Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

The factors predicting upgrading of prostate cancer by using International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system

Pages
36–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Five-year biochemicalrecurrence-free survival rate was 86% in the non-GSU group and 55% in the GSU group (p<0.001).Conclusion: GSU risk should be taken into consideration in making therapeutic decisions for older patientswith prostate cancer, and precautions should be taken against development of aggressive disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the factors to predict Gleason score upgrading (GSU) of patients with prostate cancer whowere evaluated by using the International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system.Material and methods: Between January 2008 and December 2015, we retrospectively investigated patients whohad undergone radical prostatectomy and followed up in the uro-oncology outpatient clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pathologic specimens of the patients were evaluated based on the ISUP 2014 classification system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Five-year biochemicalrecurrence-free survival rate was 86% in the non-GSU group and 55% in the GSU group (p<0.001).Conclusion: GSU risk should be taken into consideration in making therapeutic decisions for older patientswith prostate cancer, and precautions should be taken against development of aggressive disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To investigate the factors to predict Gleason score upgrading (GSU) of patients with prostate cancer whowere evaluated by using the International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system.Material and methods: Between January 2008 and December 2015, we retrospectively investigated patients whohad undergone radical prostatectomy and followed up in the uro-oncology outpatient clinic. The pathologic specimens of the patients were evaluated based on the ISUP 2014 classification system. The patients were divided intotwo groups with or without upgraded Gleason scores. Factors that could be effective in predicting upgrading such asage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, D’Amico risk classification, PSA density, cancer of the prostaterisk assessment (CAPRA) scores, biopsy tumor percentage, body mass index, and clinical stage parameters werecompared between both groups.Results: Of the 265 patients who could be evaluated and followed up regularly, Gleason score upgradeswere observed in 110 (41.5%) patients. Advanced age (p=0.009), PSA >20 ng/mL (p=0.036), PSA density>0.35 (p=0.005), high CAPRA score (p=0.031), and high biopsy tumor percentage (p=0.009) were discovered to be correlated with Gleason score upgrade in univariate logistic regression analysis. Advanced agealone was a predictor for GSU in multivariate logistic regression analysis (p=0.002). Five-year biochemicalrecurrence-free survival rate was 86% in the non-GSU group and 55% in the GSU group (p<0.001).Conclusion: GSU risk should be taken into consideration in making therapeutic decisions for older patientswith prostate cancer, and precautions should be taken against development of aggressive disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, T., GÜÇLÜER, B., EFİLOĞLU, Ö., ŞENDOĞAN, F., ATIŞ, R. G., ÇAŞKURLU, T., YILDIRIM, A. (2019). The factors predicting upgrading of prostate cancer by using International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 36–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/379804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2017
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 2016
  4. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, MagiGalluzzi C, et al. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol 2016
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Kvale R, Moller B, Wahlqvist R, Fossa SD, Berner A, Busch C, et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. BJU Int 2009
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Gershman B, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, Young RH, McDougal WS, Wu CL. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading. In: Urol Oncol: Seminars and Original Investigations: 2013: Elsevier
  7. Caster JM, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, Chen RC. Risk of pathologic upgrading or locally advanced disease in early prostate cancer patients based on biopsy Gleason score and PSA: a populationbased study of modern patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Herlemann A, Buchner A, Kretschmer A, Apfelbeck M, Stief CG, Gratzke C, et al. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men≥ 75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Urol 2017
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Yang DD, Mahal BA, Muralidhar V, Nezolosky MD, Vastola ME, Labe SA, et al. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+ 4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2017. pii: S2405-4569(17)30148-7. 10. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Davies JD, Aghazadeh MA, Phillips S, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, et al. Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol