Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

CORRELATION BETWEEN SPT AND PMT RESULTS FOR SANDY AND CLAYEY SOILS

Pages
175–188
Publication Date
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highly accurate prediction performance of the proposed model demonstrated the availability of modern methods for the estimation of soil parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Determination of soil deformation and strength properties is of great importance in geotechnical design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a total of 102 data of sandy and clayey soils belonging to the geotechnical investigations carried out in Istanbul were compiled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highly accurate prediction performance of the proposed model demonstrated the availability of modern methods for the estimation of soil parameters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Standard prenetration test · Pressuremeter test · Correlation

Abstract

Determination of soil deformation and strength properties is of great importance in geotechnical design. The disturbance that occurred during the sampling from the field affects the results obtained by the laboratory tests. Therefore, the lack of representation of the field conditions and in-situ soil features with laboratory tests leads the designers to carry out field tests. Standard penetration test (SPT) and the Menard pressuremeter test (PMT) are the most widely used geotechnical field tests in which the results are utilized to investigate soil properties and lateral deformation characteristics at a specified depth. In this study, a total of 102 data of sandy and clayey soils belonging to the geotechnical investigations carried out in Istanbul were compiled. The regression analysis between the corrected SPT blow count N60, pressuremeter modulus EPMT, limit pressure PL and EPMT/PL ratio is performed. Empirical equations were separately developed for sandy and clayey soils between the considered parameters. The developed equations showed that there are acceptable relationships between the parameters examined in the particular dataset. Moreover, a neural network (NN) based prediction model was developed to predict EPMT and PL using the available soil data. The highly accurate prediction performance of the proposed model demonstrated the availability of modern methods for the estimation of soil parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, Ö. (2021). CORRELATION BETWEEN SPT AND PMT RESULTS FOR SANDY AND CLAYEY SOILS. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 175–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/216791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Sanglerat G. The Penetration and Soil Exploration; Interpretation of Penetration-Diagrams Theory and Practice. Elsevier Publishing Co, Amsterdam, 1997
  2. Terzaghi K, Peck RB. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1967
  3. Kögler F. Baugrundprüfung im Bohrloch. Der Bauingenieur 1933; 14: 266-27
  4. Menard L. Mesure in-situ des proprietes des sols Annales des ponts et chaussees 1957;14:357-377
  5. Leischner W. Die bautechnische Baugrundbeurteilung mittels horizontaler Belastungsversuche im Bohrloch nach dem Koglerverfahren. Der Bauingenier 1966; 12
  6. Shields DH, Bauer GH. Determination of the modulus of deformation of sensitive clay using laboratory and in situ tests. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Special Conference on in situ measurement of soil properties, Raleigh, 1975; 1: 395–421
  7. Lee KM, RK Rowe. Deformation caused by surface loading and tunneling: the role of elastic anisotropy. Geotechnique 1989; 39(1):125–140
  8. Ohya S, Imai T, Matsubara M. Relation between N value by SPT and LLT pressuremeter results in Proceeding 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, 1982;1: 125–130
  9. Briaud JL. The Pressuremeter. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1992
  10. Gonin H, Vandangeon P, Lafeullade MP. Correlation study between standard penetration and pressuremeter tests. Rev Fr Ge´otech 1992; 58:67–78
  11. Yagiz S, Akyol E, Sen G. Relationship between the standard penetration test and the pressuremeter test on sandy silty clays: A case study from Denizli. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2008; 67(3): 405–410
  12. Alzubaidi R. Variations in pressuremeter modulus (EM). International Journal of GEOMATE 2016; 10(1): 1675–1679
  13. Kenmogne E, Martin JR, Geofor, SA. Correlation studies between SPT and Pressuremeter tests, in: Proceedings of the 15th African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2011
  14. Cheshomi A, Ghodrati M. Estimating Menard pressuremeter modulus and limit pressure from SPT in silty sand and silty clay soils. A case study in Mashhad, Iran Int. J. Geomech. Geoeng. 2014; 10(3): 194-202
  15. Anwar M.B. Correlation between PMT and SPT results for calcareous soil. HBRC Journal, 2018; 14(1): 50–55
  16. Bozbey I, Togrol E. Correlation of standard penetration test and pressuremeter data: A case study from Istanbul, Turkey. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2010; 69(4): 505–515
  17. Kayabasi A. Prediction of pressuremeter modulus an