SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 32

Aesthetics in Theatre: The Challenge of Effect Under the Skin

Guilherme Filipe(University of Lisbon, Faculty of Fine Arts and Humanities, Theatre Studies Centre, Lisbon, Portugal)0000-0001-7425-9937
Pages
75–94
Publication Date
2021-06-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the work of many outstanding authors on this matter, our modernity is brought to understand that the dramaturgy of mankind will go on being the dramaturgy of theatrical performance, as a form of Art, being the transubstantiation of an ordinary world into a transcendent world of signs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The tremendous socio-political transformations that took place in the 19th century contributed to the change of criterion for theatre dramaturgy during the following century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This essay presents a panoramic view of ways of comprehending aesthetics along the 20th century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the work of many outstanding authors on this matter, our modernity is brought to understand that the dramaturgy of mankind will go on being the dramaturgy of theatrical performance, as a form of Art, being the transubstantiation of an ordinary world into a transcendent world of signs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:20th century · Avant-garde(s) · Western Dramaturgies

Abstract

The tremendous socio-political transformations that took place in the 19th century contributed to the change of criterion for theatre dramaturgy during the following century. The essence of the history of theatre, as “liminal space”, based on traditional perspectives of theatre illusion and dramatization of identity crisis suffered a profound revolution due to the decay and loss of essential values, thus leading to the emergence of the “theatre of the ‘new’ man”. This essay presents a panoramic view of ways of comprehending aesthetics along the 20th century. Through the work of many outstanding authors on this matter, our modernity is brought to understand that the dramaturgy of mankind will go on being the dramaturgy of theatrical performance, as a form of Art, being the transubstantiation of an ordinary world into a transcendent world of signs.

Özet

The tremendous socio-political transformations that took place in the 19th century contributed to the change of criterion for theatre dramaturgy during the following century. The essence of the history of theatre, as “liminal space”, based on traditional perspectives of theatre illusion and dramatization of identity crisis suffered a profound revolution due to the decay and loss of essential values, thus leading to the emergence of the “theatre of the ‘new’ man”. This essay presents a panoramic view of ways of comprehending aesthetics along the 20th century. Through the work of many outstanding authors on this matter, our modernity is brought to understand that the dramaturgy of mankind will go on being the dramaturgy of theatrical performance, as a form of Art, being the transubstantiation of an ordinary world into a transcendent world of signs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Filipe, G. (2021). Aesthetics in Theatre: The Challenge of Effect Under the Skin. Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi, Sayı: 32, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.26650/jtcd.894645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. & Horkheimmer, Max. Dialetic of Enlightenment, translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. google scholar
  2. Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory, Translated by R. Hullot-Kentor Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997. google scholar
  3. Adorno, Theodor W. Negative Dialectics, Translated by E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press, 1973. google scholar
  4. Aristotle. The Poetics of Aristotle. Translated by S. H. Butcher. 3ed edition revised. London: Macmillan, 1902. google scholar
  5. Baudelaire, Charles, “Le beau, la mode et le bonheur”, Le Figaro 916 (26.11.1863), 1-2. google scholar
  6. Benjamin, Walter, “The task of the Translator.” In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by Harry Zohn. Edited by Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books, 1968, 69-82. google scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by Harry Zohn. Edited by Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books, 1968, 217-252. google scholar
  8. Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of German Tragic Drama, Translated by John Osborne. Verso books, 2003. google scholar
  9. Braun, Edward. The Theatre of Meyerhold: Revolution and the Modern Stage. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1995. google scholar
  10. Brecht, Bertolt & Willett, John. Brecht on theatre: the development of an aesthetic. New York: Hill and Wang, 1964. google scholar
  11. Buse, Peter, “Archaeology of an acting style: Stanislavski, Brecht and the subject”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2 (1998), 219-238. google scholar
  12. Cano-Ruiz, J., “As emotividades e o sentimento humano da Arte”, A Batalha 115, 5-6. google scholar
  13. Craig, Edward Gordon. On the Art of Theatre. 5th ed. London: William Heinemann, 1911. google scholar
  14. Croce, Benedetto. Aesthetics as a science of expression and general linguistics, Translated by Douglas Ainsle. London: MacMillan and Co, 1909. google scholar
  15. Dufrenne, Mikel. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, Translated by Edward S. Casey. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. google scholar
  16. Elam, Keir. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London/ New York: Routledge, 1980. google scholar
  17. Fechner, Gustav Theodor. Vorschule der Aesthetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1876. google scholar
  18. Ferreira, Guilherme Pires, “O conceito de Belo em geral na Estetica de Hegel: Conceito, ideia e verdade”, Revista Eletrönica Print by MeTâvoıa, Sâo Joâo del-Rei/MG, 13 (2011), 81-90 http://www.ufsj.edu.br/ revistalable. google scholar
  19. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. History of European Drama and Theatre. Translated by Joe Riley. London/ New York: Routledge, 2002 [1st ed. 1990]. google scholar
  20. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Show and the Gaze of Theatre: A European perspective. Translated by Joe Riley. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1997. google scholar
  21. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. Translated by Saskya Iris Jain. London/New York: Routledge, 2008. google scholar
  22. Flynn, Daniel J. Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas. New Yor: Crown Forum, 2004. google scholar
  23. Holman, Christopher. Politics as radical Creation: Herbert Marcuse and Hannah Arendt. Toronto/Buffalo/ London: University of Toronto Press, 2013. google scholar
  24. Hoover, Marjorie L. Meyerhold: The art of conscious theatre. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press, 1974. google scholar
  25. Huisman, Denis. L’Esthetique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954. google scholar
  26. Hulle, Dirk van. A new Cambridge companion to Samuel Beckett. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2015. google scholar
  27. Jangfeldt, Bengt. Majakovsky and futurism 1917-1921. Stockolm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1976. google scholar
  28. Loureiro, Isabel Maria (ed.), HerbertMarcuse: A grande recusa hoje. Petropolis: Vozes, 1999. google scholar
  29. Picon-Vallin, Beatrice, “Vers un ‘super-acteur’?” In Etudes theâtrales, L’acteur entre personnage et performance 26 (2003), 59-68. google scholar
  30. Pinho, Eunice, “A Estetica de Dufrenne ou a Procura da Origem”, Revista Filosöfica de Coimbra V.3, 6 (1994), 361-396. google scholar
  31. Piscator, Erwin. The Political Theatre. A History 1914-1929. Translated by Hugh Rorrison. London: Eyre Methuen, 1980. google scholar
  32. Proust, Sophie. La direction d’acteurs dans la mise en scene theâtrale contemporaine. Paris: L’Entretemps, 2006. google scholar
  33. Saussure, Ferdinand de. Cours de Linguistique Generale. C. Bally et A. Sechehaye (ed.). Lausanne/ Paris: Payot, 1916. google scholar
  34. Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by W. Baskin. Glasgow: Fontana/ Collins, 1977. google scholar
  35. Schelling, Friedrich von. The Philosophy of Art; An Oration on the Relation between the Plastic Arts and Nature. Translated A. Johnson. London: John Chapman, 1845. google scholar
  36. Vitez, Antoine & Curmi, Andre, “La ‘direction d’acteur’”, Theâtre/Public 64-65 (juillet 1985). google scholar
  37. Weiberger, Jean. Les avant-gardes litteraires au XXe siecle. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamin publishing Company, 1984. google scholar
  38. Weimann, Robert, “Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre”, in Cambridge Studies in Renaissance Literature and Culture. Edited by Helen Higbee and William West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. google scholar
  39. Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory, Translated by R. Hullot-Kentor Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 1997. google scholar
  40. Adorno, Theodor W. Negative Dialectics, Translated by E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press, 1973. google scholar
  41. Huisman, Denis. L’Esthetique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954. google scholar