Journals / Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

DOES GENERAL STRAIN THEORY ACCOUNT FOR YOUTH DEVIANCE IN TURKEY?

GENEL GERİLİM TEORİSİ TÜRKİYE’DEKİ GENÇ SOSYAL SAPMASINI AÇIKLAR MI?

Pages
107–129
Publication Date
2012-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, data gave some support for GST.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: This study was aimed to explore whether General Strain Theory accounted for youth deviance in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The theory was tested by using a sample of 974 undergraduate university students in a correlational study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, data gave some support for GST.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:General Strain Theory · deviance · crime

Abstract

Abstract: This study was aimed to explore whether General Strain Theory accounted for youth deviance in Turkey. The theory was tested by using a sample of 974 undergraduate university students in a correlational study. Youth deviance included piracy, bribery, and cheating. Of the total twelve strain variables used, half of them were statistically significant and had expected positive influences on the dependent variables. Anger was positively correlated only with one dependent variable. Most criminal and non-criminal coping variables had expected impacts on the deviant behavior. Overall, data gave some support for GST. Future tests of General Strain Theory should use more negative emotions, utilize an index of strain, be tested with males and females etc. Keywords: General Strain Theory, deviance, crime, youth, Turkey

Özet

Bu çalışma Genel Gerilim Teori‘sinin Türkiye‘de genç sapmasını açıklayıp-açıklayamadığını keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlgili teori, korelasyon analizi yardımı ile, 974 üniversite öğrencisi örneği yardımı ile test edilmiştir. Genç sapması korsancılık, rüşvet ve kopya çekme davranışlarını içermektedir. Araştırmada kullanılan toplam on iki gerilim/stres değişkenlerinden sadece altısı istatistiksel olarak önemli ve bağımlı değişkenler üzerinde beklenen pozitif etkileri göstermişlerdir. Kızgınlık sadece bir değişkenle (beklenen) pozitif korelasyona sahiptir. Çoğu suçu kolaylaştırıcı ve suçu önleyici faktörler beklenen etkileri göstermiştir. Genel olarak, veriler Genel Gerilim Teori‘sini kısmen desteklemiştir. İleride yapılacak araştırmalar teoriyi test ederken daha fazla negatif duygulara yer vermeli, gerilim indeks halinde kullanmalı, cinsiyet temelinde analizler yapmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

Özbay, Ö. (2012). DOES GENERAL STRAIN THEORY ACCOUNT FOR YOUTH DEVIANCE IN TURKEY?. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 107–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/215690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-87.
  2. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured Into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory, Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company. Agnew, R. (2009). General Strain Theory: Current Status and Directions for Further Research In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, Vol.15 (p. 101-121), New Brunswick: Transaction. Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 475-499.
  3. Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43-72.
  4. Aseltine, H. R., Jr., Gore, S., & Gordon, J. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 256-275.
  5. Bao, W., Haas, A., & Pi, Y. (2004). Life strain, negative emotions, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory in the people‘s republic of China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 281-297.
  6. Bao, W., & Pi, Y. (2007). Life strain, coping, and delinquency in the people‘s republic of China: An empirical test of general strain theory from a matching perspective in social support. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 9-24.
  7. Baron, W. S. (2004). General strain, street youth and crime: A test of Agnew‘s revised theory. Criminology, 42, 457-438.
  8. Baron, W. S. (2007). Street youth, gender, financial strain, and crime: Exploring Broidy and Agnew‘s extension to general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 28, 273-302.
  9. Baron, W. S. (2008). Street youth, unemployment, and crime: Is it that simple? Using general strain theory to untangle the relationship. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 399-434.
  10. Baron, W. S., & Hartnagel, T. F. (1997). Attributions, affect, and crime: Street youths‘ reactions to unemployment. Criminology, 35, 409-434.
  11. Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.
  12. Benda, B. B., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). The effect of abuse in childhood and in adolescence on violence among adolescents. Youth & Society, 33, 339-365.
  13. Brezina, T., Piquero, Alex R., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). Student anger and aggressive behavior in school: An initial test of Agnew‘s m