SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2009 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Fen ve teknoloji dersi bilimsel tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Reliability and validity studies of the science and technology course scientific attitude scale

Şefik YAŞAR
Şengül S. ANAGÜN
Pages
43–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of factor analysis, the scale grouped in with three factors accounted for 42,08% of total variance with 28 items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Science is a basic course that improves the individuals in terms of cognitive aspects and increases their creativity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected from 887 students of randomly selected 14 elementary schools in the city of Eskişehir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of factor analysis, the scale grouped in with three factors accounted for 42,08% of total variance with 28 items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Science is a basic course that improves the individuals in terms of cognitive aspects and increases their creativity. In this course, students acquire the habits of thinking objectively and making right decisions about the phenomena and events by examining their environment with scientific methods. In this process, an effort is spent to make students gain scientific knowledge, cognitive process skills and scientific attitudes. Scientific attitudes have an important role in developing scientific literacy. The purpose of this study is to bring up the results of reliability and validity studies of an instrument which is developed for determining scientific attitudes of fifth grade students. The data were collected from 887 students of randomly selected 14 elementary schools in the city of Eskişehir. As a result of factor analysis, the scale grouped in with three factors accounted for 42,08% of total variance with 28 items.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAŞAR, Ş., ANAGÜN, Ş. S. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersi bilimsel tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 43–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/215564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akdur, T. E. (2002). Temel eğitimde bilimsel okuryazarlığın bazı bileşenlerinin gelişimi. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  2. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001).
  3. Deneysel desenler, Ankara:
  4. PegemA Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 32, 470–483.
  5. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. Portsmouth: NH: Heineman. Carin, M. (1997). Teaching modern science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall. Chin, C. (2005). First year pre-service teachers in Taiwan: Do they enter the teacher programme with satisfactory scientific literacy and attitudes toward science? International Journal of Science Education, 27 (13), 1549-1570.
  6. Çilenti, K. (1988). Fen bilgisi öğretimi. Özel öğretim yöntemleri. Ed. Bekir Özer, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1-94.
  7. De Boer, G. E. (2000) Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601.
  8. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal component analysis: Quantitative applications in the social science series, (Vol 69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science related attitudes. Science Education. 62(4), 509-515.
  9. Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA: Test of science related attitudes handbook. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research. Howe, A. C. (2002). Engaging children in science (Third edition). USA: Merrill Prentice Hall. Kalaycı, Ş. (2005). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara:
  10. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara:
  11. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge. Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science in B. S. Bloom, J. T. Harting and G. F. Modous (Eds.). Handbook of summative and formative evaluation of students learning. NY: Mac Graw Hill. Koballa, T., Kemp, A. & Evans, R. (1997) The spectrum of scientific literacy. The Science Teacher, 64 (8), 27-31.
  12. Kress, G. (2003) Genres and the multimodal production of “scientificness”. In C. Jewitt ve G. Gres (Ed.), Multimodel Literacy (pp.172-186). New York: Peter Lang Publication. Martin, D. J. (1997). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empric