Journals / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy for the USA Consumption Stationarity Test for the USA: Evidence from Fourier Tests

ABD için Yenilenebilir ve Yenilenemez Enerji Tüketimi Durağanlık Sınaması: Fourier Testlerden Kanıtlar

Pages
123–141
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, it has been found that both renewable and non-renewable energy consumption of the USA is not stationary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Energy is a driving force for economic activity and industrial development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, Fourier-based unit root tests, which were brought to the literature by Christopoulos and Leon-Ledesma (2010), were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it has been found that both renewable and non-renewable energy consumption of the USA is not stationary.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yenilenebilir Enerji · Yenilenemez Enerji · Fourier Foksiyon

Abstract

Energy is a driving force for economic activity and industrial development. Researching the stationarity of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption together has become an important research branch in energy economics. There are not many studies in the literature investigating whether shocks to renewable and non- renewable energy consumption have temporary or permanent effects. In this context, in this study, it is desired to test the stationarity of renewable (Nuclear electricity, Hydroelectric power consumption, Geothermal Energy and Biomass Energy) and non-renewable (Coal, Natural Gas, Oil) energy consumption for the USA. For this purpose, Fourier-based unit root tests, which were brought to the literature by Christopoulos and Leon-Ledesma (2010), were used. Annual data on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption covering the period 1960-2020 were obtained from the official database of the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). According to the results obtained, it has been found that both renewable and non-renewable energy consumption of the USA is not stationary. For the test, which only takes into account the nonlinearity, it is seen that the oil consumption is stationary at the %10 level.

Özet

Enerji, ekonomik faaliyet ve endüstriyel gelişme için itici bir güçtür. Yenilenebilir ve yenilenemez enerji tüketiminin durağanlığının birlikte araştırılması, enerji ekonomisinde önemli bir araştırma dalı haline gelmiştir. Yenilenebilir ve yenilenemez enerji tüketimine yönelik şokların geçici veya kalıcı etkileri olup olmadığını birlikte araştıran çalışma ise literatürde çok fazla bulunmamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada ABD için yenilenebilir (Nükleer elektrik, Hidroelektrik güç tüketimi, Jeotermal Enerji ve Biyokütle Enerjisi) ve yenilenemez (Kömür, Doğal Gaz, Petrol) enerji tüketiminin durağanlığı sınanmak istenmektedir. Bu amaçla Christopoulos ve Leon- Ledesma (2010) tarafından literatüre kazandırılan Fourier temelli birim kök testleri kullanılmıştır. 1960-2020 dönemini kapsayan yenilenebilir ve yenilenemez enerji tüketimi yıllık verilerine ABD Enerji Bilgi İdaresi (EIA) resmi veri tabanından ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre ABD’nin hem yenilenebilir hem de yenilenemeyen enerji tüketiminin durağan olmadığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Sadece doğrusal olmama durumunu dikkate alan test için petrol tüketiminin %10 düzeyinde durağan olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

FENDOĞLU, E. (2021). Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy for the USA Consumption Stationarity Test for the USA: Evidence from Fourier Tests. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 123–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/216285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. "Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries." Energy policy 38.1 (2010): 656-660.
  2. Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. "Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries." Energy Policy 38.3 (2010): 1353-1359.
  3. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy policy, 38(1), 656-660.
  4. Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. "Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption–growth nexus: evidence from emerging market economies." Applied Energy 88.12 (2011): 5226-5230.
  5. Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. "The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America." Applied Energy 88.1 (2011): 343-347.
  6. Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption- growth nexus: Evidence from a panel error correction model." Energy economics 34.3 (2012): 733-738.
  7. Aslan, Alper. "Does natural gas consumption follow a nonlinear path over time? Evidence from 50 US States." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15.9 (2011): 4466-4469.
  8. Aslan, Alper, and Hakan Kum. "The stationary of energy consumption for Turkish disaggregate data by employing linear and nonlinear unit root tests." Energy 36.7 (2011): 4256-4258.
  9. Becker, Ralf, Walter Enders, and Junsoo Lee. "A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks." Journal of Time Series Analysis 27.3 (2006): 381-409. BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2020). https://enerji.mmo.org.tr/wp- content/uploads/2020/07/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 23/05/2021.
  10. Burakov, Dmitry. "Are oil shocks permanent or temporary? Panel data evidence from crude oil production in 15 countries." International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 9.2 (2019): 295. Carrion-i-Silvestre, Josep Lluís, Dukpa Kim, and Pierre Perron. "GLS-based unit root tests with multiple structural breaks under both the null and the alternative hypotheses." Econometric theory (2009): 1754-1792.
  11. Chen, Pei-Fen, and Chien-Chiang Lee. "Is energy consumption per capita broken stationary? New evidence from regional-based panels." Energy Policy 35.6 (2007): 3526-3540.
  12. Christopoulos, Dimitris K., and Miguel A. León-Ledesma. "Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates." Journal of International Money and Finance 29.6 (2010): 1076-1093.
  13. Derrick, F. O. S.