SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

An Examination on Manegers’ Opinions on the Importance of Cultural Intelligence

Hasan TUTAR
Vjose HAJRULLAHU
Nevzat SAHIN
Pages
2717–2728
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion – The findings of the study showed that for the managers, cultural intelligence levels of employees was a critical success factors in adapting to colleagues, managers, organizational and managerial processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Especially, adaptation to multicultural work environments is of great importance for organizational performance as well as for individual performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings – The data of the study were collected from a group of 8 participants with a semi-structured interview form and the study group was determined according to the “purposive sampling” techniques and the “criteria sampling” technique by taking into consideration the general fiction and problem of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion – The findings of the study showed that for the managers, cultural intelligence levels of employees was a critical success factors in adapting to colleagues, managers, organizational and managerial processes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – Especially, adaptation to multicultural work environments is of great importance for organizational performance as well as for individual performance. The aim of this study is to determine the opinions of the managers of a multinational businesses operating in Kosovo regarding the importance of the cultural intelligence of the employees. Design/methodology/approach – The study is a qualitative research in terms of its methodology and it was designed according to the descriptive phenomenological design. Findings – The data of the study were collected from a group of 8 participants with a semi-structured interview form and the study group was determined according to the “purposive sampling” techniques and the “criteria sampling” technique by taking into consideration the general fiction and problem of the study. Content analysis technique was used in the analysis of the data of the study. Discussion – The findings of the study showed that for the managers, cultural intelligence levels of employees was a critical success factors in adapting to colleagues, managers, organizational and managerial processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAR, H., HAJRULLAHU, V., SAHIN, N. (2019). An Examination on Manegers’ Opinions on the Importance of Cultural Intelligence. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 2717–2728. https://ajindex.com/articles/216090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ang, S., Dyne, L.V. (2008). Conceptualization of Cultural İntelligence: Definition, Distinctiveness, and Nomological Network. In Handbook of cultural intelligence, Ang, S. and Van Dyne, L. (Ed.) New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 21-33
  2. Ang, S., Dyne L.V.(2008) Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. Aycan, Z. (1997). Expatriate Ad justment as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: Individual and Organizational Level Predictors. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(4), 434-456.
  3. Barakat, L. L., Lorenz, M. P., Ramsey, J. R., & Cretoiu, S. L. (2015). Global Managers: An Analysis of the İmpact of cultural İntelligence on Job Satisfaction and Performance. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 781-800.
  4. Berry, J. W. (1992). Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society. International Migration, 30, 69-69.
  5. Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An introduction to theory and Methods. Allyn and Bacon. Bryman, A. (2004). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. Routledge. Brett, J., Behfar, K., Kern, M. C. (2009). Managing Multicultural Teams. The Essential Guide to Leadership, 85. Büyükbeşe, T., Yıldız, B. (2016). Kültürel Zekanın Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisİ. Journal of International Social Research, 9(45).438-448.
  6. Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research. The Sage handbook of Qualitative research, 4(1), 359-380.
  7. Cohen, L., Manion, L. &Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. Cozby, C. P. (1989). Methods in Behavioral Research (4th Edn.), Mountain View. CA: Mayfield Publishing Company Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Creswell, J. W. (1998).Research design. Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative. Boston: Pearson Demirel, H. G., Kişman, Z. A. (2014). Kültürler Arası Liderlik. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(5). Earley, P. C., Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural İntelligence. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 139-146.
  8. Ersoy, A., & Ehtiyar, R. (2015). Kültürel Farklılıkların Yönetiminde Kültürel Zekânın Rolü: Türk ve Yabancı Yöneticiler Üzerine bir Araştırma. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(1), 42-60.
  9. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The theory of Multiple İntelligences. London: Fontana. Greasley,