Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 61

Adaptation of Collective Resilience Scale to Turkish Culture and Examination of its Psychometric Properties

Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanarak Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
161–175
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Reliability analysis results indicated an adequate confidence interval.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Collective Resilience Scale by adapting it to Turkish culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consisted of 602 participants between 18 and 66 years of age, 311 of them being females and 291 males.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Reliability analysis results indicated an adequate confidence interval.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kolektif Dayanıklılık · Güvenirlik · Geçerlik

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Collective Resilience Scale by adapting it to Turkish culture. The sample of the study consisted of 602 participants between 18 and 66 years of age, 311 of them being females and 291 males. In consequence of the confirmatory factor analysis conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale, it was determined that the fit indices were within acceptable values. Reliability analysis results indicated an adequate confidence interval. In consequence of the research, it was determined that the Collective Resilience Scale is a valid and reliable measurement and data collection tool that can be used in academic and field studies. The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature and various suggestions were made.

Özet

Bu araştırmada Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanarak psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma grubu, yaşları 18-66 arasında değişen 311 kadın ve 291 erkek olmak üzere toplam 602 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını incelemek için yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir sınırlar içinde yer aldığı tespit edilmiştir. Güvenirlik analizi sonuçları yeterli güven aralığına işaret etmiştir. Yapılan araştırma sonucunda Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin akademik ve saha çalışmalarında kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme ve veri toplama aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bulgular alan yazın çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALMIŞ, İ., AKDENİZ, S., HAMARTA, E. (2021). Adaptation of Collective Resilience Scale to Turkish Culture and Examination of its Psychometric Properties. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 61, 161–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/216369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Büyükozturk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation]. Pegem. Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3 (1), 14-25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/bs.3830030103
  2. Chandra, A., Acosta, J., Meredith, L.S., Snaches, K., Stern, S., Uscher-Pines, L. Williams, M., & Yeung, D. (2010). Understanding community resilience in the context of national health security. Rand Corporation. Drury, J. (2012). Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health and well-being (pp. 195–215).
  3. Psychology Press.
  4. Drury, J., Cocking, C., & Reicher, S. (2009). The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 27(1), 66-95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228642933_The_Nature_of_Collective_Resilience_Survivor_Reactions_to_the_2005_London_Bombings Drury J. & Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005
  5. Dynes, R.R. (2003). Finding order in disorder: Continuities in the 9-11 response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21(3), 9-23. http://ijmed.org/articles/229/download/
  6. Elcheroth, G. & Drury, J. (2020). Collective resilience in times of crisis: Lessons from the literature for socially effective responses to the pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12403
  7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGrawHill. Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In A. Dickson (Ed.), Civilization, society and religion (pp. 91-178).
  8. Penguin. Johnson, N.R. (1988). Fire in a crowded theatre: A descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 6 (1), 7-26. http://ijmed.org/articles/134/download/
  9. Kendra, J., & Wachtendorf, T. (2001). Elements of community resilience in the World Trade Center attack. https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstr