 67(1): 125–37
  11. Xu Y, Min Z, Wan SP, Nie H, Duan G. Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system. Urolithiasis 2018: 46(2): 197–202
  12. Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C, De Sio M, Autorino R, D’Armiento M. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 2002; 69(2): 136–40
  13. Hao P, Li W, Song C, Yan J, Song B, Li L. Clinical evaluation of double- pigtail stent in patients with upper urinary tract diseases: report of 2685 cases. J Endourol 2008; 22(1): 65–70
  14. Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Mondal PP, Pal DK. Long-term complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review. Urology Annals 2015; 7(1):